Question about Bounty managers - page 2.

asyakashi

sr. member

Activity: 1918

Merit: 256

Just.bet - Decentralized On-chain Casino

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .

I found many managers to be dishonest and rigged the campaign, this is the reason that No. 1 is not a good choice. Except using Escrow is more reliable

Averim

member

Activity: 515

Merit: 12

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

A well integrated bounty platform is more performant than the options mentioned above.

asbak66

copper member

Activity: 560

Merit: 0

Not both. If we have bad manager, he/she can run with the token from option one
If we choose option two, it all depends with the team. They can not pay us too.
So I don't know, but usually I join with the second option. It's more familiar.

oseikuf44

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 10

I Prefer Both Bounty managers and the team holding a bounty funds in an escrow account. So at the end of the campaign, both can initiate the transfer to hunters. The bounty manager alone holding the coin is not safe since the hunter is a also a bounty hunter working for incentives, he can bolt away with the funds if so huge ; the only punishment will be to get red trust on Bitcointalk forum.

shakesbear

member

Activity: 684

Merit: 10

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Really difficult question, in my memory there were bad cases in both option, if the Manager is trusted by the community, then the first option, if it is a beginner, then the second option.

ven7net

full member

Activity: 1946

Merit: 112

I think the first option is better than the second. If you find a normal manager who can be trusted, then if he has tokens for payments, it will be much better than if the manager sends the table to admins and we will wait for the tokens from them. Still, finding a good manager is easier than constantly worrying about whether the admins are reliable in a particular project.

Jrfranco

member

Activity: 786

Merit: 10

Given the choices, i would focus on the list number 1, because a trusted bounty manager could easily distribute the token after the campaign, unlike list number 2 it could take months that the team could be able to.distribute the coins to the participants, and yes its a good idea that the tokens be hold by the bounty manager.

Mr.ZODIAC

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 11

I think my answer will be like a double-edged stick when each end can strike. On the one hand, you can rely on the project team, But despite the fact that the team may have an official legal entity, it can still be deceived by explaining for various reasons, as it has already been repeatedly noted. And now if you put all the responsibility and funding on the Bounty Manager, then you need to know the person specifically and have an influence on him so that there is no temptation to deceive members of the Bounty company. Today, both those and others successfully abuse their capabilities.

cryp24x

sr. member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 253

If I would choose among the two options, then I prefer to choose the first option provided that the Bounty Manager have a good track record and the integrity is really high on doing his/her job. The reason would be speed because we don't need to wait for the team to assign one of their team to distribute. They are so busy to do that. One thing is that the Bounty Manager knows who really works hard and support the project.

mendra_2009

full member

Activity: 429

Merit: 100

It should be if I will choose the first choice, because if the Bounty Manager holds the coin it will make me relieved and not think negatively. If the gift manager must send the spreadsheet back to the team after the prize ends for distribution, I think it's about technicality. Sometimes it makes participants bored with rules that might be changed.

aundroid

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1247

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Basically I would prefer 1), like the majority here does.

In case I still have one wish left, I would like to have the payment in BTC or ETH. Thank you. Wink

zhekinsp

full member

Activity: 882

Merit: 126

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Its better to hold the token by manager itself or under some escrows but that doesn't make much difference.

Tokens are worthless until it hit exchange,so it is all in the hands of team.

elpiji

full member

Activity: 532

Merit: 101

now there are so many new bounty managers if you choose option 1 then I think it's too risky, you could just run away with a bounty manager carrying bounty hunter token

daniel2023

jr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 2

It depends on the credibility of the manager or the team. There are some reliable bounty manager, i will like to hold the tokens. There are also some faithful teams too. Your prayer as a hunter is for you not to meet a fraudulent manager or team.

pageraji

full member

Activity: 966

Merit: 100

I think the first choice is really save for bounty hunter if bounty manager is trusted like yahoo, sapta, arteezy and many good manager here, and i really like if we all paid not token but BTC or ETH is good one

juanda

full member

Activity: 756

Merit: 111

cro.baby

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

in my opinion tokens / coins are held or managed by the project team to be distributed to all bounty participants ... because I often experience fraud if the distribution is carried out by the bounties manager and team ... there is a reduction in the amount of coins previously set ... we should get 1000 coins, but in the end we only get 700 - 800 coins.. so I agree more like the answer number 2 that you mentioned above.

Mypanara19

member

Activity: 826

Merit: 11

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I choose the first option. That's why we have bounty managers so that they will manage and fix everything that are related to bounty campaign they handle. But either of the two options there are instances when the bounty hunters are being fooled by the bm and they sometimes take advantage of their position for their own personal gains alone. I just hope that all the bm's are just and fair with their people because as a bounty hunter it's undeniable that we truly contribute to the success of the project by means of spreading updates with every campaign we joined in.

suryapro

member

Activity: 854

Merit: 10

Yes, I also think the same about the above statement, namely I prefer number 1, because the name of the bounty manager's must be fully in control of the existence of the project. from the beginning of the campaign held to the token distribution. however, the project owner must monitor the manager's bounty during the token distribution. but remember, the project owner must provide ethereum to the manager's bounty as gas.

LimLims

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 272

1xbit.com

Quote from: jessyj48 on June 21, 2019, 03:08:44 AM

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

The first point is applicable, if the manager is trustworthy.
Else i would suggest to hire an escrow.
They will distribute the funds to the particiapnts.
These are the answers of your question.
Hope this helps you.

Iyanu14

member

Activity: 795

Merit: 10

I prefer escrowing it to reputable btt admins, team toils with bounty hunters and not pay on time most time, bounty manager can disappear with bounty token so giving it to an escrow is the best.

Topic: Question about Bounty managers - page 2. (Read 698 times)