Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 152. (Read 636458 times)

OT. Sorry. Too late. You can´t unsee this chair

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MW44jsYi0g

I have an idea.



There is no doubt that bikinis are a proxy of temperature.  This is settled science.  And you can't argue with the  Consensus.

If the All Knowing Always Right Gubbermint placed a high tax on bikinis, bikini sales would go down.

Therefore, global warming can be stopped by taxing bikinis.

http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/01/27/the-real-age-of-stupid-talking-heads-blame-latest-snowstorm-on-global-warming/

Bridgeport, CT Mayor Bill Finch (D) thanked MSNBC anchor Al Sharpton for “fighting the good fight on climate change” during a report on Winter Storm Juno on Monday’s “PoliticsNation.”

After urging residents to stay off the roads and reporting that emergency workers were ensuring that the elderly and homeless population were taking care of, Finch told Sharpton “thank you for your show, Reverend, you’ve been fighting the good fight on climate change, and we can see the crazy climate here, and we’d like to have a little bit more of you down in Washington.”


http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/26/mayor-thanks-sharpton-for-climate-change-work-during-blizzard-report/

Meanwhile, Hong Kong brilliantly adresses the "everything-but-CO2" pollution:



http://dailygeekshow.com/2015/01/27/chine-pollutions-photos/

This is not an accurate representation of Inhofe's opinions.  It has long been a Democrat strategy to demonize Inhofe, and this is just more of the same.

Inhofe called the corn-to-ethanol scheme for what it was:  A huge boondoggle.

Inhofe was a skeptic of the hustlers of "global warming" at least ten years ago, and now there has been no warming for 18 years.

Here are the kinds of things that make the propaganda merchants hate Inhofe:

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) told a Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) committee hearing today that the president must have fabricated two oft-repeated climate claims.

"Both statements are false," Sen. Inhofe said of Obama's global warming claims, since neither the EPA nor the U.N. IPCC climate group can provide any supporting statistics:

"On multiple occasions, and most recently on May 30th of last year, President Obama has said, and this is a quote he has used several times, he said that 'the temperature around the globe is increasing faster than was predicted even ten years ago' and that 'the climate is warming faster than anybody anticipated five or ten years ago.'

"Both statements are false, and through letters to you, Ms. McCarthy, and on the record in this Committee, we've asked the EPA to provide us with the data backing up these two statements, the two statements made by the president, but they don't have any data and referred us to the UN IPCC. And, their scientists, apparently, the EPA thought they were the source of this.

"Well, we went there and they had nothing to back it up, so apparently the president just made that up.

"And, I think that's very important because, when you get statements that are made, they're supposed to be logic and on truth, you have to check them out.

http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/craig-bannister/sen-inhofe-obamas-global-warming-claims-president-just-made

Why Climate-Science Denialism Should Disqualify Anyone From Holding Office







Last night, an event rapidly transpired in Washington that, while routine, was also so utterly lunatic it bears reconsideration. During a series of votes on the Keystone Pipeline, Senate Democrats proposed an amendment affirming that “human activity significantly contributes to climate change.” The amendment failed because only five Republican Senators supported it. Media coverage largely focused on the political machinations of both sides attempting to frame dueling votes in their preferred language. Yet the outcome of the vote reveals something profound and disturbing.

The Senate drama revolved around the Republican plan to hold a vote conceding that climate change itself is real, but — in keeping with the bizarre ramblings of climate-science skeptics — that it is all happening naturally. “Man cannot change climate,” James Inhofe declared. “The hoax is that there are some people that are so arrogant to think that they are so powerful that they can change climate.”

It is familiar, and yet worth reemphasizing, that Inhofe is not a random kook wearing a sandwich board who managed to slip past the Senate’s security guards, but a senator and the chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee. This is his stated belief: It is not even possible for human activity to contribute to climate change. It is arrogant to think so.

It is hard to imagine how such a bizarre conclusion could survive even a mind as primitive as Inhofe’s. To believe that human activity contributes to climate change, you need to believe two things. One, that certain gases trap higher levels of heat than other gases. Second, that burning fuel containing those heat-trapping gases releases them into the atmosphere. Which one of those beliefs is arrogant?[…]

The media’s instinct is to dismiss votes like those from last night as mere gestures in empty symbolism. Yet, while the vote did not change any policy outcomes, it ought to carry far more weight than a simple message vote. Or, rather, the message is of the highest importance. The Republican Party confidently and forthrightly rejects the firm conclusions of science on a major public-policy question. Isn’t that a completely disqualifying position? If a candidate for a managerial job at your office insists that two plus three equals seven, it wouldn’t matter how well-qualified this candidate may be at any other aspect of the job. Even if you agreed with everything else the Republicans stood for, how could a party so obviously unhinged be entrusted with power?


http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/01/denialism-should-disqualify-anyone-from-office.html

I can see their starting out strong.

gotta admit. they. got. balls.

1,700 PRIVATE JETS FLY TO DAVOS TO DISCUSS GLOBAL WARMING





A squadron of 1,700 private jets are rumbling into Davos, Switzerland, this week to discuss global warming and other issues as the annual World Economic Forum gets underway.

The influx of private jets is so great, the Swiss Armed Forces has been forced to open up a military air base for the first time ever to absorb all the super rich flying their private jets into the event, reports Newsweek.

“Decision-makers meeting in Davos must focus on ways to reduce climate risk while building more efficient, cleaner, and lower-carbon economies,” former Mexican president Felipe Calderon told USA Today.



http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/20/1700-private-jets-fly-to-davos-to-discuss-global-warming/

Pop star Pharrell Williams will join former US vice-president Al Gore at Davos to discuss climate change.

> http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jan/18/davos-agenda-al-gore-pharrell-williams-ebola-climate-change-oil



Obviously he knows what he is talking about right?

or maybe desperate times call for desperate measures.

IDGaF cuz I'm Happy!

#Globalwarmingischarlie

The Lich King is the master and lord of the Scourge, which he rules telepathically from the Frozen Throne atop the Icecrown Glacier.

Kil'jaeden created the Lich King from the spirit of the orcish shaman Ner'zhul to raise an undead army to conquer Azeroth for the Burning Legion. Initially trapped within the Frozen Throne with Frostmourne, the Lich King eventually betrayed Kil'jaeden and merged with the human Arthas Menethil. With the destruction of Frostmourne and the death of Arthas, Bolvar Fordragon took the powers of the Lich King within himself, imprisoning the master of the Scourge within the Frozen Throne once more.

The Lich King is the titular antagonist of World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King.

http://www.wowwiki.com/The_Lich_King

Look up and you can see the Lich King dragging his scourge cauldrons across the sky.

  Sadly true 

Circling back to the title of this thread...

I am not saying that a rationale debate between the scientists (previously "Deniers") and the New Deniers (previously "the Consensus") is not possible.  But it shows no signs of arising, and the New Deniers appear, increasingly, to citing articles of Faith from a Creed of Dogma.

In particular, recent assertions that "the land temperature record is more reliable" than the satellite record borders on crazy-talk.  The reasons for this should be obvious.

We're close to having our once esteemed Scientific Consensus slip into the realm of Bald Faced Liars.  If this continues.

Maybe it's time to ask the Warmers at Reddit whether they are ready to bail ship.

as an engineer everyone could understand that it's sure that if you locate a sensor in the same space between 1880 and 2015 it will get massive hotter readings... if you don't understand why... you have a problem.