Pages:
Author

Topic: Report a Signature Campaign Spammer! (Read 3024 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
July 11, 2021, 02:57:49 PM

Whoa tonto, calm down.

If you're gonna bump a 2-year old thread to report a sig spammer then you should at least get the campaign and manager right before immediately losing your shit.

Having said that, I'm not immediately opposed to the continuance of this thread.

jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 5
July 11, 2021, 05:54:12 AM
Bitcointalk username: wmaurik (Hero) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wmaurik-472651
From campaign: Fortunejack
Accusation: spamming random rubbishy oneliners in few minutes
Evidence: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wmaurik-472651;sa=showPosts (https://archive.is/RrvJi)
Wrong place to report this.

This thread was specifically created to curb spamming in the First Stake.com signature campaign, where there were so many complaints about spam due to the campaign requirements.

Fortunejack is managed by @Hhampuz, so it would be better is you sent him a PM to review a certain user that's enrolled in his campaign, or you could use his reputation thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hhampuz-reputation-thread-5129675
Did you read the topic at least?  Huh This topic is not about any specific campaign!!! Why the hell should we have to specify the campaign instead???

Bitcointalk username:
From campaign:
Accusation:
Evidence:

You are trying to fool me like a crook!
Do you know this account? Are you linked to him in some ways?
It doesn't work! And if you don't apologize and don't edit or delete your post it will show you're trying to deter people from reporting spammers!
Then you will deserve to be tagged as spammer accomplice.
 
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1272
Heisenberg
July 03, 2021, 11:54:41 AM
Bitcointalk username: wmaurik (Hero) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wmaurik-472651
From campaign: Fortunejack
Accusation: spamming random rubbishy oneliners in few minutes
Evidence: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wmaurik-472651;sa=showPosts (https://archive.is/RrvJi)
Wrong place to report this.

This thread was specifically created to curb spamming in the First Stake.com signature campaign, where there were so many complaints about spam due to the campaign requirements.

Fortunejack is managed by @Hhampuz, so it would be better is you sent him a PM to review a certain user that's enrolled in his campaign, or you could use his reputation thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hhampuz-reputation-thread-5129675
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 5
July 03, 2021, 10:09:55 AM
Bitcointalk username: wmaurik (Hero) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wmaurik-472651
From campaign: Fortunejack
Accusation: spamming random rubbishy oneliners in few minutes
Evidence: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wmaurik-472651;sa=showPosts (https://archive.is/RrvJi)
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
June 16, 2019, 11:54:14 AM
Is lyks15 part of stakes signature campaign or has been removed? Proof of spam:

He's not on the spreadsheet, so he has been removed.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
June 16, 2019, 11:48:01 AM
Is lyks15 part of stake's signature campaign or has been removed? Proof of spam:
That is a great project. Because all we know that all of us need protection because we are here in crypto world that a number one in scam and fraud issue and problem. All we know that we have on digital society so there is a big possibility that you will become of a victim of every illegal transaction like scam. It is good to have this kind of project to develop security features here in crypto industry.
This is posted in game-protect's thread. Game-protect has nice feedback from Stunna:
Primedice and Stake paying a bunch of mentally ill blatant liars and criminals highly indicates that Primedice and Stake itself is run by criminals!

Another example:
Looks good but I did not tried it yet. I hope I can enjoy all the features and freebies about this project on this site. But I hope this project will have a good and more security features that no one can immitate because all we know that this is the top concern of every crypto investor and gamers.
This is posted in Seuntjies DiceBot's thread. Seuntjies dicebot is....dice bot. There are no freebies. Why lyks hopes 6 year old project will have "good and more security features"? They are spammer, that's why.
If moderator have time to check recent spam from this account....
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
June 13, 2019, 12:41:02 AM
Regarding stake signature spam:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51449004
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
June 12, 2019, 11:10:40 PM
Also, I did ask to join your campaign, which you ignored...

...I don't see any evidence of you rejecting anyone who applied.

It's not my fault you had over -8000 trust when you tried to apply. You're spending far too much time being upset over getting rejected from the campaign and I knew you were wasting my time when you tried to claim over 40% of the campaign has 1-2 merits. Sorry but I'm not interested in responding to you anymore unless you have something constructive to say or at least semi truthful.


Perhaps you should have read the remainder of my post:
Quote
2 - You appear to believe having negative trust is a reason why someone is "incapable of being trusted or making a good post" as you do not accept negative trusted people into your signature campaign. Also, I did ask to join your campaign, which you ignored, however if I was participating in your campaign, I would have left because of a) the low pay rates, and b) because I do not want to be associated with the amount of spam your campaign generates

Also, nearly 40% of who applied on your signature campaign thread who were wearing a stake.com signature as of Sunday had received either 0 or 1 merit as of last Sunday. This does not count any merit anyone received as part of being "grandfathered" into the merit system when it was implemented. If you don't believe me, here is the data I collected:
Quote
Name   Profile link   Merit
pinoyden   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pinoyden-1047959   2
chaser15   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/chaser15-523501   6
blockman   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/blockman-816893   13
DaddyMonsi   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daddymonsi-516752   6
jakezyrus   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jakezyrus-1080167   0
traderethereum   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/traderethereum-837151   8
steveabrahams   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/steveabrahams-914450   2
Ahiaba   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ahiaba-936465   8
n0ne   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/n0ne-26401   8
ricardobs   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ricardobs-558313   4
Vaskiy   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vaskiy-452049   4
MiguelCryptoss   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/miguelcryptoss-2197886   3
redsun114   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/redsun114-558226   4
KennyR   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kennyr-110570   1
Kirito-kun   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kirito-kun-1671704   10
Pedro12528   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pedro12528-79408   2
Bitkoyns   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitkoyns-921760   6
mrdeposit   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mrdeposit-77867   3
lucashunter   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lucashunter-924846   0
YuginKadoya   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yuginkadoya-542292   21
Mcdacillo   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mcdacillo-1120590   0
Tamilson   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tamilson-772359   3
sapnu   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sapnu-968835   0
Bitinity   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitinity-449846   56
steampunkz   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/steampunkz-944644   18
eldrin   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/eldrin-1068482   38
ajqjjj   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ajqjjj-47593   7
babygun   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/babygun-1080288   4
free-bit.co.in   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/free-bitcoin-341170   19
MakeMoneyBtc   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/makemoneybtc-890476   15
EndimyonsDream   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/endimyonsdream-2001597   9
owengtam09   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/owengtam09-1030282   0
Carrelmae10   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/carrelmae10-1181642   0
wilburwilbur   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wilburwilbur-1190597   33
princ.imran   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/princimran-1541886   3
LUCKMCFLY   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/luckmcfly-1153977   40
Symphonized   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/symphonized-1928906   14
Danslip   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/danslip-338843   4
buleidada   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/buleidada-1169310   0
rdbase   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rdbase-374628   76
Alveus   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alveus-978304   17
titteringtacos   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/titteringtacos-552859   0
edisystem   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/edisystem-1041497   1
xvids   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xvids-948175   13
Danica22   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/danica22-1061461   0
EddieFx   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/eddiefx-2368538   10
bitbollo   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitbollo-364070   40
Beerwizzard   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/beerwizzard-1063803   26
Lexus19   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lexus19-1066825   6
wiik   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wiik-1205221   2
peonminer   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/peonminer-111072   18
burdeN   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/burden-523399   5
StartupAnalyst   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/startupanalyst-2254935   191
Haunebu   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/haunebu-218075   34
coin-investor   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/coin-investor-891131   3
smyslov   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/smyslov-924304   2
pinoycash   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pinoycash-369376   12
Blowon   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/blowon-871585   0
Reynaldo   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/reynaldo-211976   0
Chabacano   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/chabacano-467559   0
egetrorx   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/egetrorx-997692   8
Adriano2010   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/adriano2010-514126   12
okala   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/okala-1108241   5
Astvile   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/astvile-862738   14
basyang   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/basyang-986087   0
Carollzinha   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/carollzinha-377601   3
lyks15   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lyks15-1126017   0
Apriand   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/apriand-669062   7
cryptjh   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptjh-1188761   23
Coin-Desk   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/coin-desk-2507716   10
purple.thoughts   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/purplethoughts-1728451   2
alisafidel58   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alisafidel58-782621   26
r1a2y3m4   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/r1a2y3m4-1134322   19
ioanbtc   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ioanbtc-934389   1
rammy2k2   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rammy2k2-94485   2
bhabygrim   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bhabygrim-981553   0
Catmurs   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/catmurs-1817406   1
nauane   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nauane-380866   1
Zythiphill   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zythiphill-2222336   1
Probablylikely   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/probablylikely-980712   0
Kool5   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kool5-2105435   1
Malsetid   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/malsetid-663142   2
pushups44   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pushups44-972961   10
Ximoandali   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ximoandali-2173628   1
emulsifryer   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/emulsifryer-1004967   0
jakelyson   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jakelyson-555534   4
theinvestdude   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/theinvestdude-1073142   3
ChrisPop   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/chrispop-399267   4
jjeeppeerrxx   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jjeeppeerrxx-413783   38
niisarearning   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/niisarearning-988719   2
SirLancelot   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sirlancelot-525060   3
CryptoBry   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptobry-994859   39
casper77   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/casper77-73499   5
Script3d   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/script3d-697888   3
Pettuh4   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pettuh4-933347   1
Altcoins enthusiast   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/altcoins-enthusiast-1406625   16
Wakhid Mukti   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wakhid-mukti-820106   0
Micerker   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/micerker-1098829   0
Landak   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/landak-462517   3
fitty   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/fitty-25298   1
Yakamoto   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yakamoto-325035   7
Ray55   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ray55-1954799   3
waroenkshisha   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/waroenkshisha-952938   0
otandelapaz   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/otandelapaz-1110765   15
XinXan   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xinxan-440960   5
AuthorCRYPTO   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/authorcrypto-2248348   1
jak3   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jak3-555318   4
feryjhie   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/feryjhie-329895   69
usekevin   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/usekevin-130251   3
Genemind   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/genemind-774789   3
alcoholboy   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alcoholboy-2498684   4
bitcoinisbest   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoinisbest-893749   22
Obito   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/obito-976373   0
Akshat21   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/akshat21-1929411   1
pey   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pey-1003871   1
Mike Mayor   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mike-mayor-836754   10
uneng   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/uneng-493772   1
7788bitcoin   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/7788bitcoin-395871   0
gedor   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gedor-1009325   5
Bit_Happy   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bithappy-10197   19
leexhin   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/leexhin-976560   0
Nadziratel   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nadziratel-95619   9
Bardman   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bardman-459805   13
uray   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/uray-113074   0
davis196   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/davis196-710218   40
pakhitheboss   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pakhitheboss-1911471   10
ene1980   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ene1980-210650   1
KosmoKisa   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kosmokisa-522297   0
ChrisPop   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/chrispop-399267   4
furylmz   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/furylmz-983794   1
a7goo   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/a7goo-716260   1
nasipadang   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nasipadang-920708   0
Rune   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rune-106772   0
Ryan Dugan   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ryan-dugan-836847   1
lyfecoin   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lyfecoin-1305797   1
rodskee   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rodskee-1052219   1
aly   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/aly-150760   2
Vinalians   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vinalians-785629   0
Romanianz   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/romanianz-835056   0
Arizona   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/arizona-909152   0
quanyb98   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/quanyb98-1178717   3
lulumiya   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lulumiya-242323   4
meliodas   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/meliodas-915706   0
pieppiep   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pieppiep-49366   0
alexsandria   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alexsandria-918943   13
Achargeturry78   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/achargeturry78-773045   17
WatchMaker   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/watchmaker-1113972   0
Polar91   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/polar91-947291   115
Distraction   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/distraction-929299   0
BL46K 7193R   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bl46k-7193r-2585516   1
sr32703   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sr32703-1114889   4
fitty   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/fitty-25298   1
jake zyrus   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jake-zyrus-1053839   21
Handalger   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/handalger-2328874   1
julius caesar   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/julius-caesar-1092428   14
finzyoj   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/finzyoj-997123   5
daneal stev   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daneal-stev-2587867   2
Yatsan   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yatsan-857883   40
Magkirap   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/magkirap-962889   11
princesspoppy   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/princesspoppy-1141523   0
sunny28   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sunny28-982205   0
Handalger   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/handalger-2328874   1
flash101k   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/flash101k-847937   0
sammys   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sammys-788382   22
Belianez   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/belianez-2180836   1
Handalger   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/handalger-2328874   1
Blowon   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/blowon-871585   0
nelson4lov   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nelson4lov-919511   0
CoinChili   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/coinchili-1132066   0
Elysio   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/elysio-1098034   50
Pumuckel21   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pumuckel21-946129   0
Bunsomjelican   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bunsomjelican-992408   0
efialtis   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/efialtis-2597426   1
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
June 12, 2019, 08:30:57 PM
I'm just going to pay the last week and let people go on their way peacefully without spam disputes
Alright. As long as you're making a conscious effort to mitigate the amount of spam that erupts as a result of the campaign (by deterring the act of spamming), that's fine by me.

The issue at-hand is that the voluminous verbosity that is derived from the aggregate of Stake's campaign is probably too much for one person, right?

Why don't you cut down on the members or hire someone to help you count posts? And whoever does -- they should be very critical with the quality. In my opinion, 99% of posts that come from the campaign should be tossed.
member
Activity: 184
Merit: 60
June 12, 2019, 08:24:46 PM
Since you have this requirement: "Constructive posts only (no spamming)" any rule-breakers shouldn't be paid for their shitposts. Don't reward spamming. Roll Eyes

I'm just going to pay the last week and let people go on their way peacefully without spam disputes

Also, I did ask to join your campaign, which you ignored...

...I don't see any evidence of you rejecting anyone who applied.

It's not my fault you had over -8000 trust when you tried to apply. You're spending far too much time being upset over getting rejected from the campaign and I knew you were wasting my time when you tried to claim over 40% of the campaign has 1-2 merits. Sorry but I'm not interested in responding to you anymore unless you have something constructive to say or at least semi truthful.

copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
June 12, 2019, 08:05:50 PM
@hilariousandco

If you have anyone else you want kicked out let me know because I'm removing people right now since the week just ended
Realistically, you shouldn't even be restricted to only removing people after a week ends.

Since you have this requirement: "Constructive posts only (no spamming)" any rule-breakers shouldn't be paid for their shitposts. Don't reward spamming. Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 184
Merit: 60
June 12, 2019, 08:02:07 PM
@hilariousandco

If you have anyone else you want kicked out let me know because I'm removing people right now since the week just ended
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
June 12, 2019, 07:57:53 PM
Just shut up your mouth both stevestake and Symphonized just do your job!  All DT saying here is all true and have strong evidence against to your campaign! 🖕

Don't worry about the campaign anymore, idk who you're an alt of but odds are you're one of the people ruining things for everyone and you're probably about to get kicked out

I'm putting a Bitcoin bounty on this guy for anyone who can provide evidence of who he's an alt of so I can be 100% sure he gets kicked out
You are putting a bounty on finding out who your critics are?
newbie
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
June 12, 2019, 07:47:51 PM
Just shut up your mouth both stevestake and Symphonized just do your job!  All DT saying here is all true and have strong evidence against to your campaign! 🖕

Don't worry about the campaign anymore, idk who you're an alt of but odds are you're one of the people ruining things for everyone and you're probably about to get kicked out

I'm putting a Bitcoin bounty on this guy for anyone who can provide evidence of who he's an alt of so I can be 100% sure he gets kicked out
Oh really you do not need to do that I leave your campaign last few weeks ago because your rate is decreament. 
Just keep your bitcoin to your pocket or it will better if you adding your bitcoin bounty to stake campaign to increament payrate 🤟
member
Activity: 184
Merit: 60
June 12, 2019, 07:31:45 PM
Just shut up your mouth both stevestake and Symphonized just do your job!  All DT saying here is all true and have strong evidence against to your campaign! 🖕

Don't worry about the campaign anymore, idk who you're an alt of but odds are you're one of the people ruining things for everyone and you're probably about to get kicked out

I'm putting a Bitcoin bounty on this guy for anyone who can provide evidence of who he's an alt of so I can be 100% sure he gets kicked out
global moderator
Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
June 12, 2019, 01:15:51 PM

Ok thank you for the clarification so far. Anyway i would like to suggest some update if possible on the reports system.
Is it possible that the report provides a more concrete reason for the deletion rather than "considered off topic or any other reason" where the reason could be specified to provide more detail on why the deletion happened and not repeat it again?

Only theymos can implement something like that, but I agree it would be helpful and I and others have requested/suggested it before. A drop down menu with some of the common reasons posts are removed would be helpful, and/or a comment box so a mod can state the specific reason if it needs further clarification.
member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
June 12, 2019, 01:10:10 PM
I have to post twice a day if there informations to provide to users, don't make my statements your own words for your accusations
Also my deleted messages were essentialy replies and informations after some Users replied so no i wasn't even bumping the topic or updating on most of the deleted messages Smiley

I'm not twisting anything. What you said is plain for all to see. It doesn't matter if there is 'new information'. If it's within 24 hours then edit the previous post or the op. If we didn't have bumping rules certain businesses would just spam their thread 24/7 or multiple times a day to give them an advantage over others. The bumping rules are there to make it fair to all otherwise unscrupulous business would just dwarf the competition.

Well you are both wrong and you know why? Because my deleted posts HAPPENED when i was with Signature Campaign personal text message (telegram). Did you know that? Well you don't.. Now you do Roll Eyes
Nobody knew i was a Brand Manager till yesterday after changing my personal text message.
So let me ask again: what were the reasons for my deleted posts? Or the reasonable explanations as excuses to clarify such wrong deletions?

It looks like the person who reported them probably just worked it out. Doesn't take a rocket scientist looking at your post history. They were reported along the lines of the posts being an excessive bump due to you likely being a representative of stake, along with a few other off topic posts (so take that into consideration also).

Ok thank you for the clarification so far. Anyway i would like to suggest some update if possible on the reports system.
Is it possible that the report provides a more concrete reason for the deletion rather than "considered off topic or any other reason" where the reason could be specified to provide more detail on why the deletion happened and not repeat it again?
global moderator
Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
June 12, 2019, 01:06:05 PM
I have to post twice a day if there informations to provide to users, don't make my statements your own words for your accusations
Also my deleted messages were essentialy replies and informations after some Users replied so no i wasn't even bumping the topic or updating on most of the deleted messages Smiley

I'm not twisting anything. What you said is plain for all to see. It doesn't matter if there is 'new information'. If it's within 24 hours then edit the previous post or the op. If we didn't have bumping rules certain businesses would just spam their thread 24/7 or multiple times a day to give them an advantage over others. The bumping rules are there to make it fair to all otherwise unscrupulous business would just dwarf the competition.

Well you are both wrong and you know why? Because my deleted posts HAPPENED when i was with Signature Campaign personal text message (telegram). Did you know that? Well you don't.. Now you do Roll Eyes
Nobody knew i was a Brand Manager till yesterday after changing my personal text message.
So let me ask again: what were the reasons for my deleted posts? Or the reasonable explanations as excuses to clarify such wrong deletions?

It looks like the person who reported them probably just worked it out. Doesn't take a rocket scientist looking at your post history. They were reported along the lines of the posts being an excessive bump due to you likely being a representative of stake, along with a few other off topic posts (so take that into consideration also).
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
June 12, 2019, 12:40:43 PM
Nobody knew i was a Brand Manager till yesterday after changing my personal text message.

Doesn't matter. Rules 13, 21, and 32 don't allow the same user to post twice in a row in the same thread within 24h.

If multiple accounts are used for bumping, mods can probably interpret the rule to treat all those accounts as a single user, and "nobody knew" is not a valid excuse - if anything it makes it worse (covert shill bumping).
member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
June 12, 2019, 12:26:16 PM
You are missing that those are replies to users. And replies on the Topic when everyone is allowed to post since it's a free Forum.
Bumping / Updating per 24 hours are considered for OPs and not users. Since i am not the owner* and i can free speech my own opinion on the Topic those are considered normal replies.

Hey Symphonized, none of this would be an issue if you provided a source for the rule that you have stated.

Then nobody should reply more than once on a topic. Even if it is a non company user Smiley
Both you the global mod saying that if we are company users we should not make these sort of bumps, so that means if i am not a company user i am allowed after some other user posts something?

Check normal users replies then and you will be stunned of so many users Primedice and Stake provide such informations without being company users. Then following that all replies should be removed.

I have no idea what you're babbling about. User "Symphonized" posted twice in a row within 24h in the same thread. There are no other posts in between. User "Symphonized" should have edited their last post instead. It's as simple as that.

Well you are both wrong and you know why? Because my deleted posts HAPPENED when i was with Signature Campaign personal text message (telegram). Did you know that? Well you don't.. Now you do Roll Eyes
Nobody knew i was a Brand Manager till yesterday after changing my personal text message.
So let me ask again: what were the reasons for my deleted posts? Or the reasonable explanations as excuses to clarify such wrong deletions?

Why was this even deleted since nobody saw that i have posted as a company user for example? (And remaining 8 )


You should basically moderate everything and delete every post from Bitcointalk then if you consider those off rules.
Pages:
Jump to: