Topic: Report a Signature Campaign Spammer! - page 8. (Read 2956 times)

Feedback for the Stake signature campaign should be posted here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/stakecom-a-signature-campaign-for-everyone-closed-5110093

Let's not be spammers!

On the one hand it is positive that the manager of the campaign finally realizes that something is wrong with his signature campaign, but as suchmoon say it is your job to decide who gets into the campaign and what is quality post and what is spam.

Two major problems of this campaign is that you allow almost anyone to join, without check user post history and without taking the merits into consideration. Most of spammers have very poor history of posts, and just a few earned merit, this is not hard to notice. Second problem is to allow users to post anywhere in forum and to get pay for such posting ( now this is changed), and there is no way that you can evaluate such posts properly, especially in local boards.

Also quantity does not guarantee quality, this campaign has too many users who practically have the possibility to post hundred of post per week - and then we are back to problem of evaluating such huge number of posts.

Reducing the number of users, checking post history of every user, and setting a minimum amount of earned merits to participate in the campaign can solve all problems which this campaign currently has.

So you need the user here to report spammers ?

Good, I like to know if  you are not able to judge spam and low quality while counting the post?

BTW, the rate you are playing with so high limit of posting is designed to encourage spam only.

First, fix  your model ,you will automatically get the good participant.

maybe you should make a change by doing your job. or you could give it to someone who actually can.

There used to be a lot more before the token bounties took off, yours is just another repeat of the yobit campaign: indiscriminate acceptance with no quality control. the problem got to a point where yobit's campaign was blacklisted in the past, its a solid precedent to justify blacklisting stake's if it gets to that point.

before the introduction of the merit system, all you had to do was be here long enough and make a post once a day to eventually reach legendary. not that much wondering to do.

you're probably doing the most harm by not doing your job tbh. you contrinue to enable the spammers and put this thread out as some PR stunt to make it seem like you care.

Please resign!
I'm willing to do this job, and you can find my portfolio on the Services board, but I'm no charity.
If the owners would be interested in hiring a legit campaign manager, they'd have done it by now.

You could start by publishing a list of accepted campaign participants!

There are many spam-fighting initiatives on this forum, we don't need someone who caused spam to pretend to care.

This is for all campaigns not only 1! Let's stay on topic and keep this thread for improving Bitcointalk as a whole!

Name   Profile link   Merit   Rank   Posts Deleted
Catmurs   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/catmurs-1817406   1   Junior Member   127
Akshat21   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/akshat21-1929411   1   Junior Member   110
Yatsan   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yatsan-857883   40   Hero   94
lyks15   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lyks15-1126017   0   Full Member   93
okala   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/okala-1108241   5   Full Member   64
furylmz   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/furylmz-983794   1   Senior   58
Carrelmae10   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/carrelmae10-1181642   0   Member   56
Adriano2010   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/adriano2010-514126   12   Hero   56
steampunkz   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/steampunkz-944644   18   Senior   54
LUCKMCFLY   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/luckmcfly-1153977   40   Full Member   51
mrdeposit   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mrdeposit-77867   3   Hero   45
blockman   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/blockman-816893   13   Hero   42
xvids   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xvids-948175   13   Senior   42
cryptjh   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptjh-1188761   23   Full Member   35
alisafidel58   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alisafidel58-782621   26   Full Member   32
Haunebu   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/haunebu-218075   34   Hero   30
Bitinity   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitinity-449846   56   Lendendary   29
CryptoBry   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptobry-994859   39   Senior   29
Ximoandali   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ximoandali-2173628   1   Junior Member   28

all apparently in your campaign...

Dude... stop paying spammers, problem solved.

IT'S YOUR FUCKING JOB TO DEAL WITH THIS. You're abusing the forum by flooding it with spam and now you want the "community" to do the work for you for free. GTFO.

Have you seen someone in a signature campaign making posts with little to no value on threads? Publicly report them here!


Together as a community we can make a change! It's time to take Bitcointalk back!

Any form of a paid signature campaign on any forum is fundamentally encouraging people to post for no reason other than to profit. Since Bitcointalk is well known for it's wide selection of signature campaigns to join, it's to no surprise there's such a large amount of posts with little to no constructive value. It's time we crack down on all signature campaign abusers and report them here to be reviewed by the campaign managers. Maybe Bitcointalk won't ever fully be restored to what it once was but it doesn't mean we have to let things continue to spiral downwards at the rate they currently are.

Signature campaigns are like fuel for the forum

Ever since cryptocurrencies became mainstream more and more crypto businesses have been launching. With more crypto businesses comes more signature campaigns and naturally with more signature campaigns comes more potential low quality posts. However, we can't deny signature campaigns are beneficial to the forum if utilised correctly because they give people incentive to stay here and make posts. If we want to pull Bitcointalk out of this rut the first step is to use this thread to report all people who wear a paid signature and make low quality posts. It's impossible to have a signature campaign without at least some forced posts for money to meet the week's required minimum. There's too many people here only for signature campaigns but without the campaigns the forum would take a big hit. The staff & mods are working hard but it doesn't mean we shouldn't be doing our part to help out too.

The problems I've found as the Stake.com signature campaign manager

I've been managing the Stake.com signature campaign and I admit I've accepted some low quality posters because I assumed anyone who was capable of achieving a rank such as Senior member or higher without being banned was credible enough to be given a chance. This has proven to not be the case. A big problem I see is after I remove someone from the campaign they simply move on to another signature campaign. Sure it eliminates the problem for me in the short term but the problem continues into Bitcointalk in the long term. When we have so many low quality posters with high credentials such as being Legendary it makes me wonder how they even got to this rank in the first place.

Bitcointalk is suffocating. Let's bring it back to life!

Anyone who can say "this is our forum" needs to unite and put an end to this problem now! Report anyone here that's posting for a signature campaign and doing more harm than good. Through a community effort we'll clean out the forum and create an environment where Bitcointalk can grow the right way!


Example report post:

Bitcointalk username:
From campaign:
Accusation:
Evidence:

If we want to see the best results use evidence that is indisputable and not subjective
Please no reporting anyone for personal reasons! Let's keep this honest and effective, remember the goal!