Your participants have a median of 3 merit, nearly 40% have zero or 1 merit, and nearly 2/3 have 5 or less merit. There are 51 accounts that posted in your signature campaign thread that are perma banned, and although they all might not have been participating in your campaign when they were banned, I suspect the majority of them probably were.
Are you making this stuff up to try and bait me to count the merits?
If over 80% of the campaign is full member+ how can 40% have 1 merit? I'll give you something more accurate than the median merits of the campaign, the
average including Jr/Members
367.94 average merits for a Stake campaign member. It doesn't take much effort to find out your claim is 100% false
I look at your list of 51 banned accounts and I don't even know who majority of them even are. This is completely flawed because you're making your own list of people so your information is false. Low merits does not mean someone is incapable of a good post either. Are you incapable of being trusted or making a good post because your trust level is so negative?
Another thing, I'm fully aware what some of you are doing when you put a Stake signature on and then start trolling without being part of the campaign.
Example:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51190436There was never a point Souldream was ever in this campaign yet he was wearing the signature getting banned for plagiarism. He's still wearing the Stake avatar right now? This is obviously people attacking the campaign. How are you not trolling by trying to claim 40% of members have 1 merit, it's impossible. The fact you have so many merits for making that claim shows either merit abuse is very present on Bitcointalk (which it is) or people have no idea what they're talking about. It's handing out merits to support a post which is not true to gang up on me
However the root cause is that you are paying garbage rates
Higher pay rates will only encourage people to post more and lower pay rates encourage people to post less. If we truly want to see spam gone then remove all pay per post features because that will always encourage spam. Once I lowered the pay rates I saw an instant decrease in spam and it worked out well. I suggest other campaign managers stop over paying for posts because your supply of posters far surpasses your demand for them. But sure everyone is going to hate me for saying that even though it's true because so many are making a career out of Bitcointalk
Except for telegram names, all of this information is already in your thread because you asked people to post it in your thread.
This isn't true either...
Where am I asking people to post Telegram names other than in my private messages? If you went through the entire thread to find this "banned users" list how can you say something that makes it look like you didn't even read the first page lol