http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-02/claims-dont-add-unmasking-bitcoins-satoshi-nakamoto-just-publicity-stunt
Quote
However, as the Verge adds, "what’s missing is the math. Wright’s demonstration showed both reporters and Andresen a signature produced by a unique private key believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto. But that signature seems to have be pulled from a public message signed by Nakamoto in 2009, as researcher Patrick McKenzie showed on Github. The message failed to verify when McKenzie attempted to test it, a result of changes made to the OpenSSL protocol in the last seven years."
De toutes les manières, le vrai satoshi aurait bougé des fonds des premiers blocks s'il avait voulu se découvrir.
Les exchanges auraient aussi communiquées dans ce sens en voyant cela.
