Good point, if the fork happens just before the deadline then how about we wait up to 4 months for the minority chain to mine 2100 new blocks. If the minority chain doesn't mine 2100 blocks by then, we'll call it dead and I win the bet.
Regarding your term that if a fork happens, but BU reorgs so that the most-work chain no longer contains a block > 1 MB, I might be OK with that, but it's a bit unfair to me because what if we just get a random 1.1 MB block like we saw with bitcoin.com? I could see that happening again, and I don't think that should count as a fork. How about we define a "fork attempt" as occurring once the large block chain has at least 72 blocks built on top of it?
I am happy with Dooglus as escrow.
it when/if he posts an address. Want to do more than 1 BTC by any chance?Regarding your term that if a fork happens, but BU reorgs so that the most-work chain no longer contains a block > 1 MB, I might be OK with that, but it's a bit unfair to me because what if we just get a random 1.1 MB block like we saw with bitcoin.com? I could see that happening again, and I don't think that should count as a fork. How about we define a "fork attempt" as occurring once the large block chain has at least 72 blocks built on top of it?
I am happy with Dooglus as escrow.
Excellent, sounds great to me. I'm ok with 72 blocks being considered a "fork attempt". I've PM'd a link to this conversation to Dooglus and will fund
Considering Peter just tried to get you to accept a bet with dubious terms, what on earth makes you think you can trust his choice of escrow?
Be very very careful with these people and anything that resembles promises or trust, they're so duplicitous that they will sully their own reputations even further for the sake of, how much Peter? 1 BTC?
It wasn't Peter's choice of escrow. RHavar proposed to use dooglus as escrow and Peter said he was happy with it. Can't you read the thread?
