Regarding your term that if a fork happens, but BU reorgs so that the most-work chain no longer contains a block > 1 MB, I might be OK with that, but it's a bit unfair to me because what if we just get a random 1.1 MB block like we saw with bitcoin.com? I could see that happening again, and I don't think that should count as a fork. How about we define a "fork attempt" as occurring once the large block chain has at least 72 blocks built on top of it?
I am happy with Dooglus as escrow.
Excellent, sounds great to me. I'm ok with 72 blocks being considered a "fork attempt". I've PM'd a link to this conversation to Dooglus and will fund it when/if he posts an address. Want to do more than 1 BTC by any chance?
Considering Peter just tried to get you to accept a bet with dubious terms, what on earth makes you think you can trust his choice of escrow?
Be very very careful with these people and anything that resembles promises or trust, they're so duplicitous that they will sully their own reputations even further for the sake of, how much Peter? 1 BTC?
why would you not trust dooglus as an escrow?