Pages:
Author

Topic: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC. - page 30. (Read 64851 times)

hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
This sounds like a great deal for both of us.  I look forward to ironing out the exact details and terms.  I'm super busy for the next 48 hours,  but would love to connect after that.

Can we join? I think most of our investors would agree on this deal which makes it almost 3600BTC.

Regards,
Alex.
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
If Ver can really throw away that much dough pointlessly, why doesn't he hire a professional programmer or two to audit the damn code? It doesn't add up.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 500
That means 60,000 BTC, but that's not 60 million USD? What happens if the BTU is approved and created? Does the value of bitcoin change and decline dramatically? And how will the BTU be worth? These are the questions that I want to know. Please give me answer. And if that happens, where can I use BTC to get a BTU? In other words, where can I double my coin ?
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
I'd be interested in participating in a pool if it can be organized. I'm guessing there's thousands of BTC that would be interested in this. I'd trust dooglus as an escrow if no atomic swap can be established.

Definitely. Sign me up as well, but let's try to use coinjoin or something of the sort.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
What a thread OMG, all the heavy weight bitcoin champions are here. This is the clash of the kings.



Let the fork happen as soon as possible please, i want to see who'll win and who'll lose immediately Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
I'd be interested in participating in a pool if it can be organized. I'm guessing there's thousands of BTC that would be interested in this. I'd trust dooglus as an escrow if no atomic swap can be established.
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Taking all these BTC from Ver is a huge service to the community. As well as fantastic business, if he doesn't backtrack like a scared crab.

Thanks, Loaded.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074
It wasn't Peter's choice of escrow. RHavar proposed to use dooglus as escrow and Peter said he was happy with it. Can't you read the thread?

You're right, I was skimming.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1253
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60ozkh/rogerver_lets_make_a_deal_1_for_1_trade_at_least/

bitcoin-cli signmessage 19Mz2o9RDABT74SA9njZqMtJXKEzj2qUoH '@RogerVer lets make a deal, 1 for 1 trade. At least 60k, possibly up to 130k, my BTU for your BTC.'
H9ed6z5RgdThRxXXqePmtJbaK1pGvoy6e+aiwUPD6pkrJ6d6TBchOu5OQLEbgq/15YRjcOUC+kMrGVfszUXV5Wc=

This sounds like a great deal for both of us.  I look forward to ironing out the exact details and terms.  I'm super busy for the next 48 hours,  but would love to connect after that.

OK, I hereby confirm the deal. As soon as there is a BTU/BTC Split, MemoryDealers (Roger Ver) has to pay a minimum of 60k and a maximum of 130k post-split BTC to Loaded. Loaded has to pay the same amount of BTU to MemoryDealers.

You know as well as I do, that doesn't mean shit. He can just claim that his account was compromised.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! However a signed message would be welcome.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
You know as well as I do, that doesn't mean shit. He can just claim that his account was compromised.
Ah yes, one of the known 'tactics'. I guess an equivalent signed message is required to confirm his acceptance.

At the very least. He's a well known personality. I won't believe he's agreed until I see video of him accepting.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
You know as well as I do, that doesn't mean shit. He can just claim that his account was compromised.
Ah yes, one of the known 'tactics'. I guess an equivalent signed message is required to confirm his acceptance.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
I didn't expect Ver to accept this bet. I'll be watching this. Cheesy

This sounds like a great deal for both of us.  I look forward to ironing out the exact details and terms.  I'm super busy for the next 48 hours,  but would love to connect after that.
Quoted for reference.

You know as well as I do, that doesn't mean shit. He can just claim that his account was compromised.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I didn't expect Ver to accept this bet. I'll be watching this. Cheesy

This sounds like a great deal for both of us.  I look forward to ironing out the exact details and terms.  I'm super busy for the next 48 hours,  but would love to connect after that.
Quoted for reference.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1097

Edit:

Step 3: When the tx in step 2 is sufficiently confirmed (number of blocks to be determined), Loaded will send 60000 BTU tokens to the following P2SH address:

I think the idea is that they would want to lock the coins in place before any fork happens. Your plan seems like it requires the fork to have already happened.

This is not possible without a replay protection, which BU refuses to include
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1330
The biggest BTC value bet I can remember was on Just-Dice, where a player lost a little over 7000 BTC on a single dice roll.

The second biggest was this one in which Vandroiy won 5000 BTC from pirateat40.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
this may be one of the biggest if not THE BIGGEST bet in history.

http://www.aol.co.uk/money/2012/09/13/10-of-the-biggest-bets-ever-placed/

ok, aol is not a prime source, i will dig deeper. first few google attempts did not show a bigger one yet.

holy handgrenade. i will buy shares of a popcorn company, because they will rise!


edit:
http://www.32red.com/blog/5-biggest-bets-of-all-time/

editII: it is more a trade than a bet.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1330
BitcoinUnlimited can end costing more than Bitcoin Core, Bitcoin core will end costing 1/10 of BU price and will be renamed to Bitcoin classic just like Ethereum-

The "Bitcoin Classic" brand was already taken. It was the 2nd of 3 (so far) attempts to hard fork Bitcoin to a larger blocksize limit. XT, then Classic, and now Unlimited.

For BTU to exist, it needs to have more proof-of-work than BTC (as if BTC's work exceeds it, it will be considered valid and the BTU will reorg away).

I expect BU would add a checkpoint on the first >1MB block to prevent the BU chain every reorging back to the Bitcoin chain.

Loaded's term:

I'll add the contingency that the deal is null and void if there are major changes to either.

needs clarification. "Major changes" is too vague I think. BU adding a checkpoint to prevent reorgs back to the pre-fork chain could be called a major change, for example.

Alright: how about a small side bet for us little fish?  I bet you 1 BTC that--should the most-work blockchain include a single block larger than 1 MB--that no minority chain will make it beyond 2100 blocks (~2 weeks and the length of a difficulty adjustment) without either a difficulty reset or a change in the proof-of-work algorithm.  If I win, the 2 BTCs in escrow will be sent to me.  If you win, the 2 BTCs on both chains will be sent to you.  If nothing happens by December 31, 2017, we both get our 1 BTC back.

This could use a lot of clarification. The designation of "the most-work blockchain" is possibly going to refer to different chains at different times. It would be clearer to talk about chains by whether they contain at least one >1MB block or not. Also, it seems odd to specify the "~2 weeks" clause when any minority chain is almost guaranteed to take over 4 weeks to mine 2100 blocks.

[Edit: also I have seen posts from BU supporters saying that they will attempt to kill the Bitcoin blockchain in the event of a hard fork by deliberately orphaning any blocks on it, replacing them with empty blocks. If such a 51% attack happens it seems likely some kind of countermeasure would need to be taken, possibly a change of the work algorithm. Your bet then reads like "in the event of a hostile hard fork the original chain will die unless it takes steps to protect itself from attack" which is maybe self evident.]

While this is pretty amazing and popcorn worthy for the community, and you are uniquely positioned to make such a bet... Wouldn't it be more prudent to invest some of those risked coins to improve the bitcoin ecosystem? 40k coins buys a lot of developer time! It's enough to start and fund several bitcoin startups.

I guess from Loaded's point of view he isn't risking anything of value. He's only risking some valueless altcoin that has no chance of success. Once he wins the bet he will have doubled his Bitcoin count while simultaneously having reduced Roger's ability to further damage Bitcoin.

Anyway, I'm happy with 1 BTC and will go as high as 100 BTC.  May I suggest Dooglus as an escrow, but I'll take anyone of the standard escrows here.

I would be happy to act as escrow, but I would need the rules to be a lot clearer than I have seen so far.

Regarding your term that if a fork happens, but BU reorgs so that the most-work chain no longer contains a block > 1 MB, I might be OK with that, but it's a bit unfair to me because what if we just get a random 1.1 MB block like we saw with bitcoin.com?  I could see that happening again, and I don't think that should count as a fork.  How about we define a "fork attempt" as occurring once the large block chain has at least 72 blocks built on top of it?

It seems possible to me that there could be a deliberate fork attempt but that it loses support quickly enough that it never reaches 72 blocks long from the forking block. For example, perhaps a significant percentage of the hashrate currently signalling BU support is trolling you, and won't ever actually mine BU blocks but just wants you to try forking. How happens in that case?

Let me think about whether I'd like to bet more that 1 BTC and I'll get back to you.  

Do you have any problem with me posting the terms of our bet on Reddit (once dooglus has accepted and we've made sure that the terms are unambiguous), in order to generate some publicity?

I have no problem with using Reddit, or a separate BitcoinTalk thread. We should probably move off of this thread though and leave this one for the Loaded/Roger bet.

Edit:

Step 3: When the tx in step 2 is sufficiently confirmed (number of blocks to be determined), Loaded will send 60000 BTU tokens to the following P2SH address:

I think the idea is that they would want to lock the coins in place before any fork happens. Your plan seems like it requires the fork to have already happened.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1097
Reddit seems to have caught that post in a spam filter, it shows up when I'm logged in. I lost the password to my other reddit account.

60K is personal holdings, possibly up to an additional 70K in client funds depending on their sentiment, which pretty strongly leans Core.

Escrow wise, I would hope someone could come up with an atomic swap method.

No split, no transaction. If there is a split, I'd love to double up.

Step 1: Roger will generate a secret random value

Step 2: On the original chain, Roger will send 60000 tokens to the following P2SH address:
Code:
IF <100> CSV DROP ELSE HASH256 EQUALVERIFY ENDIF CHECKSIG

Step 3: When the tx in step 2 is sufficiently confirmed (number of blocks to be determined), Loaded will send 60000 BTU tokens to the following P2SH address:
Code:
IF <10> CSV DROP ELSE HASH256 EQUALVERIFY ENDIF CHECKSIG

Step 4: If Roger is satisfied with the transaction of step 3, he will collect 60000 BTU with the following signature (in not more than 10 blocks of time)
Code:
0

Step 5: Loaded will collect 60000 original BTC tokens with the following signature
Code:
0

---------

In case Loaded failed to do step 3, Roger will be able to get his BTC back after 100 BTC blocks

In case Roger failed to do step 4, Loaded will be able to get his BTU back after 10 BTU blocks

You'd better try this on testnet before using real money
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
This sounds like a great deal for both of us.  I look forward to ironing out the exact details and terms.  I'm super busy for the next 48 hours,  but would love to connect after that.


No way you will accept at the end, lols will be hard. BTU hacked again and the only way your paid 2nd tier devs can fix it is with closed source patches.
full member
Activity: 369
Merit: 111
Good point, if the fork happens just before the deadline then how about we wait up to 4 months for the minority chain to mine 2100 new blocks.  If the minority chain doesn't mine 2100 blocks by then, we'll call it dead and I win the bet.  

Regarding your term that if a fork happens, but BU reorgs so that the most-work chain no longer contains a block > 1 MB, I might be OK with that, but it's a bit unfair to me because what if we just get a random 1.1 MB block like we saw with bitcoin.com?  I could see that happening again, and I don't think that should count as a fork.  How about we define a "fork attempt" as occurring once the large block chain has at least 72 blocks built on top of it?

I am happy with Dooglus as escrow.
it when/if he posts an address. Want to do more than 1 BTC by any chance?
Excellent, sounds great to me. I'm ok with 72 blocks being considered a "fork attempt". I've PM'd a link to this conversation to Dooglus and will fund


Considering Peter just tried to get you to accept a bet with dubious terms, what on earth makes you think you can trust his choice of escrow?


Be very very careful with these people and anything that resembles promises or trust, they're so duplicitous that they will sully their own reputations even further for the sake of, how much Peter? 1 BTC?

It wasn't Peter's choice of escrow. RHavar proposed to use dooglus as escrow and Peter said he was happy with it. Can't you read the thread?
Pages:
Jump to: