Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 139. (Read 82167 times)

According to my research, KYC activities cause the casino some extra bucks which they ought to have used for other purposes but they have to accept the KYC/AML because they have no option.
 I think is time for people to ask themselves the below question, specifically those that think some casinos are not been fair when they implement KYC.
If KYC somehow limits the level of casino users why would they choose to use it?

I agree
it's a never ending debate but a really important one

maybe it'd deserve its own topic, in reality.

I don't think roobet or these big websites will change their policy anytime soon either
after you adopt KYC it's no turning back.

That is true, it's not something that casinos would want, why would they need your KYC for themselves? It is not something that would help them at all. However, we should also realize that after it has already happened, and after KYC was introduced, some of the casinos started to use it to prevent people from doing things against the rules, so nothing government related but purely for casinos sake.

So, it wasn't like purely for government after a while, it was also for the casinos that dealt with it as well. It's definitely a benefit for the whole casino world, either you ask it right away, or ask it when something happens, but they do ask for it.

Many think about staying here even if there's KYC required its because roobet already establish a good reputation here that's why majority trust them and the only people who's skeptical are those complete newbie. They also need to understand that evading this requirements stu no guarantee for them to get comprised since if they go on small casino the risk is so high for them to get scam.

With level 1 kyc I don't have too much problem but going up and submition of my personal documents is not fine with me and don't need it also being a small gambler over Roobet and like to play over here.Many others also have the the opinion that they want to play over legit casino with KYC also instead of going to some unknown casino that could steal their funds.So we can keep playing or find other options if we are not satisfied nothing else can be done.

Let's not forget that 98% of all crypto casinos have sided with the players but the abuse and manipulation of some gambling users which used casinos to tint stolen crypto are what make the SEC and other government agency to introduce the KYC/AML in the crypto casino setting. Besides, we need to understand the casino is not happy about spending some extra funds on KYC verification and user data protection.

Having said that, if the platform can be easily hacked as you said a lot of issues would have happened before now.

Yes, and that's where we have to assume that if things aren't done that way, then it doesn't make sense, that is, the casinos have to side with the players, in the future there will be many problems that have to do with privacy, the dangers will be imminent and no one likes to leave their data on platforms that can be easily hacked and that do not offer them any type of backup, if this is so, if people do not play more in casinos they would simply fail, so it will become something very complicated, because there will be casinos that go against all KYC, and of all lack of identification, let's not be surprised that casinos with 0 KYC will come out.


This is very true, in casinos we have the complete freedom to choose the one we want, but when choosing it we know that they all have their own rules or laws, and due to the requirements to maintain their authenticity and licenses, they require KYC is something that escapes so much. from the hands of the casino as well as from us, we all know the ances that governments have to put the s mnaos in the crypto world, and they know that casinos handle a lot of money, if they do not meet certain standards it is likely that the casino will be put in danger, a government or a command entity does not care about the life of a casino or a company, they only want their share of the money, and one way they find is through regulations, rules, KYC, it is a tactic.




I understand that many people question KYC, but you have to remember something, in every casino, new or old, there will always be a KYC requirement, this is something that will be normal and that will be for all casinos, for me I already know I see normal, also sometimes as players we want something and then we complain, that is, sometimes when casinos do not have certain licenses, we say that it is important, that licenses are needed to be able to trust completely, when there are licenses and they require KYC then we get upset, and yes, there are reasons, but if they don't demand that, they won't be in compliance with the law, and they could sanction the casino, or even close it, sometimes we must accept certain demands, and we are all free to play in casinos Our favorites, in the case of Robbet, it has always shown its great commitment to players, and it is reliable and has a great reputation, for me that is enough, of course, there are more demanding customers, but the trend is always It will go in that direction.

If you manage to participate in events recently then yeah you need to comply with their KYC as this was strictly implemented earlier last year but if you happen to join or play in the past? nope their KYC requirement is only for those under questioned and not mandatory , I have been playing and joining event for many times even before and yes there are no strict kyc back then.
but about the info of each account? I'm sure that this will remain safe and private as this will only runs from the team and the players involved.

Yes the level 1 kyc implementation is so sudden. But as you can see many gamblers still comply and chose to stay, not only those who have funds on their account but the gamblers who trusted Roobet as a reliable casino. As you have pointed out the Government have ways to regulate the casinos and it's inevitable for them to continue to operate. Thus it's up to us if we will comply or will stay away.

Is the team of Roobet remain anonymous? I’m not following this project for a long time though I manage to participate on their contest and I can say that once you deal with Roobet, you have no choice but to comply with their KYC requirement or else you can’t access your account. If KYC is a requirement, I also agree that the site should also disclose their information, this can also help to at least give peace of mind for the gamblers.

Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?

This is actually what happened to Roobet before, I remember they implement KYC without announcing it and the gamblers left with no choice but to comply or else they will not access their money, though it’s only a level 1 KYC but doing that without announcing is something not good. Well, it happened years ago and I don’t think it’s still an issue here. Regulations will always win, the government have its own way to regulate casinos, and KYC is one thing.

Many are requiring level 1 KYC first but sooner or later they will surely ask for another KYC which requires the supporting documents and that is because of the regulations which is already beyond the control of any gambling site. If you are still not ok with the KYC, better to use other platform for now but don’t stay your money on any site because they can implement KYC even without informing you.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

Roobet is one or the highest growing casino in the online casino space. It has a very good reputation in the forum. All the campaign I have seen or met as I came to the forum Roobet is one of the last longing I know. Although I have seen other two like Chipmixer and The Best Change.


But I have not heard any bad report on Roobet both in payout or in security. Roobet uses their KYC and also ues it to secure their transaction. Yes online server is the best option for the use of KYC. Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

I understand that it takes time, but you could literally just hire one or two people for that job and be done with it and roobet is a multi-million dollar company that keeps on giving away a lot of stuff to the gamblers as well. Meaning they can definitely afford to hire some people, hell hire a dozen people if they want to, sure that would be useless cost but they can afford it at least it looks like that.

This is why I am not entirely sure the reason would be the hard work it would put. I feel like it is just to make sure that they separate the KYC to another company, for "just in case" reasons, it is adding a layer of security and that’s better.

I understand your point but when I said third-party verification system that works with the government I was referring to the sector that verifies clients KYC information using the government databases and if you look closely all these third-party companies don't work directly with the government they are a private organization but work according to government rules.

No platform wants to have issues with governments nowadays when regulations in cryptocurrency industry have become stricter and stricter.

If they can obey regulations, locally and regionally as well as globally, they would like to do this as best as possible. It will be good for their reputation that is helpful to maintain current customer base and expand to potential ones.

It also is helpful to prevent unnecessary harmful fud against their platform.

In order to have full transparent and touch customer hearts, they should write all things clearly and transparently then publish it publicly for community including customers to explore if they have time and interest in reading for their own sake benefit.

Frankly Roobet.com is well with their Term of Services, no shady writings as far as I know.

That is not my point rather that kind of platform exists, of course, because there is a demand, but it is as an act of preventive measure in the business that Roobet deals with. They try to minimize having an issue with government or authority, so it is a prerequisite to follow what regulation suggests, and the way to achieve that is to integrate such kind of platform.

It is not merely that those platforms are in touch directly with governments, but it just simply a sector that a business needs based on what the regulation suggests.

I'm glad to see someone that understands that if the casino considers the expense of the company verifying the user's KYC, keeping the data offline, or hiring a governmental third-party company they won't like to implement KYC but they are doing it just to make friend with the Feds and to keep their business going.
@FanEagle Keeping information on some offline server also have con and pro. I don't consider it easy as you said and the casino cannot handle the in-depth criminal search but their user so using a third party that specialized in the field is the best option.



These are some of the reasons why I believe the third party that works with the government is the best option.