KYC is very important because it is the key to their authenticity, the subject is complicated, but both sides must be understood.
That's tough. Majority of the gamblers including me will continue hating on KYC due to various reasons which is why it's very, very difficult for both sides of the KYC debate to reach a mutual consensus.
I'd say bear market will make them get benefit since gamblers will try to gamble more in order to get profit from bear market and the fees is much lower due to the network aren't busy.
That makes zero sense. Gamblers will try to gamble less due to the bear market which will directly cause these gambling sites to earn less in the short-term.
yes, like many cat and mouse games this will be a never ending debate with the probable outcome of KYC policies getting more and more restrict over time, and possible some decentralized alternatives appearing here and there
Whether we do like it or not, there's no other path we would really be seeing or taking but to have those KYC sooner or on later years, considering that regulation and laws becomes even more tighter as the years passing.Good thing we do have here is that we do still have options which other platforms would really be taking the place into those who had fallen into that KYC set-up.
We've seen that there are still lots of platforms or companies that doesnt apply that KYC this is why we do still have choice or option to take.
I do agree that this is really indeed a never ending debate or talks about KYC.
Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?
Well sometimes an owner can be many owners, this may be a reason why the owner is anonymous, although that is not an excuse, however when one sees a casino with a high reputation and with very good confidence one can think that the casino has security that influences everything related to its clients and most active players, it's like I say, if there is a casino that is just coming out, for me it would be a much higher risk to leave a KYC, really in all the systems that exist in the world there is always information and details that give our whereabouts, for all of us we have seen that a casino with a great reputation, in this case like Robobet, I do not care if it has an anonymous owner or not, I only care that the casino be safe, trustworthy and that my money will not be taken by scammers.
No doubt Roobet has acquired a good reputation in the market. I have reviewed many users' reviews and barely found any negative thoughts against a single user. Also, the wide range of games collection and the fast withdrawal and deposit process has made it an unbeatable casino compared to the other casinos. So keep it up, guys.
It is very good that you have chosen that path, in all casino sites or on any platform, there will always be someone who wants to speak ill of a casino just out of envy, sometimes it is resentment because they play in a casino and lose, so they are bad losers and they believe that the casino took their money or stole it, that is something that always happens, but the important thing is that here in the forum there will always be many people who are from the trusted system DT of the forum who will give the approval to Roobet, and this will make them trust more in the casino, besides the fact that the casino is very good, they always do art contests to give the opportunity to win big.