Author

Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 143. (Read 82087 times)

legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1243
Cashback 15%
Who would be the one on their right minds on selling out their information from other people? We do value our privacy and information that much, unless if those informations been sold out are totally fake and not

theirs which it would really be that normal that they would really be that confident on doing so but if its yours then its impossible that you would confidently selling out those information for mere amounts.

We do know on whats the result of leaked information or being compromised which it could really be used on other means or ways which it might really be putting you up in trouble.

There are lots of members in this forum who performed KYC just to have a sit on airdrops.  So probably those people are not on their normal minds.  Though I think those who doesn't think too much of privacy as a very important matter will give their information.  You can find plenty of them on social media, even publishing their normal everyday lives together with their selfies and family, friends and relatives' photos. 


This is also the reason why many got scammed especially with their other accounts, giving someone your personal information is not good at all even if you get paid for that, in gambling that might work but I still not suggest this. Though requiring some documents might be the last option for the site to verify your account there’s also a chance that the information you get can also be used by other gamblers since that person is selling his identity and that could compromise your account as well.

As long as the Casino is licensed and follows regulations, it cannot ignore the demand of the authority.  they have to give-in in order to have a smooth operation.  Putting myself in the owner's shoes, I would rather lose some players than lose my business completely.  And besides licensed Casino are bound by the rule of user's privacy and they will have problems if they leak or sell their users' informations.  It can also cause their licensed as casino operator so I believe reputable casinos will safeguard their users information.
sr. member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 324
To hide their identity. This is one of the major reasons why people ask others to verify an account using their name.

I know.
However, the point is, those people that engaged with this kind of transaction (account verification through other person's identity) will just try to verify the account. If the account needs more documents, the one who ask/paid him to verify will just ask the "victim" to send/pass another document, in which he might be willing to do it for some money.
This is also the reason why many got scammed especially with their other accounts, giving someone your personal information is not good at all even if you get paid for that, in gambling that might work but I still not suggest this. Though requiring some documents might be the last option for the site to verify your account there’s also a chance that the information you get can also be used by other gamblers since that person is selling his identity and that could compromise your account as well.
Who would be the one on their right minds on selling out their information from other people? We do value our privacy and information that much, unless if those informations been sold out are totally fake and not

theirs which it would really be that normal that they would really be that confident on doing so but if its yours then its impossible that you would confidently selling out those information for mere amounts.

We do know on whats the result of leaked information or being compromised which it could really be used on other means or ways which it might really be putting you up in trouble.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1848
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
<...>

People need to know that government regulating the casino or any other platform is not bad because they just make sure that they are following the legal procedures before they can operate their businesses in their country and it add another extra protection to costumers because we can assure if the casino or platform is well regulated then we can say they are legit ones. Although some part of it maybe government will create laws that required us to pay tax on our crypto income but I think its still fine as long as we can use crypto and can able to continue to use the platforms we want.

from this comment I suppose you live in a country with lower level of corruption than I do and probably more efficiency in government decisions
this is not how the music plays in most of the countries, unfortunately.

I also agree with you, people who think this way about their government are usually from countries like Switzerland, Finland, where the degree of happiness is very high and everyone has a good life with respect to what they do, in the case of South America no country is like that, quite the opposite, for example in Venezuela if the government can take advantage of something or your work or whatever it is that represents wealth, they want to have their good slice, otherwise they would not give growth options If nothing else takes advantage of the companies, and many times when they do not comply, they take over the companies, that is something that is a reality.
hero member
Activity: 1946
Merit: 575


Isn't the purpose of KYC to make it harder to money launder? Well in that case if you are using someone else, and paing them to do it, then its going to be harder to handle anyway, so its working out. I am not saying its impossible to fake it, its not impossible to fake your KYC, or find someone else, or edit it, whatever you can think of, its posible. However, is it harder? Is it as easy as gambling in a casino with no KYC? Of course not, it makes it harder to do it, and thats why its there. Law doesn't stop you from comitting a crime, it punishes you AFTER you do it, thats why you also carry the risk of getting caught at all times, and losing all of that money too.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 728
I know.
However, the point is, those people that engaged with this kind of transaction (account verification through other person's identity) will just try to verify the account. If the account needs more documents, the one who ask/paid him to verify will just ask the "victim" to send/pass another document, in which he might be willing to do it for some money.
It sounds possible, make a fake KYC sounds possible too especially you have a good editing skills.

But do you think you can always contact the victim? what if the victim delete his social media accounts etc and you can't reach him again? you don't have any way except find him even it's costly and wasting time. The victim can be smarter since he have the whole power to give or not his KYC, he might ask very huge amount money since he know you're very need him. This will make you lose a lot money or lose your account.
sr. member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 260
Binance #SWGT and CERTIK Audited
To hide their identity. This is one of the major reasons why people ask others to verify an account using their name.

I know.
However, the point is, those people that engaged with this kind of transaction (account verification through other person's identity) will just try to verify the account. If the account needs more documents, the one who ask/paid him to verify will just ask the "victim" to send/pass another document, in which he might be willing to do it for some money.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 650
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.
The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.
What would you expect? Government would be always like that, they do really love on touching up everything and would be avoiding that they are letting themselves getting behind on what ever new trend or discoveries or innovations that do exist.
You could really anticipate that whenever there's new then always expect that government would really be trying out their best to have a good grip of it.
Even we do have crypto casinos that currently existing but sooner or later they would really be still heavily regulated despite on making involvement with crypto.


People need to know that government regulating the casino or any other platform is not bad because they just make sure that they are following the legal procedures before they can operate their businesses in their country and it add another extra protection to costumers because we can assure if the casino or platform is well regulated then we can say they are legit ones. Although some part of it maybe government will create laws that required us to pay tax on our crypto income but I think its still fine as long as we can use crypto and can able to continue to use the platforms we want.
@Lanatsa, You have a point but what I don't understand is the reason why they once make a negative statement about Bitcoin when they understand it potential and this is the reason why I dislike politics. They will know the right and instead of them doing something about it in time which will boost or generate more funds for the state they first play their political game.

@Taskford Only naive people won't know that the government will want to regulate every business set or company that's working with crypto but the problem of most crypto investors or enthusiasts is the flaws and possible abuse that comes with the regulation from the government end.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 653
To hide their identity. This is one of the major reasons why people ask others to verify an account using their name.
But do you know it's even riskier using someone else KYC details for your trading/gambling account? Because what if you have a pending transaction that requires facial verification for confirmation, and the person whose details and face you used is either died or has traveled. What will you do at that moment? Because to me, its better to apply using your details or equally avoid such casinos to prevent future unforeseen occurrences, just like the one I experience a few days ago, sending $100 worth of BTC to my Binance account, just for me to try to sell on p2p and I found out that my fund was locked due to the fact that I haven't uploaded proof of my residential address, which I did and a few minutes later fun was released. So imagine if I had used someone else details for my KYC, what do you think would have happened?  
sr. member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 337
I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.
Online casinos do not have to follow up though, that's the difference. If SEC is trying to do something about ETH, that would be only regarding ETH investors in USA, so as a person who is not from there, I won't care about that at all. Same goes with casinos, like they could ban casinos in the USA if they want to, but I would be able to gamble the way I want without care.

What USA needs to understand is that roobet, and all others, are already established in other nations and they can't control it. They like to think that they can control the world but we are getting digital, there is no place to invade, it's all around the world and we can do whatever we want.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1113
There's no need to be upset
<...>

People need to know that government regulating the casino or any other platform is not bad because they just make sure that they are following the legal procedures before they can operate their businesses in their country and it add another extra protection to costumers because we can assure if the casino or platform is well regulated then we can say they are legit ones. Although some part of it maybe government will create laws that required us to pay tax on our crypto income but I think its still fine as long as we can use crypto and can able to continue to use the platforms we want.

from this comment I suppose you live in a country with lower level of corruption than I do and probably more efficiency in government decisions
this is not how the music plays in most of the countries, unfortunately.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1273
You can read the review of Roobet here: ~
We already know about Roobet being legit casino without any doubt and don't want to click on any links here.We have been around here on the forum from a long time and Roobet has proved and build the reputation in the market with so many options for players along with the promotion and events for the community to help them.So we know about it.
Review site can still review top sites which already here for years, so probably their target is the new gamblers looking for the site so let’s not be harsh since he is just sharing some reviews about Roobet, it can only be bad if they put wrong information there. Anyway, what’s new with Roobet? It’s been months now since I gamble with Roobet, is there a new games with Roobet?

The site in question is likely just to feed the owner gambling site referral revenue. There is no clear clarity regarding how the rating system is being adhered to within the site, like what kind of criteria that as in result the current Roobet displayed rating is shown. It is essential for users to choose a platform from a gambling review site objectively based on a specified rate system. But that does not exist on the site.

If you see @sportbettor feedback and post histories, you can simply acknowledge that he is here only for spam.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 728
Anyway, what’s new with Roobet? It’s been months now since I gamble with Roobet, is there a new games with Roobet?
Yes, there's many new games comes up since Hacksaw Gaming and Blueprint Gaming providers has been listed on Roobet. I really like Stack'Em and Mystery Motel on Hacksaw Gaming, while on Blueprint I only like Wild ANTics. It's not really a popular providers, many people will not recognize either the games and the providers.

Roobet have a new promotion of $100K knockout prize to split among 10 random players, the requirement is wager for every $10 to get 1 ticket and you must play on Play'n Go provider.
sr. member
Activity: 2310
Merit: 355
You can read the review of Roobet here: http://100bookies.com/roobet-review/
We already know about Roobet being legit casino without any doubt and don't want to click on any links here.We have been around here on the forum from a long time and Roobet has proved and build the reputation in the market with so many options for players along with the promotion and events for the community to help them.So we know about it.
Review site can still review top sites which already here for years, so probably their target is the new gamblers looking for the site so let’s not be harsh since he is just sharing some reviews about Roobet, it can only be bad if they put wrong information there. Anyway, what’s new with Roobet? It’s been months now since I gamble with Roobet, is there a new games with Roobet?
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 783
The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.
The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.
What would you expect? Government would be always like that, they do really love on touching up everything and would be avoiding that they are letting themselves getting behind on what ever new trend or discoveries or innovations that do exist.
You could really anticipate that whenever there's new then always expect that government would really be trying out their best to have a good grip of it.
Even we do have crypto casinos that currently existing but sooner or later they would really be still heavily regulated despite on making involvement with crypto.


People need to know that government regulating the casino or any other platform is not bad because they just make sure that they are following the legal procedures before they can operate their businesses in their country and it add another extra protection to costumers because we can assure if the casino or platform is well regulated then we can say they are legit ones. Although some part of it maybe government will create laws that required us to pay tax on our crypto income but I think its still fine as long as we can use crypto and can able to continue to use the platforms we want.
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 646
The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.
The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.
What would you expect? Government would be always like that, they do really love on touching up everything and would be avoiding that they are letting themselves getting behind on what ever new trend or discoveries or innovations that do exist.
You could really anticipate that whenever there's new then always expect that government would really be trying out their best to have a good grip of it.
Even we do have crypto casinos that currently existing but sooner or later they would really be still heavily regulated despite on making involvement with crypto.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 650
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.
The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.
hero member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 603
but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.
What is the trouble if you live in a country where gambling is legal? I don't see any problem about it. That's why for those people who live in a country where gambling is illegal, they shouldn't gambling in the first place, if they really want to gamble, they need to change their nationally first. Moving to other countries where your ID are still on your main country doesn't solve the problem if the casino ask your KYC. Your account might be terminated since you're broke their rules.

I am pretty sure just for gambling anyone would go and change their nationality. Lolz. This is why they are using VPN and working with altered IPs. Definitely it’s not the legal way to get what you want and it might be fun for that user to get some money from the gambling site but the problem is for the gambling site owners. They can not just allow anyone to gamble and if any user is found using prohibited services then they always blame the Gambling sites and it could be troublesome for them. This is why most of the gambling sites and exchangers will take strict actions against such peeps and won’t allow them no matter what amount of money is involved.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 728
but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.
What is the trouble if you live in a country where gambling is legal? I don't see any problem about it. That's why for those people who live in a country where gambling is illegal, they shouldn't gambling in the first place, if they really want to gamble, they need to change their nationally first. Moving to other countries where your ID are still on your main country doesn't solve the problem if the casino ask your KYC. Your account might be terminated since you're broke their rules.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1113
There's no need to be upset

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, and more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.
The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.
sr. member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 260
Binance #SWGT and CERTIK Audited

In addition to that, for those people who are still and are planning to sell their identities through verifying different accounts (such as casino account, social media, exchange accounts, etc.) worst is to give documents and verification photos to anyone specially whom that  are unknown for them, you do not want yourself to get in trouble as if those people you've transacted with might have shady transactions being done.
To hide their identity. This is one of the major reasons why people ask others to verify an account using their name.
Jump to: