Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 354. (Read 84536 times)
@Roobet, any chance you can add some games to Serbia? Most of the game you already have are available in Serbian sportsbooks and when i try on roobet it wont let me enter them at all. Any updates on this fix?
Are there any plans for Roobet to add option for Sports betting like some other crypto casinos have?
I am sure that would be nice to have for St. Patricks day, maybe not this year but why not in future have more players = more profit = more bitcoins
Many have already mentioned, requested, asked that if there will also be sports betting here in Roobet. I don't think it's in their plan yet because just like others here say it's just focused now on their current offering games, on consistent promotions and events, it's enough for them right now. But you're right, it would be nice if they also had that, nothing is impossible, we know in the future they will add it to have new players who love to bet on sports.I am sure that would be nice to have for St. Patricks day, maybe not this year but why not in future have more players = more profit = more bitcoins
This discussion will continue as the other site adopt the sportsbook feature in their own casino but in roobet I think they are now in focus on their existing features which I think good for now since they can create more better promotion than spending time on creating sportsbook which it cost time and money for them, although we know they can afford it but for sure they look first the wants of people about that.
Are there any plans for Roobet to add option for Sports betting like some other crypto casinos have?
I am sure that would be nice to have for St. Patricks day, maybe not this year but why not in future have more players = more profit = more bitcoins
Many have already mentioned, requested, asked that if there will also be sports betting here in Roobet. I don't think it's in their plan yet because just like others here say it's just focused now on their current offering games, on consistent promotions and events, it's enough for them right now. But you're right, it would be nice if they also had that, nothing is impossible, we know in the future they will add it to have new players who love to bet on sports. I am sure that would be nice to have for St. Patricks day, maybe not this year but why not in future have more players = more profit = more bitcoins
Younger generation are more towards privacy over the convenience for sure because even successful old people doesn't get the after effects of giving KYC so they always choose to play with fiat but still this is just my opinion and talking generally so having a poll related to this may give better insights.
Younger generations are more aware of why our data is getting collected and what can be done with it, that is the difference. Old people do care about "privacy" as in writing on their facebook walls "I do not allow facebook to use my data ....." stuff but writing on their facebook wall means nothing at all, they do not realize that, then they keep writing and sharing like crazy.Younger generation on the other hand share stuff on instagram and so forth, share their tiktok videos, but the reality is that they are aware of whats being stolen and what it is used for, we all remember that Cambridge Analytica situation and we know how social media could turn to be a political weapon, you can convince enough of your followers to be mad on social media and they will all both support everyone of your party members no matter what they do and be against other party no matter what they do, that social media weapon could be very dangerous and that's what younger generation is trying to refrain from.
Younger generation are more towards privacy over the convenience for sure because even successful old people doesn't get the after effects of giving KYC so they always choose to play with fiat but still this is just my opinion and talking generally so having a poll related to this may give better insights.
Younger generations are more aware of why our data is getting collected and what can be done with it, that is the difference. Old people do care about "privacy" as in writing on their facebook walls "I do not allow facebook to use my data ....." stuff but writing on their facebook wall means nothing at all, they do not realize that, then they keep writing and sharing like crazy.Younger generation on the other hand share stuff on instagram and so forth, share their tiktok videos, but the reality is that they are aware of whats being stolen and what it is used for, we all remember that Cambridge Analytica situation and we know how social media could turn to be a political weapon, you can convince enough of your followers to be mad on social media and they will all both support everyone of your party members no matter what they do and be against other party no matter what they do, that social media weapon could be very dangerous and that's what younger generation is trying to refrain from.
Are there any plans for Roobet to add option for Sports betting like some other crypto casinos have?
I am sure that would be nice to have for St. Patricks day, maybe not this year but why not in future have more players = more profit = more bitcoins
I am sure that would be nice to have for St. Patricks day, maybe not this year but why not in future have more players = more profit = more bitcoins
OK guys, I think it is more than enough to talk about KYC in general.
Lets talk about more related to roobet current updates, promotions, big wins, etc.
Here we go another raffle with $50k prizepool for 10 winners
Play and earn your tickets to get the chance to win one of the $5,000
Lets talk about more related to roobet current updates, promotions, big wins, etc.
Here we go another raffle with $50k prizepool for 10 winners
Play and earn your tickets to get the chance to win one of the $5,000
Honestly I don't get understand what you are standing for. I thought you wanted to implement KYCs on online casinos, but here you are opposing the idea of yours. Casinos has their way figuring suspicious acts on their site, and I'm sure they also are against money laundering. Nonetheless, I don't prefer to undergo KYCs on any online platform such as exchanges and casinos.
I would say that KYC should be a must for exchanges but not for casinos, casino is not something legal in many nations so if we want to gamble on these websites we hide our information and if we are asked KYC that means we can't offer it, since if we do that it would mean that we are accepting doing something illegal. There are people who live in nations that are not against any of this, but that's just a limited number of nations, there are so many places that doesn't allow online crypto gambling and even online fiat gambling, which is why I believe there needs to be some sort of situation where KYC is totally got rid of, wherever that casino needs to be open, they should be open there and let everyone gamble however they want without KYC, find another method of suspicious acts to be resolved because this method is putting me in danger with my law enforcement, even if I did everything right for the casino.
Younger generation are more towards privacy over the convenience for sure because even successful old people doesn't get the after effects of giving KYC so they always choose to play with fiat but still this is just my opinion and talking generally so having a poll related to this may give better insights.
Most people will prefer no KYC process of course with that poll and that's not surprising to see, well, I guess most people here are younger ones, just some wild guess. It will be alright if KYC wasn't that strict for some gambling sites but it will be most prefer if people will just follow what rules and regulations the gambling site is implemented. If they restrict your country then don't play, if they don't allow multiple accounts then don't do so, if VPN isn't allowed then don't, some cases of sites asking KYC was more of those things.
Younger generation are more towards privacy over the convenience for sure because even successful old people doesn't get the after effects of giving KYC so they always choose to play with fiat but still this is just my opinion and talking generally so having a poll related to this may give better insights.
Most people will prefer no KYC process of course with that poll and that's not surprising to see, well, I guess most people here are younger ones, just some wild guess. It will be alright if KYC wasn't that strict for some gambling sites but it will be most prefer if people will just follow what rules and regulations the gambling site is implemented. If they restrict your country then don't play, if they don't allow multiple accounts then don't do so, if VPN isn't allowed then don't, some cases of sites asking KYC was more of those things.I guess this matter on what casino they are on since if the reputable one like roobet will ask that maybe that's not a big deal to comply especially if they want to ask certain verification to know if our account is intact to us especially if we want to withdraw a huge amount or they detect something strange happening.
Many discussions are there about the KYC. There is not really a special guideline where to and where not to use this KYC.
It depends a lot on the jurisdiction, and which bookmaker you want to use. There are bookmakers who always ask KYC, and some of them never do.
It depends a lot on the jurisdiction, and which bookmaker you want to use. There are bookmakers who always ask KYC, and some of them never do.
Younger generation are more towards privacy over the convenience for sure because even successful old people doesn't get the after effects of giving KYC so they always choose to play with fiat but still this is just my opinion and talking generally so having a poll related to this may give better insights.
Most people will prefer no KYC process of course with that poll and that's not surprising to see, well, I guess most people here are younger ones, just some wild guess. It will be alright if KYC wasn't that strict for some gambling sites but it will be most prefer if people will just follow what rules and regulations the gambling site is implemented. If they restrict your country then don't play, if they don't allow multiple accounts then don't do so, if VPN isn't allowed then don't, some cases of sites asking KYC was more of those things. Many players in the crypto gambling world prefer to stay anonym with gambling. That is why we use bitcoins and other currency for. Most users, on the other hands, are familiar with the KYC.
I do not know the rates and population about which group has problems and which one has not, maybe it is interesting to start a poll about this.
ya.ya.yo!
Younger generation are more towards privacy over the convenience for sure because even successful old people doesn't get the after effects of giving KYC so they always choose to play with fiat but still this is just my opinion and talking generally so having a poll related to this may give better insights. I do not know the rates and population about which group has problems and which one has not, maybe it is interesting to start a poll about this.
ya.ya.yo!
this has been a big problem, the fact that most casinos from the start do not ask all customers to do KYC open the way for serious problems at the time of withdrawal or when the customer earns a lot of money because the argument most of the time is: "many accounts that are against TOS" then would spend a lot of time to solve the problem. But if they implemented KYC it would greatly reduce this problem, I know that many people like privacy, but looking at the current scenario I think that only KYC can solve the current problem
Many gambling sites don't allow users to create and own multiple accounts.On Roobet, the gambling site allows one person to have mulitple accounts but it is not for cheating. If you are not sure you already created one account on Roobet long time in the past, you can ask the support team to check it for you.
You can also contact support if you want to create your additional account. If you get response and acceptance from the support team, you can create legit additional accounts. It is obviously your additional accounts can not be used to cheat the gambling site.
The problems from fake scam accusations on gambling sites come from cheaters who broke rules and got punishments with account restrictions or frozen, locked, hold funds. They are not innocent victims.
Quote
You warrant not to create more than one user account. You may create additional accounts when you inform the support regarding your additional accounts so they may be linked together and have jointed KYC and AML verification and checks.
...
If you are unsure if you already registered an account, you may ask the Roobet support team for confirmation or send a second report. The company warrants to not ban or restrict any user for having multiple accounts, as long as the user complies with the KYC-AML policy, does not violate the terms in any other way, or practices in illicit activities banned by the law of the country.
https://roobet.com/ ...
If you are unsure if you already registered an account, you may ask the Roobet support team for confirmation or send a second report. The company warrants to not ban or restrict any user for having multiple accounts, as long as the user complies with the KYC-AML policy, does not violate the terms in any other way, or practices in illicit activities banned by the law of the country.
Many players in the crypto gambling world prefer to stay anonym with gambling. That is why we use bitcoins and other currency for. Most users, on the other hands, are familiar with the KYC.
I do not know the rates and population about which group has problems and which one has not, maybe it is interesting to start a poll about this.
ya.ya.yo!
I do not know the rates and population about which group has problems and which one has not, maybe it is interesting to start a poll about this.
ya.ya.yo!
Only people on the forum could give their experience. Not only for the site, but in general it would be an interesting topic to discuss about.
Not sure if this belongs in this topic, since it is not only relevant for Roobet.com
Roobet.com also has to follow the license from their jurisdiction of course.
Many players in the crypto gambling world prefer to stay anonym with gambling. That is why we use bitcoins and other currency for. Most users, on the other hands, are familiar with the KYC.
I do not know the rates and population about which group has problems and which one has not, maybe it is interesting to start a poll about this.
ya.ya.yo!
I do not know the rates and population about which group has problems and which one has not, maybe it is interesting to start a poll about this.
ya.ya.yo!
Well, until now Roobet has successfully run crypto casino even though there were many competitors before so if they can at the casino why not for the sportsbook
Apart from promotion there must be other ways to attract players, somehow they have to think about it.
Well, that concept has not been successful on competitors. I prefer to remember Roobet as a single casino rather than a mixed gambling platform. The Bitsler and Stake have not successfully achieved the goal as crypto gambling bookies, Roobet will have a higher failure rate too, IMHO. Better to focus on development as a casino.Apart from promotion there must be other ways to attract players, somehow they have to think about it.
The crypto industry continues to grow and more people know about crypto business opportunities are also increasingly open, especially for crypto casinos
Roobet only needs to target new people in the crypto world so this way they have a chance to grow IMO
BTW we continue to talk about the sportsbook here, is there any indication the roobet opened it?It would be the death of crypto casinos IMO if they implement a strict KYC policy. At the moment, It's nice when only members who made big deposits/withdrawals get KYC'ed. Small-time gamblers don't need KYC, and it would be a waste of time.
Agree with both hands, it is the end of crypto casinos if the massive KYC verification gonna hit this business model. The big guys don't care about the small fishes and they will always find alternatives to place their bets. The small gamblers will not even care about the KYC if the total amount is higher than $1000 for verifying the gambling account. 
It would be the death of crypto casinos IMO if they implement a strict KYC policy. At the moment, It's nice when only members who made big deposits/withdrawals get KYC'ed. Small-time gamblers don't need KYC, and it would be a waste of time.
If crypto casinos doing the same KYC policy as the mainstream fiat casinos, I'd rather play on the latter.
If crypto casinos doing the same KYC policy as the mainstream fiat casinos, I'd rather play on the latter.
this has been a big problem, the fact that most casinos from the start do not ask all customers to do KYC open the way for serious problems at the time of withdrawal or when the customer earns a lot of money because the argument most of the time is: "many accounts that are against TOS" then would spend a lot of time to solve the problem. But if they implemented KYC it would greatly reduce this problem, I know that many people like privacy, but looking at the current scenario I think that only KYC can solve the current problem
True, and it can be solved without forcing KYC. For example, don't create promotions that encourage multi-accounting. If there is no incentive to do multi-accounting, it won't be a problem, and KYC won't be necessary. 
Also, crypto casinos just like FIAT casinos enforce wagering requirements in order to prevent money laundering based on what I observed.
this has been a big problem, the fact that most casinos from the start do not ask all customers to do KYC open the way for serious problems at the time of withdrawal or when the customer earns a lot of money because the argument most of the time is: "many accounts that are against TOS" then would spend a lot of time to solve the problem. But if they implemented KYC it would greatly reduce this problem, I know that many people like privacy, but looking at the current scenario I think that only KYC can solve the current problem
-snip-
All related to money will be always ask for KYC, is only optional while the source fund came from a criminal activity because casino one of the way too for money laundering. I know they also can use mixing service, but some of them was also using casino.So, that why even you are not required to do a KYC but when this happens in some casino they will ask you KYC.
Jump to: