Indeed we are dealing with a lot of abusers.
How do you know? What concrete evidence you have?
I will check the POA tomorrow then send the entries to the management to check the multi accounts.
Again, you are missing the POINT. All serious players (especially here) want to have fun in a fair environment – can you provide that? Your retrospective correction measures only address 10% of the problem (in this case 0%). How will DGbet management eliminate cheaters when neither wallet transactions nor IP addresses (since family and friends are allowed) will be considered concrete proof? I have shown you in my earlier post that the 'participation request timing' is highly suspicious and clearly indicates some users creating multiple accounts simultaneously (though they will likely be much smarter about it from now on).
I never claimed that wallet transactions are absolute proof. All I said was that if someone is paying MATIC upon request, just ask for the sender's screenshot of the request (personal messages, etc.). That's exactly why when I mentioned names and wallet addresses of cheaters, your name wasn't included – because I know you can provide proof that member X contacted you to send MATIC.
I'm sorry to say, but you clearly lack the skills (perhaps time and focus too) to host fair poker tournaments. Your entire focus has been on proving that you run a good marketing agency. I have no problem with your approach to business as long as it doesn't waste the time and energy of honest poker players.
I strongly advise you to either choose another marketing strategy for DGbet besides poker tournaments or hand over the tournament management to another skilled, reputable member here.
