From what I see in the past, dooglus' advice and suggestion will get handled much more seriously, but there is no way dooglus can guarantee you will be able to get some kind of reward for reporting the bug.
You either wait for SD's response to discuss the reward yourself, or you send the info to dooglus and risk not getting any reward.
Topic: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game - page 173. (Read 495688 times)
There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".
If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".
If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".
I see the same bug.
Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.
Hey, dooglus i found a big exploit on satoshidice which results in double cashout and negative balance, i know what causes it and i only exploited it once (unintentionally) and i tried reporting it to satoshidice , but they never responded to my email , could you contact them regarding this? i would be willing to share my informaiton for some kind of Reward.
There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".
If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".
If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".
I see the same bug.
Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.
There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".
If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".
If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".
the Mine game doesnt like me , i always loose whenever i play big , i know its just a bad luck 
Why surprised? it will let you play a long time with a smaller bets and when you think you are going good, you raise your bet, computer says "fuck you" and you lose. Right?
That's why provably fair gambling exists.
nice idea good work
the Mine game doesnt like me , i always loose whenever i play big , i know its just a bad luck
Why surprised? it will let you play a long time with a smaller bets and when you think you are going good, you raise your bet, computer says "fuck you" and you lose. Right?
Can you, please, reply to my PM?
I'm not affiliated with SatoshiDice in any way, but can I reply unofficially on their behalf?
"Fuck you, and fuck your ineffective DDoS attacks. We're not paying you a single satoshi."
well, now i snatched it!
Stop spamming in the thread of SatoshiDICE!
well, now i snatched it!
I'll help you reach post 2000...
i#m gonna wait here in the shadows of the giants and jump out to grap the 2000 post right in front of your eyes.
what happens if god starts to play a bitcoin game0 he can choose to win entirely by himself, being omnipotent and all that.
still havent gotten expected results from my gamiing with this site. but at least i am at a plus. when i withdraw a few times ,9
still havent gotten expected results from my gamiing with this site. but at least i am at a plus. when i withdraw a few times ,9
We have listened to your feedback and we will reconstruct the affiliate program. (Thanks dooglus, espringe)
All accounts who referred players will be active affiliate accounts with negative carryover and real-time affiliate earnings. All affiliate accounts who has a positive affiliate balance will get their payments right away.
All future affiliate accounts will be approved-only, The manually approved accounts will have no negative carryover and real-time affiliate earnings.
All accounts who referred players will be active affiliate accounts with negative carryover and real-time affiliate earnings. All affiliate accounts who has a positive affiliate balance will get their payments right away.
All future affiliate accounts will be approved-only, The manually approved accounts will have no negative carryover and real-time affiliate earnings.
Are you basically saying "we're going to come up with a new system and announce it later"?
Because if this is the announcement, I can't understand it at all. I think you're saying that the coins I lost by referring myself stay lost, but I'm not sure about that either.
We will start using a model where affiliates will always earn a small percentage of the house edge, even if the bet was won or lost. Assuming that most affiliates would prefer this, we could convert old affiliates so that they no longer get pay by revenue share.
Quote
I think you're saying that the coins I lost by referring myself stay lost, but I'm not sure about that either.
Depending on what actually happened in your earlier rolls, you might actually get a reward from the winning bets too. but losing bets would give you a lamer reward that they did before.
the Mine game doesnt like me , i always loose whenever i play big , i know its just a bad luck
CoinBase seizes accounts?
It's not like this is a thing they do to every account but depositing to gambling websites (or any business that is considered unlicensed/illegal according to US law) is against their ToS. That' the reason I left coinbase back in August, here's a post I made back then.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/are-you-a-gambler-stay-away-from-coinbase-753606
Also, instant withdrawals and a decent max win are fome features I care about.
How the website pays out
How the website pays out
That's three things I missed from my quickly-assembled list. Thanks.
The last one is interesting. I don't know of any site that makes a concerted effort to protect players from attacks by companies like CoinBase who sometimes confiscate gambler funds.
CoinBase seizes accounts?
Also, instant withdrawals and a decent max win are fome features I care about.
How the website pays out
How the website pays out
That's three things I missed from my quickly-assembled list. Thanks.
The last one is interesting. I don't know of any site that makes a concerted effort to protect players from attacks by companies like CoinBase who sometimes confiscate gambler funds.
Jump to: