Pages:
Author

Topic: Save Gox (Read 11357 times)

vip
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
April 26, 2014, 11:34:05 AM

I'm also in this boat but I'm also skeptical. Why continue to operate the Exchange?


I am very skeptical as well but I have a direct line to John Betts and he has told me about his plan in confidence. I can't give details but I know more info is coming out soon.

Even knowing what I know I'm highly skeptical however option A. letting Japan do it, is not exactly great either.

Honestly my main goal in supporting this is not getting back the coins but wanting so see Mark and the others either go to jail or at least get their assets taken away. Would not be cool if Mark get to keep his $50M USD in fiat. It seems they will try to go after them as sort of good PR for the public. Their plan could work, but I at this time think getting the Japanese Govt to go along with it, as a long shot at this point. Still I'm interested and willing to help get the block of voters I work with to support for this if it can be supported.

We will see in time.


@OgNasty Your bitching and crying is now off topic, lol.  Also your personal threat of violence you sent to me in PM was classic you. Your lies and threats do not hurt me. If this is the only way you can now attack this effort fine, but at least be honest about what you are doing. Other people are trying to do better things here in the BTC world, you are just trying to sabotage good work again like you have since 2011. Grow up little boy. Having part of the discussion on this forum might have been a mistake because of people like you just want to like and troll because you lack anything better to do. There was no reason to go off topic other than to try and make your ego feel better. Hope it worked for you...



I'm going to lock this thread, I'm done with low life trolls. If anyone who can be respectful want's to talk about this somewhere else PM me and I'll keep you in the loop.

donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 25, 2014, 10:04:06 PM
I've been a mtgox customer since 2011.  I can't say I really do care, as I have already chalked up funds left there as a total loss.  I'm just astounded by the arrogance of some guy who actually believed he could purchase the company for 1 BTC because he has deep pockets...  It was a shameful power grab and those in the media and these forums who pretended like this was even a possibility should be embarrassed that their greed and gullibility has been made so public.

Lol, the ignorance of some  Roll Eyes

I'm not saying it is going to work, but there is much more going on than you know about. You are not needed to be in the loop and clearly no one bothered to inform you other than what people in this thread have spent their good time doing. You can bitch and cry all you want but the big boys are hard at work. Keep operating your two bit illegal operation and let us do our thing in an open and legal way.

For the people who do want more info expect more to be made public next week.

Goat, you are not a part of this.  You keep pretending that you have something to offer the Bitcoin community, but you are scum and a scammer.  You are trying to make yourself seem important by posting this stuff along with other stuff you have nothing to do with, like any legitimate person would do business with you.  Keep it real.  You are a douchebag who made some money scamming people by pretending to run businesses that were nothing more than pass-thrus for pirate's operation before Bitcoin rose in value.  You have nothing to add to the community and you pretending that you have any part of any pretend buyout is as shameful as you posting links to other crypto forums hoping to poach members from here. 

In short.  Goat, you are a worthless leech to the Bitcoin community and you have never offered anything worthy of a second look.  You are pathetic and nobody likes or respects you.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1059
April 25, 2014, 09:56:55 PM
You can bitch and cry all you want but the big boys are hard at work.

I'm also in this boat but I'm also skeptical. Why continue to operate the Exchange?
The largest revenue will be the redevelopment of the embezzled Bitcoins. And only for that purpose Gox has to stay alive for a while.
After this Gox can be buried. But before that Karples or his successor(s) have to explain where over half a million Bitcoins ended up or they have to hand out all the data to the community.

Without this Bitcoin is dead overall for me. It remains then in a very strange state and I do not want have anything to do with such racketeering.
For the technical little gizmos that amuse me so I can also use the testnet.



vip
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
April 25, 2014, 08:24:10 PM
I've been a mtgox customer since 2011.  I can't say I really do care, as I have already chalked up funds left there as a total loss.  I'm just astounded by the arrogance of some guy who actually believed he could purchase the company for 1 BTC because he has deep pockets...  It was a shameful power grab and those in the media and these forums who pretended like this was even a possibility should be embarrassed that their greed and gullibility has been made so public.

Lol, the ignorance of some  Roll Eyes

I'm not saying it is going to work, but there is much more going on than you know about. You are not needed to be in the loop and clearly no one bothered to inform you other than what people in this thread have spent their good time doing. You can bitch and cry all you want but the big boys are hard at work. Keep operating your two bit illegal operation and let us do our thing in an open and legal way.

For the people who do want more info expect more to be made public next week.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 25, 2014, 08:13:09 PM
This save gox campaign was a joke.  Offering 1 BTC?  I don't know who is more foolish, the people trying to make a name for themselves with this ridiculous offer, or the idiots who believed this scenario was possible...

Why do you care ?

I've been a mtgox customer since 2011.  I can't say I really do care, as I have already chalked up funds left there as a total loss.  I'm just astounded by the arrogance of some guy who actually believed he could purchase the company for 1 BTC because he has deep pockets...  It was a shameful power grab and those in the media and these forums who pretended like this was even a possibility should be embarrassed that their greed and gullibility has been made so public.
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
April 25, 2014, 03:24:52 PM
This save gox campaign was a joke.  Offering 1 BTC?  I don't know who is more foolish, the people trying to make a name for themselves with this ridiculous offer, or the idiots who believed this scenario was possible...


Why do you care ? Since people like Jr65 say the clients will get zero coins anyway. So where's the risk ? It can't be any worse than zero, no ? But at least there's a chance with the Save Gox campaign.

It seems the clients have to choose between the liquidator selling all the coins with 10 $ per coin and the clients getting zero / and the chance that some investors restore Gox and maybe the clients will get their money back, 20% now and the rest in 5 years.
full member
Activity: 169
Merit: 101
Jon Holmquist
April 25, 2014, 02:03:09 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/investor-group-optimistic-fight-mt-gox-liquidation/
This was in the media again today with more details of the proposed takeover.

It seems clear that the only way creditors will receive more than the 200k BTC is if the company is generating revenue again or if the assets are sold.  Their considerably large customer database of already AML verified users is worth something to another company if they have the banking licenses to use it effectively.

However the way this investor group proposes to restart Gox seems like a terrible deal for the creditors.

Quote
The document suggests that roughly $8m will be needed to fund the rehabilitation, drawing from cash held by Mt. Gox.

Seriously?  The new investors are taking ownership stake and risking none of their own skin entirely at the expense of the creditors?  That is quite absurd.  Do people know what they are signing up for?

This might make sense if the new investors are putting in new money to the tune of $10's of millions.  The currently proposed deal is only upside, which is hardly appropriate.

That was actually the old proposal. I've been told that we will not be dipping into any customer balances.

Hey, bud. Would you be kind as to clarify the "we" in the above?
The Sandlot folks.

Also hi! It has been awhile Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 25, 2014, 01:59:45 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/investor-group-optimistic-fight-mt-gox-liquidation/
This was in the media again today with more details of the proposed takeover.

It seems clear that the only way creditors will receive more than the 200k BTC is if the company is generating revenue again or if the assets are sold.  Their considerably large customer database of already AML verified users is worth something to another company if they have the banking licenses to use it effectively.

However the way this investor group proposes to restart Gox seems like a terrible deal for the creditors.

Quote
The document suggests that roughly $8m will be needed to fund the rehabilitation, drawing from cash held by Mt. Gox.

Seriously?  The new investors are taking ownership stake and risking none of their own skin entirely at the expense of the creditors?  That is quite absurd.  Do people know what they are signing up for?

This might make sense if the new investors are putting in new money to the tune of $10's of millions.  The currently proposed deal is only upside, which is hardly appropriate.

That was actually the old proposal. I've been told that we will not be dipping into any customer balances.

Hey, bud. Would you be kind as to clarify the "we" in the above?
full member
Activity: 169
Merit: 101
Jon Holmquist
April 25, 2014, 11:12:03 AM
http://www.coindesk.com/investor-group-optimistic-fight-mt-gox-liquidation/
This was in the media again today with more details of the proposed takeover.

It seems clear that the only way creditors will receive more than the 200k BTC is if the company is generating revenue again or if the assets are sold.  Their considerably large customer database of already AML verified users is worth something to another company if they have the banking licenses to use it effectively.

However the way this investor group proposes to restart Gox seems like a terrible deal for the creditors.

Quote
The document suggests that roughly $8m will be needed to fund the rehabilitation, drawing from cash held by Mt. Gox.

Seriously?  The new investors are taking ownership stake and risking none of their own skin entirely at the expense of the creditors?  That is quite absurd.  Do people know what they are signing up for?

This might make sense if the new investors are putting in new money to the tune of $10's of millions.  The currently proposed deal is only upside, which is hardly appropriate.

That was actually the old proposal. I've been told that we will not be dipping into any customer balances.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 24, 2014, 02:52:05 PM
This save gox campaign was a joke.  Offering 1 BTC?  I don't know who is more foolish, the people trying to make a name for themselves with this ridiculous offer, or the idiots who believed this scenario was possible...

William Quigley, who worked at Disney the same time Brock Peirce did, explains the 1 BTC offer here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k9UCRbGD4Y
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 24, 2014, 10:58:00 AM
This save gox campaign was a joke.  Offering 1 BTC?  I don't know who is more foolish, the people trying to make a name for themselves with this ridiculous offer, or the idiots who believed this scenario was possible...
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
April 24, 2014, 08:56:38 AM
It seems to me like this whole thing, as it relates to people who had fiat or coins in gox, comes down to:

Choice #1:
Support this and get 23% of what you had, but not be able to move it out of gox for 1 year.
You can get paid back for the rest of the loss over time if this exchange does well.

Choice #2:
Don't support this, liquidation will happen.  You will get (at current exchange rates) about 27.5% of what you had.
Lawyers fees and any other debts gox had that we don't' know about could reduce the 27.5% number..




Or the choice nr 3, the option which most here will say it will happen :
 Mark Karpeles will pay himself most of the money because corruption and bla bla, the lawyers will get most of the money because bla bla... , the liquidator will sell all 200k btc with 10 $ per btc to an acquaintance of his because corruption bla bla... and of course the users will get zero, or maybe some pennies.  So... what to choose ?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
April 24, 2014, 04:07:14 AM
Hi Bruno, I haven't seen a good old fashioned wall of text in a week. How was your vacation?
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 24, 2014, 02:09:48 AM
From the Sunlot proposal:

"Sunlot Holdings Limited is a special-purpose investment vehicle registered in Republic of Cyprus".

Not a good sign.

Did I give you permission to read ahead?  Wink

Here's a video where William Quigley expresses how he's put together a great team to oversee the new Mt Gox: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k9UCRbGD4Y

For those asking themselves if William Quigley ever worked for Disney like Brock Pierce has, the answer is yes.

To put this thread in context, if Hal Finney is Satoshi Nakamoto and is reading this thread, Mrs. Finney is currently having a very difficult time reading his eye movements to get a bearing as to what Hal's saying/thinking.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
April 24, 2014, 02:03:54 AM
#99
From the Sunlot proposal:

"Sunlot Holdings Limited is a special-purpose investment vehicle registered in Republic of Cyprus".

Not a good sign.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 24, 2014, 02:02:48 AM
#98
I couldn't help but notice that nobody with a spine has weighed in on this subject probably because they don't want to be attached to chiming in on the wrong side of the fence bearing Brock Pierce's name.

If you recall the perks that Mark Karpeles doled out during his tenure at Mt Gox, you're going to love this next tidbit: http://www.lewterslounge.com/2008/01/rise-and-fall-of-ige.html

Quote
Internal management problems and inappropriate use of funds:

Management seemed to be a problem as the most competent executives, Yantis, Alan and Randy had left the company. Brock Pierce was called incompetent. Even though the company was facing tough times and owed millions to gold farmers, Pierce was said to travel by private jet.

Again, feel free to read the entire fascinating article.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 24, 2014, 01:14:48 AM
#97
I might as well add this, for I just found it after several attempts: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:RYF8vkh-UIoJ:www.bannerwitcoff.com/patentarcade/docs/DebonnevillePierceAmendedComplaint.pdf+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us (Google cache oppose to PDF)

Quote
II. PARTIES

2. Alan Debonneville is a Swiss citizen domiciled in Hong Kong, China.

3. Brock Pierce is an individual who resides in California may be served at 8010 Oceanus Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90046-2047.

4. This is a case in which one of the two founders of a company which was valued at over $220,000,000.00 is now suing the other founder due to, among other things, numerous breaches of fiduciary duty, breaches of contract, and fraud.

5. For almost 5 years, Debonneville has dedicated his entire life to the creation, development, and success of IGE US, LLC (“IGE”). IGE’s meteoric rise from an under funded startup to the market leader culminated in a Goldman-Sachs investment of $60,000,000, which set the value of IGE at the time of $220,000,000. Where Pierce has always been the public face of IGE, Debonneville has been the tireless working founder, responsible for the expansion and operation of the company. Pierce has taken advantage of Debonneville on numerous occasions including:

1. Stealing shares of IGE which should have been given to Debonneville;
2. Denying Debonneville the right to sell his stock; and
3. Excluding Debonneville from participating in a $20,000,000 stock sale which benefited only Pierce.

These are but a few of the actions for which Debonneville now brings suit.

Feel free to read all 20 pages of the complaint, for it's an interesting read, paying close attention when you toward the end, i.e...

Quote
82. In a few weeks, Debonneville heard through the grapevine that Yantis was in fact back to working for IGE. Debonneville contacted Pierce regarding the terms between IGE and Yantis and was advised that Yantis had been given the entire trading arm of IGE, and Yantis paid no consideration other than a 5% royalty in return. Considering the low price paid by Yantis, it is entirely possible that Pierce did reach a side deal with Yantis, just as Yantis had previously said Pierce would.

In case you forgot where you've seen that Yantis name before, allow me to remind you...

http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=886929F6-0D1B-0385-6B9A8A97D17C38B1

Quote
The site cites as its backers Bitcoin investor Brock Pierce, entrepreneur Jonathan Yantis, venture capitalists William Quigley and Matthew Roszak, and John Betts, described as a Wall Street veteran. Earlier this months, reports said the consortium was offering 1 bitcoin (roughly US$490 at current prices) to buy Mt. Gox.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 24, 2014, 12:39:08 AM
#96

Nice read, thanks. That's the problem with trusting a company. How do you know the owner isn't completely nuts?

You should have know he was in 2011 when he went around this forum claiming his customers were terrorist and money launders for following the instructions Mark gave himself.

Yeah, guess that's true. We all should have seen it coming but hindsight is 20-20.

i was trying to warn people.

I remember Goat. You tried to warn people as early as the end of 2011 about Gox at the same time I was warning people about pirate. We should have listened to each other.  Wink

Is this only a twosome, or can I turn this convo into a ménage à trois? Talking-about-old-times speaking, that is.

Speaking of old times and speakeasies, do you, two, remember this thread? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pattaya-39476 ? Do you recall the fall guy's name? Do you recall the allegations directed at said fall guy, hence his leaving on his own accord?

Fast forward to what I penned ~18 hours ago:




But, at least I got to do some reading while on hiatus.

http://web.archive.org/web/20080117004139/http://radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2007/11/den_chads_world_marc_collins_rector_1.php

Quote
One of the alleged victims was identified as Mike E. The slim, dark-haired 14-year-old, who attended a small private high school in the Valley, befriended Chad's brother Scott, who led him to DEN. Mike had an interest in acting, so when Collins-Rector outlined the possibilities for stardom offered by the site, the boy began spending time at the mansion, where there was one key rule. He recalls: "If you were going to sleep over, you had to get into either the pool or the hot tub—and you had to be naked to do so." In an exclusive interview, Mike E. confirms having been forced to engage in anal and oral intercourse with Collins-Rector, Shackley, and Pierce while under the influence of drugs that he claims were fed to him without his knowledge. At the same time, he says, Collins-Rector and Shackley were pushing him to become a legally emancipated minor. Although Ronald Palmieri, Collins-Rector's lawyer at the time, dismisses the allegations, saying, "There was never any such discussion that I know of," Radar has obtained correspondence sent by Shackley to Palmieri's law office requesting an update on the status of Mike E.'s emancipation filing.

Here's a story from the same source, but one had to be redacted due to a lawyer's request. Thankfully, The Way Back Machine archived the original. I suggest reading/comparing both to get the full picture.

Quote
Editor’s Note: At the request of Brock Pierce’s attorneys, this article has been edited to remove three passages summarizing portions of the now-sealed complaint. Although the complaint was filed June 11 and publicly available for more than three months before Pierce’s attorneys had it sealed, it was eventually sealed, and they have provided an order signed by the judge that establishes this.

http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/30/ige-pierce-debonneville-complaint/
http://web.archive.org/web/20080202014535/http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/30/ige-pierce-debonneville-complaint/

For those into not-so-light-reading, I suggest: The Decline and Fall of an Ultra Rich Online Gaming Empire

Quote
Pierce was 19 at the time and hardly the first young American male to step away from the sometimes painful light of reality for an extended, free-falling obsession with an online fantasy videogame. But it’s safe to say that the reality he was shrinking from in 2000 was not that of a typical teen. At 16, Pierce had retired from a career as a modestly successful Hollywood child actor; by 18 he was a dazzlingly successful dotcom entrepreneur, living large on a $250,000 executive salary and the promise of millions more in post-IPO equity. By his 19th birthday he had lost it all. Pierce’s high-profile startup had flamed out in a blaze of scandal that included accusations of sex with minors, and he and his cofounders had found it prudent to leave the US. He lived now in a rented house in a strange country, on the dwindling remains of a crash-ravaged stock portfolio.

All the above is on the heels of what was in the news yesterday: Man accusing 'X-Men' director of sex abuse sues more Hollywood execs

Luckily for those who love Bitcoin, like my self, names mentioned in the articles I linked above are trying to save our beloved Mt Gox: U.S. investor says creditors support Mt. Gox buyout

Quote
According to three people close to the matter, Sunlot, which is led by bitcoin entrepreneur Brock Pierce and includes venture capitalists Matthew Roszak and William Quigley, has agreed to buy a 12% stake in Mt. Gox from founder Jed McCaleb, who sold the rest of the exchange to Chief Executive Mark Karpelès in 2011.

Unfortunately, I feel that 1 BTC is too small an offer, thus I propose we double it to 2 BTC. Yes, it's a lot of money, but I further propose we amass the funds via a Group Buy. I further propose that we put Mt Gox in reliable hands (below) and move it to some other city like Pattaya, whereupon the results would be the same, but at least we'll get more entertainment value outta the endeavor.





~Bruno Kucinskas

http://web.archive.org/web/20080202014535/http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/30/ige-pierce-debonneville-complaint/

Quote
The fifty-seven page Complaint alleges that Pierce “has taken advantage of Debonneville on numerous occasions including … stealing shares that should have been given to Debonneville, denying Debonneville the right to sell his stock, and excluding Debonneville from a $20,000,000 stock sale which benefited only Pierce.”

In essence, this is what the Mt Gox deal consist of:

Mt Gox, once a fantasy trading card company turn crypto-currency stock exchange, will be handed over for the large sum of 1 BTC (~$500 USD at this penning) to an entity that once traded virtually currencies but, when it folded, one of its main stockholders was left with nothing even though he ran the biz while the main dude was residing behind bars addressing paedo- allegations in a country known for Running of the Bulls. (trust me, it gets better)

The new entity overseeing Mt Gox promises to make its customers as whole as possible provided they pay for the service, and we know their promise will be good, for if you visit the last link above, you'll witness first-hand this to be true.

Meanwhile, The Mighty Ducks actor has a vested interest in KnC who, BTW, is happily mining away on ~7,000 bitcoin miners, of which their customer base are not happy campers once that was revealed.

Question: What does a guy named John Betts (interesting name, you think?) smoke so that he believes Mt Gox can be revived and turn a profit with an alleged paedo- at the helm, when the last Bitcoiner, justly or unjustly, accused of such is no longer around due to fellow bitcoiners no longer wanting to deal with him?

There's a helluva lot more I could add to all the above, but I'll simply stop right here so that those who took, or are still taking the slow bus to school can absorb what's been expressed to date.

~Bruno Kucinskas

PS: When the smoke settles, perhaps Mark Karpeles could reunite with his ex-roomie, whereupon he'll hold doors open for him once again.

legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
April 23, 2014, 11:10:40 PM
#95

"Karpeles wanted to be liked, three former employees say. He bought lunch for the entire staff and spent thousands of dollars on gadgets and equipment to make the office more "fun" - exercise balls for chairs, beer steins and robots. Late last year, in the middle of increasingly strained times for Mt. Gox, he spent an afternoon putting up a hammock in the recreation room.

But staff found it galling that the boss was buying these goodies even while he refused to give pay raises. They also became frustrated as they waited for Karpeles to authorise decisions or make progress on simple tasks. Developers, stuck without direct access to the Mt. Gox source code, resorted to playing video games, people inside the company at the time say.

Employees were also concerned that Karpeles' tight grip on all company affairs was causing a bottleneck: he was the only person who could access the exchange's bank accounts and bitcoin holdings and resolve requests by traders to cash out."


Criminal or wasteful stupidity?
Looks like both at the same time.



No absolutely not

Massive mental illness. Personality disorder, schizophrenia etc.

MK, the Joker of Bitcoinland



"Mental illness" is not an excuse for crime.
People are still responsible for their actions.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
April 23, 2014, 10:02:52 PM
#94
It seems to me like this whole thing, as it relates to people who had fiat or coins in gox, comes down to:

Choice #1:
Support this and get 23% of what you had, but not be able to move it out of gox for 1 year.
You can get paid back for the rest of the loss over time if this exchange does well.

Choice #2:
Don't support this, liquidation will happen.  You will get (at current exchange rates) about 27.5% of what you had.
Lawyers fees and any other debts gox had that we don't' know about could reduce the 27.5% number..


Pages:
Jump to: