Scammer: Dank | Bitcointalksearch.org

malevolent

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 1724

Quote from: ?? on ??

Agreed, the moderators have a responsibility to protect this forum from scammers like Dank.

Moderators have no such responsibility, however it is nice of them to help in identifying them.
Their responsibility is to maintain order, you are supposed to do your own due diligence. Usually it is not worth sending money for something that sounds too good to be true. I myself have had to learn this lesson twice, 2nd time was from this forum.

Fluttershy

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: ZenInTexas on October 28, 2012, 01:07:13 PM

This silly. However, by the moderators own rules, a serious investigation is needed. And an outcome should be published.

If the moderators don't follow their own rules of the "Scam Accusation" sub group, it will be because they dislike the OP. Anyway, if the OP wanted to prove a point, that the moderators have their own agenda & bias... Unfortunately, we might be waiting forever. So I have to ask, does a non-response really confirm that point?

If the moderators want to prove they are un-biased, this would seem to be a slam-dunk....otherwise this should serve as a warning to all newbies, bitcointalk.org a dangerous place, where no one can be held accountable for their actions.

I agree, even though the starter of the topic is unpopular, that should be no reason to ignore a claim.

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: AndrewBUD on October 30, 2012, 04:15:46 PM

Quote from: bitcoinbear on October 30, 2012, 04:11:50 PM

Quote from: jwzguy on October 28, 2012, 01:09:14 PM

Would you guys give this absolute nonsense a rest? Pretty please?

Well we were about to ignore this completely, but then you went and bumped the thread, so now everybody has to post more.

To keep things on topic, has Dank ever successfully brought an idea to fruition on this forum? Maybe instead of a scammer tag he should just get a "loser with big ideas" tag?

be nice.

Yes please, both counts. a) Be nice and b) don't touch this thread ever again. It's a steaming pile o' crap, like most of Rarity's threads and posts.

AndrewBUD

hero member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 502

Quote from: bitcoinbear on October 30, 2012, 04:11:50 PM

Quote from: jwzguy on October 28, 2012, 01:09:14 PM

Would you guys give this absolute nonsense a rest? Pretty please?

Well we were about to ignore this completely, but then you went and bumped the thread, so now everybody has to post more.

To keep things on topic, has Dank ever successfully brought an idea to fruition on this forum? Maybe instead of a scammer tag he should just get a "loser with big ideas" tag?

be nice.

bitcoinbear

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: jwzguy on October 28, 2012, 01:09:14 PM

Would you guys give this absolute nonsense a rest? Pretty please?

Well we were about to ignore this completely, but then you went and bumped the thread, so now everybody has to post more.

To keep things on topic, has Dank ever successfully brought an idea to fruition on this forum? Maybe instead of a scammer tag he should just get a "loser with big ideas" tag?

jwzguy

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1002

Would you guys give this absolute nonsense a rest? Pretty please?

ZenInTexas

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

This silly. However, by the moderators own rules, a serious investigation is needed. And an outcome should be published.

If the moderators don't follow their own rules of the "Scam Accusation" sub group, it will be because they dislike the OP. Anyway, if the OP wanted to prove a point, that the moderators have their own agenda & bias... Unfortunately, we might be waiting forever. So I have to ask, does a non-response really confirm that point?

If the moderators want to prove they are un-biased, this would seem to be a slam-dunk....otherwise this should serve as a warning to all newbies, bitcointalk.org a dangerous place, where no one can be held accountable for their actions.

AndrewBUD

hero member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 502

Since when is paraphernalia illegal? Last time I was in Michigan I swear they had head shops...

Canada is covered in them........ I think the post above belongs to a butt hurt little pony....

repentance

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dank on October 26, 2012, 04:17:10 PM

Yeah, it's definitely not DankGlass!

Are you admitting that you lied when you said that you'd abandoned DankGlass and that someone paid you to use the logo? That would bring bad karma, dank.

dank

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1002

You cannot kill love

Quote from: Jimmy Diamond on October 26, 2012, 03:02:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinbear on October 26, 2012, 12:04:50 PM

Quote from: dank on October 23, 2012, 12:46:18 PM

Quote from: MildBill on October 23, 2012, 10:07:05 AM

Quote from: dank on October 22, 2012, 10:06:42 PM

Quote from: repentance on October 22, 2012, 09:00:22 PM

Quote from: AndrewBUD on October 22, 2012, 07:26:33 PM

How many accounts does this rarity person have?

I'd be more interested in knowing how many accounts dank has.

2.

Isn't that the same number of depositors your 'bank' has?

Dank Bank has had 8. I think anyone with a brain cell knows which other account is mine.

I have no idea which other account is Dank's. I have at least one brain cell. Therefore, Dank is lying again.

In all reality, I just don't care enought to try to figure out who else is Dank.

It's pretty obvious what the other account is when you consider it.

Yeah, it's definitely not DankGlass!

Bitcoin Oz

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Wat

Quote from: AndrewBUD on October 23, 2012, 10:15:09 AM

I would be more inclined to deposit with someone that said... I buy drugs off SR and sell them IRL... Cheesy

Thats a business plan at least. A lot more profitable than bitcoin mining.

Korbman

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Jimmy Diamond on October 26, 2012, 03:02:29 PM

It's pretty obvious what the other account is when you consider it.

Lolz Dank just talks to himself Tongue

Jimmy Diamond

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: bitcoinbear on October 26, 2012, 12:04:50 PM

Quote from: dank on October 23, 2012, 12:46:18 PM

Quote from: MildBill on October 23, 2012, 10:07:05 AM

Quote from: dank on October 22, 2012, 10:06:42 PM

Quote from: repentance on October 22, 2012, 09:00:22 PM

Quote from: AndrewBUD on October 22, 2012, 07:26:33 PM

How many accounts does this rarity person have?

I'd be more interested in knowing how many accounts dank has.

2.

Isn't that the same number of depositors your 'bank' has?

Dank Bank has had 8. I think anyone with a brain cell knows which other account is mine.

I have no idea which other account is Dank's. I have at least one brain cell. Therefore, Dank is lying again.

In all reality, I just don't care enought to try to figure out who else is Dank.

It's pretty obvious what the other account is when you consider it.

bitcoinbear

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: dank on October 23, 2012, 12:46:18 PM

Quote from: MildBill on October 23, 2012, 10:07:05 AM

Quote from: dank on October 22, 2012, 10:06:42 PM

Quote from: repentance on October 22, 2012, 09:00:22 PM

Quote from: AndrewBUD on October 22, 2012, 07:26:33 PM

How many accounts does this rarity person have?

I'd be more interested in knowing how many accounts dank has.

2.

Isn't that the same number of depositors your 'bank' has?

Dank Bank has had 8. I think anyone with a brain cell knows which other account is mine.

I have no idea which other account is Dank's. I have at least one brain cell. Therefore, Dank is lying again.

In all reality, I just don't care enought to try to figure out who else is Dank.

greyhawk

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 1009