Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 179. (Read 845809 times)

Simple answer is that when something exists or is made their is a creator, so this earth and universe would never had been created Itslef but there is a creator... Thats a fact..

Err... Anybody see the name Astargath as the one who posted? Looks like Astargath said it, not me.

Episode 17 - 'The shameful fall of a retard named Badecker'. There is not much to say, as you can all read what that idiot posted. After pushing everyone aside and asking only for 'scientific' proof or disproof, after claiming that God exists because he believes that simply combining some laws might prove it, after being bossy and authoritarian to people who asked him how could he know it is God, after many other shit he has said here, Badecker comes out of the closet and admits he doesn't know it's God (assuming his theory would be correct, although it is not). He also says that 'Nobody is made to be able to think that way'. Why all that struggle then? If his God created him in such a way that he would never be able to know that God is the creator of the universe, why all the messages, the revelation, the bible, the need for belief and prayers? Does not seem like that God likes to be discovered, acknowledged or praised. Above all, how can someone who doesn't know for sure that God exists claim scientific proof for it and hang on for dear life to his theory? How can the same person be religious although he is aware he doesn't know shit about something that he calls the Creator? Why try to impose his views, be them scientific or religious on a subject that he is aware he can never know anything of? Well, we have the answer written by Badecker himself: 'Just to please you, however, let me say that my religion is that the Creator is the God of the Bible'. It's just a religious propaganda, it's his religion that pushes him to try by all means to prove they are right, even when he is out of his league, on subjects that he is not prepared for. His scientific proof has a religious purpose, a religious cause and a religious motif behind, yet Badecker asks everyone to stay scientific and not bring religion in the discussion. That is why he is stupid, he doesn't even know what he is doing, he only knows why: because he is religious. That is a very important step in our proof that Badecker is a stupid apologist. Let us all thank the apologist, he has made our work much easier. We might not even need 100 episodes for it. Stay tuned, shit is hitting the fan.

So you just admitted that you don't know that is God, lol. Yes and that something can be many things, so we agree then.

This topic is not about believing in God. This topic is about the scientific proof that God exists. It's about believing the scientists who have formulated the scientific proof; it's not about believing in God.

Why are you bringing religion into it? This is a science topic. Why do I have to answer your religious questions in a science topic? I don't. So, you stop being a bitch... can you, even?

Just to please you, however, let me say that my religion is that the Creator is the God of the Bible. It seems that your religion is not that.

Scientifically speaking, I don't know what the Creator really is. How can someone of the universe, who thinks according to the laws of the way the universe is and works, conceive of something that is completely outside of the universe and its laws... at least in part? Nobody is made to be able to think that way.

At the same time, cause and effect, entropy, and complexity point towards that "Something" that we can't fathom, as being the Creator.

The question isn't one of me not explaining. The question is one of why you won't accept the proof that is so evident, right in front of you, when it has been explained over and over to you.

Yaa! I think so 

I laugh when I hear this sort of comment:
there is a god for the people that need a god, something to believe in, something to allow them to live the day to day life.
But then maybe others are using god as a tool to keep peace and order, which is not working these days,

i do not believe in god, I do not believe in Allah and I do not believe in Adam and Eve as the start to the human race.
I have often wondered if we were put on this planet by some other alien force making up for the different colors of races.
is there scientific answers to the different bone structure of each and everyone of us, time has maybe been good to some , others are different.
but a god! no way.
Even the bible was created/written by man and I do not believe that man with all there superstitions were correct
look at this world of today, we can't live in peace with each other even with your so called gods.
the Moslem's seem to prove that,

the churches make me sick even though I was bought up as a christian, I no longer believe there could have been a god.
Science always proves beyond doubt and I know they have not done that

None of them point anywhere specific in terms of what made everything. You said the creator is God from the Bible and I asked you, how do you know, you don't answer, yet again. Your 4 links that you always post are supposed to show there is a creator or that something created us, fair enough, I'm pretending it's true, you still don't answer the question of how do you know what the creator actually is and how do you know he is a God and not something else. Stop avoiding the question, don't be a bitch.

Episode 16: 'Dirty, dirty Badecker'.
Although we try to prove his level of stupidity, in this case I know for sure he is only being an asshole, a frustrated son of a virgin whore. There he is, imposing to Astargath to ask the questions that he wants to be asked, if not, to get out of here. He has an authority frustration, we already know that from the sunglasses emoji that he always posts at the end of his bullshit posts as if he owned someone. Is Astargath right and on topic asking that question? Of course he is, it is a logical question and it is necessary for the claim of a God. What Badecker does is simply rejecting a question to which he has no answer and which blows away his whole pseudo scientific theory. He knows it's like that, he knows his battle is lost in the second he answers to that question so the son of a bitch will reject it and try to act tough, like a cornered dog. So this my friends, is the proof that Badecker is actually really bad intentioned, not just stupid. He has a propaganda agenda and he will push it as much as he can, rejecting the truth and those who oppose him. He claims absolute and irrefutable truth and he wants us to acknowledge him or get out. That is religious fanaticism, that is the same moral that pushes islamist terrorists to act a they do. Stay close, friends, we shall have more from him.

There is the rich and there is the poor, it is a sign that is so scientific existence of god

Hi, HWW. Thanks again for helping to forward the understanding that there is proof for God. You continually do it so well by not being able to come up with any rebuttal for the proof.

There are lots of questions. Why pick on this one? Are you setting me up to be some kind of authority? Research cause and effect, entropy, and complexity if you want authority.

This is the scientific proof that God exists, thread. Ask your other questions elsewhere. Maybe even start your own topic(s).

No, no, let's pretend you are right and what you said points to a ''creator''. The question is, how do you know who the creator is? What is your evidence or proof that it is the christian God and not aliens from another dimension or that we are living in a computer simulation?

there's no proof, but you shouldn't need it

Interlude: The eternal sunshine of a retard named Badecker.
After hundreds of pages in which it has been stated and proved clearly that religion means believing in a deity, not acknowledging scientific facts, Badecker still calls atheists, the exact opposite of the term, religious. He also accuses others of something that he does, sometimes on purpose, sometimes just because he is stupid, and he goes so far that he accuses people that actually gave attention to his links. Example: 'you will simply believe and blab anything that you want no matter what is said.' That is what Badecker actually does with every post and he accused Astargath of doing it although Astargath actually countered really well and on point to anything he said. Further on, there is a new side to our little redard (little as in puny, his retard is big): conspiracy. Somehow he came up with the idea that science and everything we have today (including the computer that our retard uses) are only there to debunk cause and effect because he believes cause and effect prove God. Of course, anyone who actually studied cause and effect understand that it has many theories, including the theological one, which is also the most illogical one since it's a copy of causal determinism that solely replaced the word 'cause' with the word 'God'. He then goes into a subject that he knows nothing about, free will, also proving in the same time that he knows nothing about cause and effect (again, anyone who actually studied cause and effects understands the classical problem between it and free will). He ends up in his fanatic way, proving the point of my last episode: he claims that in order to debunk the God idea, you need to prove that this world is actually fake, it does not exist. That is what debunking scientific laws that work would mean. He implies that God exists because the world exists, no further explanations. He is basic, poorly documented, stupid and hypocrite. He can not argue, he can not debate, he can barely speak in a reasonable way. Yet, his stupidity never fails to amaze us. Indeed, we are witnessing the eternal sunshine of a retard named Badecker. Stay tuned, he's getting dumber!

There is no reason to respond to your posts. When you talk religion like you do, you will simply believe and blab anything that you want no matter what is said.

Pick a point that you have debunked, and list it and the debunking... in simple, brief language, from your own understanding.

Cause and effect alone has almost proven that God exists. Almost all scientific investigation has as its goal, a way to debunk cause and effect, by finding something that is pure random. The particular scientist doing the research on a particular science project may not know that his science will be analyzed for proving cause and effect to be false, but it will.

Cause and effect shows programming of everything in the universe... even so-called free will. Programming needs a Programmer.

To debunk God scientifically, you will have to debunk cause and effect, entropy, complexity, or at least one of them.

You lost your fuel badecker, I'm still waiting for your response to my latest post, not to mention that I already debunked all your ''proof''. Maybe it's time for you to abandon this thread and search for another because you have been destroyed here, just saying, as friendly advice.

That's just another one of the things YOU aren't smart enough to do... search my links and find rebuttal in them.

Many scientist proof that god actually exist some of  them are finding proofs until today just to proof that god actually exist, tho some of the activist and anti god revoke it. but god actually exist.