Why are you bringing religion into it? This is a science topic. Why do I have to answer your religious questions in a science topic? I don't. So, you stop being a bitch... can you, even?
Just to please you, however, let me say that my religion is that the Creator is the God of the Bible. It seems that your religion is not
that.Scientifically speaking, I don't know what the Creator really is. How can someone of the universe, who thinks according to the laws of the way the universe is and works, conceive of something that is completely outside of the universe and its laws... at least in part? Nobody is made to be able to think that way.
At the same time, cause and effect, entropy, and complexity point towards
that "Something" that we can't fathom, as being the Creator.
The question isn't one of me not explaining. The question is one of why you won't accept the proof that is so evident, right in front of you, when it has been explained over and over to you.
Episode 17 - 'The shameful fall of a retard named Badecker'. There is not much to say, as you can all read what that idiot posted. After pushing everyone aside and asking only for 'scientific' proof or disproof, after claiming that God exists because he believes that simply combining some laws might prove it, after being bossy and authoritarian to people who asked him how could he know it is God, after many other shit he has said here, Badecker comes out of the closet and admits he doesn't know it's God (assuming his theory would be correct, although it is not). He also says that 'Nobody is made to be able to think that way'. Why all that struggle then? If his God created him in such a way that he would never be able to know that God is the creator of the universe, why all the messages, the revelation, the bible, the need for belief and prayers? Does not seem like that God likes to be discovered, acknowledged or praised. Above all, how can someone who doesn't know for sure that God exists claim scientific proof for it and hang on for dear life to his theory? How can the same person be religious although he is aware he doesn't know shit about something that he calls the Creator? Why try to impose his views, be them scientific or religious on a subject that he is aware he can never know anything of? Well, we have the answer written by Badecker himself: 'Just to please you, however, let me say that my religion is that the Creator is the God of the Bible'. It's just a religious propaganda, it's his religion that pushes him to try by all means to prove they are right, even when he is out of his league, on subjects that he is not prepared for. His scientific proof has a religious purpose, a religious cause and a religious motif behind, yet Badecker asks everyone to stay scientific and not bring religion in the discussion. That is why he is stupid, he doesn't even know what he is doing, he only knows why: because he is religious. That is a very important step in our proof that Badecker is a stupid apologist. Let us all thank the apologist, he has made our work much easier. We might not even need 100 episodes for it. Stay tuned, shit is hitting the fan.
I just wanted to thank you, again, for helping people to understand that science proves the existence of God. I know you are doing it unwillingly. But God is seeing to it that you do it, anyway. So, even though you don't really deserve it, thanks, anyway.
Since you are continually supporting the fact of the scientific proof of the existence of God, why don't you turn and believe in God, and then find Jesus salvation. If you do, you will be rewarded with everlasting life, rather than a simple, little reward in this life, for helping to support the scientific proof that God exists, by talking a lot, but never rebutting it.