You're still too ignorant to understand the answer, I see.
EDIT: You and stats should head over to the local tavern together. The tavern patrons and the bartender would get the biggest laugh ever watching you two try to order a couple of drinks.
Maybe whilst at the tavern the entire place could discuss how ignorant you are.
We could even discuss how you believe it is appropriate for children to marry. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1969184
You are a twisted individual BADecker.
I don't really think this should pass unobserved, regardless the fact that Badecker calls anyone a troll or not. I've kept talking about the lack of morality on most apologists, but this is a little bit beyond. A creep who pretends to understands science claims that 12, for girls, and 14, for boys, is a good age for marriage. Of course, marriage implies sexual intercourse, it may also allow pregnancy, etc. Nowadays, a big majority of people who get married experience a divorce at a certain time, mostly because we still fail to communicate properly and we make really bad choices being influenced, at many times, by the chemistry of attraction. A simple relationship requires understanding, cohabitation, cooperation, and many other social 'talents' that the human being possesses, a 12 or 14 year old is not even close to behave like that, let alone the fact that such a thing would interact and ruin the beautiful and sincere process of childhood. Of course some religious people, especially christians nowadays, have no problem with having sexual intercourse with a 12 or 14 year old, they actually believe it's right and healthy. We can observe the same behavior on our friend Badecker. I'm not accusing him of molesting children, I am highlighting a lack of morality, or better said, the presence of a specifically religious immorality in his behavior. Check the link and you will see his answer after stats actually asked him 'what the fuck?'. He posted some links (typically of him) of some laws from Massachusetts, as if that would make it right. Conclusion: now we know he is stupid, most probably mentally ill and he also lacks morality, since his morality is 'God given', and as we all know, his God, the 'scientifically' proved one, only gave 10 commandments...child abuse is not part of them. Stay tuned folks, our Badkecker shows his faces with every post.
P.S. He won't ever answer to these accusations, he will just say it's 'trolling or religious talk' and he will try to go around it by claiming that this does not rebut his 'science'.
Well, that's not true. All anyone has to do is rebut the science of cause and effect, entropy, or complexity to show that God doesn't exist. That shouldn't be so hard for you multi-talented trolls. Come on now. Do some rebutting.
Since you can't, you continue to support the proof that God exists. God doesn't really thank you for this. He simply made things so that you can't. He has Himself to pat on the back for blocking you jokers.
Debunked by yourself: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19455088
And debunked by me: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19350390
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19357376
Also: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19355289
How do you know? You can’t explain the rebuttal that you are talking about. And you don’t have any rebuttal of your own.
How do I know what? How do you know yours is proof? We can keep asking stupid questions like that forever. If you have any questions about my rebuttal or your own, feel free to ask because I will answer any question.
How do you know there is any rebuttal to my own "stuff" in the things that I say? You wouldn't know a rebuttal if it jumped up and bit you in the eyeball.
Science says mine is proof. That's the whole thing that we are talking about, here. Scientific proof, or the rebuttal of it. Of course, nobody should be surprised that you haven't figured that out yet.
I have been asking you to show one rebuttal to the proof that God exists. So far you haven't shown a rebuttal at all. Everything that you have said has so many holes in it that Swiss cheese is a thousand more times more solid.
Nope science doesn't say yours is proof. Rebuttal here:
Debunked by yourself: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19455088
And debunked by me: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19350390
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19357376
Also: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19355289
Can't write it out, can you? Science proves God exists, and there has been nothing to rebut that fact.