Maybe this will help people disambiguate the competition.
I'll edit/update this table as time goes on.
-The marketplace refers to in-wallet
-and our gui wallet is much sexier than DRK's altho I'm not sure if I can put that as a feature
I am open to input and corrections and will update table accordingly.
thanks
Good list, A couple comments:
- Smooth launch is ambiguous. It's probably not a metric
- BTC blockchain should be BTC codebase. None of these are on the BTC blockchain. (XCP is an example of being on BTC blockchain)
- GUI wallet could be changed to HTML wallet if you want to lift up Shadow's "first to market" HTML wallet
- Not sure what low interest is? 2% annually?
- Technically all 3 are B2B ready.
Additions:
- Foundation (non-profit)= XMR & SDC (No), DRK (Yes)
- Centralized= XMR & SDC (No), DRK (Yes)*
*this is only because Evan is creating a historical habit of making decisions on his own.
(Ref#1: Adding more coins to the Darkcoin marketcap to purchase ShadowCash
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit)
(Ref#2: Rebranding to DASH
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rebranding-and-scalability.4254/)- Dev team size= XMR & DRK (Large), SDC (Small)
- Untraceable= XMR & SDC (DRK can be given the resources)
- Unlinkable= XMR & SDC (DRK can be given the resources)
- Blockchain Token= SDC (Yes), XMR & DRK (No)
- Lite Wallet= SDC (Yes), XMR & DRK (No)
