Topic: [SDC] ShadowCash | Welcome to the UMBRA - page 387. (Read 1289714 times)

What are you trying to achieve Pline? You know there are people here that are also involved in Dark as well right?

Giveaways happening here https://ocupy.net/hubs/ion/62-100-shadowcash-giveaway?start=12 & Here http://shadowtalk.org/topic/340/100-sdc-giveaway will be continued if successful send your friends family whatever over looking for people who have not got any SDC yet but want some, cheers

Also there is further evidence in the merger proposal that the merger did involve the technology aspect as well and not just to acquire the devs:


Also its interesting, the proposal indicates that the DRK team actually doesn't know for sure how large the Shadow team is:



source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit?pli=1

Why are you so rude? he brought up legitimate points get off his case.

Buddy, why are you so boring ? 

It sounds like an attempt by Duffield to save face after the leaked info threatened an embarrassment.  "Its not about the tech" he says because he doesn't want people to lose faith in his project, or go to Shadow for their tech.  He admits the devs are top notch, yet they don't have valuable tech?

I really don't like how some of the DRK fanboys and other coins try to bash the Shadow project.  Look at this post from illodin:


So its all a massive conspiracy from the Shadow Scam team to increase liquidity to sell their millions of coins??  LOL, these people are really pathetic, why not just unite around the idea of anonymity and privacy?  If DRK actually had a feasible solution rather than their inherently flawed master node scheme, I could get behind them, but give me a break.

The purpose of the proposal was to increase the number of people working on the DRK dev team, nothing about the tech.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9459644

It was confidential but Cryptoboh leaked it, then the DRK community was against it so Eduffield took it down.
Later a lot of monster devs joined the DRK team (https://www.darkcoin.io/about/team-contact/) , I believe no way they are gonna ask SDC for a merger again.

Few questions: 

I tried to get my friend to download ShadowGo for android.  Wondering if it comes automatic in lite or thin mode? Or you have to switch to thin mode?  Couldn't find the option.

Also, I am wondering, if you send coins from Shadow to a stealth address, does that mean you can't stake those coins that reside in stealth address?  Do you have to send them to a regular address before you can stake them?

Also is there any privacy advantage or disadvantage to using more than one stealth address for receiving shadow transactions?  Or for when sending from Shadow back to SDC?

I am an investor, not a technical analyst.
Don't care for day traders. Investors should look at the work/technology, not just the numbers.
A resistance level at an arbitrary number (perhaps in part set by whales). Could just as easily have been 80k+ (or less than 40k) IMO. Anyway… moving on…
Despite the REMARKABLE DEVELOPMENT of Shadow? For Real? C'mon man!
Plummet? Thats a powerful word for a tech analyst.
my analysis: hyperbolic & highly speculative. Disregarded.


The obvious increase in community activity points to soaring rather than plummeting.
I think we both agree that a positive review will blow away the "40k resistance"?

The Zeuner Review IS coming…

It's worth noting that ~65,000 coins represents 1% of total coins. Having a number of wallets on an exchange with similar amounts means that price can easily be manipulated by even just 1 or 2 of those traders. Imo price should be closer to $1 per coin with the type of tech Shadow represents. But clearly distribution is still being stifled by large active traders. Hence the crazy low ATH we've hit twice and the sideways trend the coin has seen for the majority of it's short life.

I'm not sure I've seen such a long accumulation phase with such a disruptive coin in all my years of trading crypto. I'll take this slow and steady cycle over crazy peaks and valleys any day. This project will be the prize of many collector's holdings soon enough.

Technical analysis doesn't matter much in a market as small as this.  Price here is moved too easily by one large buyer or one large seller.

Also nobody would be able to buy much at the price of 1K satoshi when it was there.  If they wanted to buy 100K SDC at that time, then probably it would make the price go up very significantly.  So don't worry, probably nobody accumulated millions of SDC at such a cheap price.  Also those that did accumulate at cheaper prices tend to sell off as the price goes up.  Notice the distribution on bittrex has become more evenly distributed since the recent price rise: https://beta.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-SDC

Only 2 accounts hold more than 60,000 SDC now.  It used to be more, and now only 7 or 8 accounts hold more than 50,000.  As price goes up it gets more evenly distributed.  Luckily price is so low now, its not too late for anyone to get a nice chunk of SDC.

You speak about investors but have no idea about technical analysis? This is what many investors and/or day traders  will base their buys/sells on.

40k is a double top right now with a very long period of accumulation in between. The double top marks a resistance level. We have been lucky so far as the price hasnt tanked yet. If we hit 40k again and do not break it (triple top), the price could very likely plummet to below this accumulation price.

40k is the SDC all-time high iirc.
How does this equate to "obvious resistance" (besides the fact it was obviously resisted at this price before)?

Presumably mentioning sub-1k buys wont encourage things much.

Not that Im worried. just perplexed.

This isn't about new investors. This is about the current community. I believe he was discussing the obvious resistance at 40k on the market.

You do what you want. You say what you want. Im not a censor here.

All Im saying is:

What is the point of you coming in here (after an absence) only to go on about how cheap you bought the coin? Who's interest does that serve? Do you think new investors will be impressed?

I didn't start fud...
also i was drinking last night.
I reread what i wrote i don't see any fud. In fact I like sdc and my friends all have sdc. I wouldn't fud it. Alright?
You don't want me to post on the thread so sure i wont post.

And I exercise the right to do exactly f*ing that right now Wheatclove!  

You sound very desperate. People can converse however they want.

For anyone interested, here is the original merger document for when Darkcoin and Evan Duffield tried to acquire ShadowCash: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit?pli=1

Here was the ShadowCash response: http://shadowtalk.org/topic/252/darkcoin-proposal-statement

I thought it was pretty interesting that a more established project like DRK would be so interested to buy off the ShadowCash project.  Do they feel threatened?  There obviously must be something of value here if they wanted a merger.  Then I wonder why in this video Evan Duffield the DRK developer didn't even acknowledge the value of zero knowldge coins, or trustless solutions like SDC (8:26 mark): http://youtu.be/lzu_02-lp7o?t=8m26s

Instead he only criticized zero knowledge, even after he had seen the potential of ShadowCash enough to offer a merger deal?  It just doesn't seem very honorable, and its slightly embarrassing for the DRK team.  I bet they are happy that it was never widely publicized.

One part of the merger details that I found kind of funny was part 2 on the proposal conditions:

Really weird that they thought this would work out.  What if the devs were not working as hard as Evan had hoped?  Its like the ShadowCash team would have become subserviant to Duffield, but don't worry Duffield will allow them the privilege to work on whatever they want, as long as they keep the same pace as now, lol.  Seems so amateurish and desperate by the DRK team.

Hey wow! I'm sure new investors would love nothing more than to read bragging about how cheaply you bought Shadow in the past.
Like who gives a sh*t?

Could we raise the level of conversation a tad?

Investors should rather consider the current price, namely 5 cents a coin.

For those that bought crazy cheap or mined a bunch you'll be happy to know that I and many others are backing your investment (albeit by proxy). My entry at 15k-20k was a bargain, as is the current price.