Also there is further evidence in the merger proposal that the merger did involve the technology aspect as well and not just to acquire the devs:
Also its interesting, the proposal indicates that the DRK team actually doesn't know for sure how large the Shadow team is:
source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit?pli=1
Quote
It seems both of our teams are going down similar paths and doing all of the work twice. The ShadowCash team has been hard at work creating a great user experience, stealth address technology, encrypted chat technology and much more. These are areas in which Darkcoin could benefit.
We’re hard at work creating an encrypted multi-path messaging system and instant
transactions. So the work we’re doing complements each other rather well.
We’re hard at work creating an encrypted multi-path messaging system and instant
transactions. So the work we’re doing complements each other rather well.
Also its interesting, the proposal indicates that the DRK team actually doesn't know for sure how large the Shadow team is:
Quote
The total value of Darkcoin would stand to gain a lot from such a partnership. This means that anyone that has a stake in ShadowCash (for example the developers, writers, PR people, etc) would instantly have a stake in Darkcoin and thus have an interest in helping out. We're combining communities together to become stronger. Imagine us all working together and forming a meaningful alliance. We’re under the impression the ShadowCash team is quite sizable and so is the Darkcoin team, combined we will have one of the largest most talented teams in all of crypto.
source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit?pli=1
What are you trying to achieve Pline? You know there are people here that are also involved in Dark as well right?
People said that Evan Duffield only wanted the developers and not for the tech when he tried to buy off the ShadowCash project. So I was showing that Duffield actually was interested in the tech as well according to the merger proposal, even though he doesn't acknowledge the value of zero knowledge solutions in his video.
Yeah I know some may be involved in DRK as well, so maybe they should realize the truth of what that project is all about. That they try to buy off competition, and then mislead investors by saying its not for the tech don't worry. Then the DRK fanboys come here and spread FUD like telling us how Shadow is not trustless when it is.
But I guess people aren't supposed to ask questions or point out facts, it might upset some people holding DRK? Your posts show that you are a DRK holder. Would you like to tell me to shut up then?
Merger with an emerging coin would be a very good way to gain motivated dev(s) to the team.
