With the small number of coins available and potential for trillions in market cap due to its technical advantages, I wouldn't want to sell a SDC for less than several BTC.
On the other hand, distribution is going to have to be much better for it to ever realize that potential. Somebody is going to have to bite the bullet. That leads to some interesting economic questions- let's say you hold all or nearly all of a coin- it's worthless if you are the only one using it, and worthless to you if you don't own any, so how would you distribute it to maximize your own wealth?
I don't know that this has ever been addressed.
On the other hand, distribution is going to have to be much better for it to ever realize that potential. Somebody is going to have to bite the bullet. That leads to some interesting economic questions- let's say you hold all or nearly all of a coin- it's worthless if you are the only one using it, and worthless to you if you don't own any, so how would you distribute it to maximize your own wealth?
I don't know that this has ever been addressed.
I agree on both points. Massive upside, but lack of even distribution could be an Achilles heel. Granted, this project has had no publicity, has flown under the radar while out preforming other dev teams & could have had many of it's most avid supporters gobbling up coins at nearly an identical price for months. This could be cause of the lopsidedness of address holdings. There is nothing wrong with showing support for a project you believe in. This coin also hasn't had a big pump & dump in the early days of coming on an exchange as most other coins have.
Hard to say.
Some data on distribution is recorded here:
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/270/rich-list-11-21-2014
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/288/rich-list-12-04-2014
