No. This is the conclusion I've arrived at after all the research I've done, considering various opinions, and my own careful monitoring of the many thousands of hands I've played during the past year on sealswithclubs. They most definitely are NOT running a legit poker site, in my opinion. Too bad there's nothing that can stop them from stealing as many bitcoins as they can suck out of people. Check out what somebody else said on Sealswithclubs' subReddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/SealsWithClubs/comments/1am4t2/i_dont_really_trust_the_swc_software_anymore/
With thousands of hands you should be able to do a statistical analysis and possibly demonstrate some evidence of bias, along with some measure of significance based on your sample size. Even then you would have some selection bias, since players who win or break even don't usually subject their hands to such analysis. So you should include a representative sample of all hands, not just your own.
With so many players playing, some people are going to have really bad luck, and those are going to go and post about it, while those with slightly bad to good luck won't. It may be very hard to win the lottery, but someone always does eventually. Similarly, it may be very unlikely to lose to a whole bunch of longshot draws, but it's going to happen to someone, due to the sheer number of hands played.
That's why you can't go by anecdotal evidence and opinions. You're always going to hear from the players who have experienced the worst luck.
Yep yep, a sign of growth... that we have more people experiencing this level of luck!
what do you mean? I just sent a small amount of BTC to SWC so I can play another buy-in. You mean this doesn't work? Or, are you just trollin'?
