I am also assuming that, even though some user could be allowed to come back and participate here again, does not necessarily mean others are forced to change their negative feedback on that user, right?
For example, if someone was banned around a year ago because they committed plagiarism and because of this thread that person is forgiven and allowed to post again, those who red-tagged them are supposed to feel compelled to remove such negative feedback or that would be independent of the decision of the administration and only come down to the personal point of view of each user?
For example, if someone was banned around a year ago because they committed plagiarism and because of this thread that person is forgiven and allowed to post again, those who red-tagged them are supposed to feel compelled to remove such negative feedback or that would be independent of the decision of the administration and only come down to the personal point of view of each user?
I don't think the tags would be removed after they have been pardoned for their offense. But I feel those tags should also be removed from the account (if there's any that comes with the banned account) like making it look like a brand new account. Well the way I see it, is like those who issued the tags should also be part of this project that's if the account that comes with a tag needs there presence.
I only feel for those new people who were banned for plagiarism on a mistake note, though the offence can't cause any more issues if the person indeed improves. Finally, even in campaigns, they get to check mostly your current status months and not your past months' status, and if the person could improve truly, less than 6 months is enough to prove and justify that. So, let the accounts speak for themselves.
