Pages:
Author

Topic: Sex behind bars. Conjugal Visits. Good or Bad? - page 5. (Read 4141 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
LIR Dev. www.letitride.io
.... As a straight white guy with an existing sex drive do I seriously have to explain why any form of restricting sex or masturbation is a seriously bad idea for men?

But if you raped, or robber or murdered maybe you don't deserve to have sex. I don't think they can stop you for jerking the jimmy though. How would they enforce such a rule?
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1023
Yeah, I think it should be allowed. Seems like rape issues would definitely be increased if they removed this.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
.... As a straight white guy with an existing sex drive do I seriously have to explain why any form of restricting sex or masturbation is a seriously bad idea for men?
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
I guess you have to look at the pros and cons of it. I'm sure the instance of rape are higher in prisons where they're not allowed conjigal rights, plus it will be easier to sneak contraband into the prison whilst they're left in a room together.
sr. member
Activity: 269
Merit: 250
Hell, here in Texas they banned and confiscated any and all pornography - even pictures from wives, girlfriends. For the states that allow conjugal visits, it seems to be a tactic to keep inmates on their best behavior as conjugal rights will be stripped if the inmate receives any write-ups, etc. I don't have a problem with it as long as those receiving them aren't rapists, child molesters, etc.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Never ending parties are what Im into.
This really breaks down to how you want to treat people that have done society wrong. Do you want to create monsters or do you want to bring these people back into the fold? Pedophiles and serial killers are the only people I would not give a 2nd chance if I ran the world.

Have to remember a good majority of inmates are in there due to the war on drugs. Also have people that should be medicated rather than thrown in jail to rot and fend for themselves. So coming back around to the question,I stick to the line I mentioned in my first post.
Being pedophiles and people that beat or manipulate the opposite sex. Now that said I am presuming we are looking at men for the question.

Its a rabbit hole because you start pulling on all kinds of factors that could put us on one side of the fence or another.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
LIR Dev. www.letitride.io
Depends on their crime in my opinion. If they are in jail for battery,domestic,diddling or anything against kids the answer should be "No"!


What if they are a drug dealer? Where does the line get drawn?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Never ending parties are what Im into.
Depends on their crime in my opinion. If they are in jail for battery,domestic,diddling or anything against kids the answer should be "No"!
hero member
Activity: 745
Merit: 500
I say let them fuck.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
LIR Dev. www.letitride.io
Wondering what the general consensus is regarding conjugal visits in prison. The way I see it, these criminals broke the law and it's been determined by a judge or jury that their freedom is to be taken away.

So why let criminals have sex in prison?

Do they let inmates on death row have them? If not. Why not?

What do you guys think?



Pages:
Jump to: