Topic: Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 2. (Read 5381 times)
This will be a very difficult decision for them to think of, in the first place, they have their road map where their project should be inclined into, second is the pressure from the people especially the investors and the bounty hunters. Their mindset could be like asking too many times when to be listed to an exchange, as a result, for the project to somehow prove their competency to the market, they rush and decides to list on an exchange even if it has a negative reputation, plus, many people contributes by dumping the price of the coin leading to another worthless token created.
The main reason towards poor market price of a project is not only caused by shit exchanges but also from the project itself. How can a particular project has about 10billion circulating supply and expect a miracle from her investors. The supply is always much, whereby the demand is few. That's the main issue facing altcoin irrespective of the exchange
I agree, the project itself plays an important role in gaining investor confidence. There are many projects that initially listed on large exchangers but because they look prospective and are supported by a large community, large exchangers glance and listings at no cost.
The main reason towards poor market price of a project is not only caused by shit exchanges but also from the project itself. How can a particular project has about 10billion circulating supply and expect a miracle from her investors. The supply is always much, whereby the demand is few. That's the main issue facing altcoin irrespective of the exchange
In my opinion, supply is no longer an issue because if we look at TRX or XRP, their supply is the most but investors are still hunting because of liquidity. Listing in a large exchanger has an psychological effect on investors because in my opinion it is related to liquidity and this will affect investor interest
The main reason towards poor market price of a project is not only caused by shit exchanges but also from the project itself. How can a particular project has about 10billion circulating supply and expect a miracle from her investors. The supply is always much, whereby the demand is few. That's the main issue facing altcoin irrespective of the exchange
Yes, you are right my friend. Shit exchanges are killing good projects, this is a fault of the project owner! Many projects listed on a normal exchange first, when the community asked about it, they reply big exchange coming on the board! But day over day, the project goes to end badly! Recently people arising their voice against P2PB2B, Vindax, Latoken exchanges, which is very positive! People should stop using those shot exchange, and if any project goes for shit exchange, we should boycott both of them instantly!
One wrong move from the team behind a project can ruin everything. In many discussions on this forum about why projects fail one
thing is common, it's the team that made wrong move with choosing managers, their marketing, and after all choosing an exchange.
I don't think that we can boycott them, we can unite all the people. There are old ones who don't care about that, they tried and
that didn't work, new ones don't believe in anything except how to make fast money.
Yes, you are right my friend. Shit exchanges are killing good projects, this is a fault of the project owner! Many projects listed on a normal exchange first, when the community asked about it, they reply big exchange coming on the board! But day over day, the project goes to end badly! Recently people arising their voice against P2PB2B, Vindax, Latoken exchanges, which is very positive! People should stop using those shot exchange, and if any project goes for shit exchange, we should boycott both of them instantly!
it cannot be denied that most projects are good and have quality products but ultimately end badly, especially for developers who register their projects in bad exchange. Well, there might be a number of reasons developers do that, but if so, surely a good project will not produce sweet fruit.
Many ICO companies do not know the correct person to choose as the perfect manager, exchange and Pro. If they pick the right person we were seeing the projects on the good exchanges.
Most of the people looking big exchanges and pick the incorrect person to list the tokens instead of going right place in website.
Most of the people looking big exchanges and pick the incorrect person to list the tokens instead of going right place in website.
All good projects are careful of exchange they list on, everyone knows nothing good can come of a shit exchange so it won't be surprising if a seemingly good project lists on a shit exchange. This means its not worthy of being called a good project. Sometimes it's more than just listing on an exchange.
Project who has not intention of firther development will list them into shit exchanges and dump all their tokens to get more juice from their business plan.Never interested on new projects anymore.We have already enough projects to survive for new century.
The big exchanges are greedy slobs. They only care about making money off project devs. I believe if a project is good and shows interest and potential demand, it won't matter where it lists, it will trade well with great volume on any exchange. CountingHouse (CHT) traded for several months on only etherdelta (or was it forkdelta?) and the price was steadily going up as well
All good projects are careful of exchange they list on, everyone knows nothing good can come of a shit exchange so it won't be surprising if a seemingly good project lists on a shit exchange. This means its not worthy of being called a good project. Sometimes it's more than just listing on an exchange.
Project who has not intention of firther development will list them into shit exchanges and dump all their tokens to get more juice from their business plan.Never interested on new projects anymore.We have already enough projects to survive for new century.
I don't think good projects choose some shitty exchanges, if a project chooses a shit exchanges well don't expect too much from it and I think some projects that choose good exchanges might scam the investors.
This is what I think as well, it is very easy to think that a good project is going to decide to be listed in a bad exchange and that is what it caused its ruin but the truth is that the project was not as good as you thought it was, good projects that actually have original ideas and that have a group of dedicated and motivated developers are going to eventually be listed in good exchanges without having to pay anything for the privilege, because the customers of those exchanges are going to ask the exchange to list that coin. 
All good projects are careful of exchange they list on, everyone knows nothing good can come of a shit exchange so it won't be surprising if a seemingly good project lists on a shit exchange. This means its not worthy of being called a good project. Sometimes it's more than just listing on an exchange.
Now this fraudulent project has harmed many people, be it other project developers, investors, even bounty hunters affected, we can see now how one projects that was very serious team to develop their project, but in the end the project could not run because of the lack of investors to fund the project, and the reason investors are afraid that if the project is also a scam / fraud, I think in the future it will be very difficult for us to get a project that will truly have potential and success in their token sale. 
But sometimes I see some good projects but they are listed on an exchange that has a bad reputation, maybe because the list fees are expensive so they are forced to register there. But if they have enough funds I think they will not want to register a bad exchanges.
Expensive listing fees are always a problem for projects that do not have enough funds, but that cannot be used as a reason to list
their tokens/coins on a bad exchanges
There are other ways can be taken by dev to be listed in a good exchange, one of which is through an Voting contest.
And if dev can manage its community well, I think this method (Voting) will be very effective.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
You are right, but my opinion is good project listed low volume exchange because of some time problem about team fund-raising issue, so they have no way to listed good exchange. 
in fact, many projects are good that the listing in the shit exchange because the price for a listing is very cheap and made investors become quieter because the project they follow already enrolled in exchange they usually feel happy even project a nice listings in 2 exchange project team usually they are more concerned future to the project development.
that's where the actual reputation of the project can be seen, if they mature, it won't take too long to calm investors and focus on the next plan, but what happens is that the developer is really panicking with the situation / indeed has planned to take an important part in selling most their own tokens on the exchange, indirectly clearly led to a bad stigma between developers and exchanges and ended with a negative reputation that continues to occur repeatedly. There are many reasons that make developers put their coins / tokens on shit exchange, for investors to be calm because they have entered the market even though it is shit or small exchange. It could be that the exchange itself included it without first asking the developer for permission.
Or it could be that developers are getting frustrated by market conditions but continue to be urged by investors to immediately put them in exchange.
Or it could be that developers are getting frustrated by market conditions but continue to be urged by investors to immediately put them in exchange.
You gave a valid reason for developers deciding to list on shit exchange, but that does not change the fact that listing on a shit exchange cause more harm than good. The project should be able to budget rightly and develop the project well enough to attract good investors.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
Situation are different as project idea and types. This bear market can't help all projects to funds rise. After listed exchange some project start fund rise. I bought a coin which project can manage any exchange after more than 2 year. That project still in developing but people already forget about this coin. 
Too much Exchange. But the volumes need to examine how much of them. Exchange's values change by volume. Bitcoin has dominated the market. The Exchange's trying to extract their tokens. After the first IEO, some exchanges suffered enormous loss of prestige.
Jump to: