A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
well, there are two sides of the story. since english is international and used in crypto worldwide it is obvious we should learn it. but what if one only starting? and there s no need to humiliate people for a lack of it 
Topic: Should bounty hunters show English proficiency certificate? (Read 1787 times)
September 29, 2018, 02:08:00 AM
I think that it is not necessary to prohibit to participate in the bounty because of the poor knowledge of the English language. The main thing is to convey the essence of the problem.
September 28, 2018, 03:45:05 PM
I believe that this should not be done as a prerequisite . Not everyone will be able to provide this certificate, if at all at least someone can . Knowledge of English ideally is not a decisive factor for good performance. Of course we all need to work on the quality of speech to make it even more useful.
September 23, 2018, 01:09:02 AM
I totally agree with that idea. Many bountyhunters use Google translate to post information which is of no use to any reader. This destroys the integrity of the bounty industry and makes it difficult for the people who are working hard to support the project they believe it. Instead of a certificate bounty managers should also make an effort to check the quality of the posts that are being submitted.
It could also be because of these factors that you have expressed, but unfortunately Bounty hunter is just freelance and it can be done by anyone.
With the expertise available, that is what can be done by bounty hunters, the certificate must be bought and they are also difficult to get it.
September 15, 2018, 09:09:05 PM
It is not necessary. many experts of English do not have certificates and they are also fluent in English. even many who might learn in itself so it does not need that kind of thing. Furthermore, it may be the manager also does not want to struggle to see it one by one.
There are two possibilities for this because I know that cryptocurrency covers the whole world by uniting languages, namely English.
1. It must be difficult to have a certificate because the bounty is only followed by anyone who wants to campaign, if such initial intentions are definitely discrimination.
2. It is also good to have a certificate because English is needed and KYC can also say it.
September 10, 2018, 07:18:15 AM
I totally agree with that idea. Many bountyhunters use Google translate to post information which is of no use to any reader. This destroys the integrity of the bounty industry and makes it difficult for the people who are working hard to support the project they believe it. Instead of a certificate bounty managers should also make an effort to check the quality of the posts that are being submitted.
September 10, 2018, 07:08:55 AM
Certificate is too much, but most of hunters should learn English better to fulfill all obligations and avoid making trash content for ICO promotion.
Learn language and increase your value !
Learn language and increase your value !
September 07, 2018, 04:17:38 AM
not like you need to have cert. bounty manager can determine bounty hunters English proficiency by conversation and email. But the most important is how big the impact bounty hunter can make to the market. marketing skills and social media management become more essential skill compare to language.
September 07, 2018, 03:55:12 AM
It is not necessary. many experts of English do not have certificates and they are also fluent in English. even many who might learn in itself so it does not need that kind of thing. Furthermore, it may be the manager also does not want to struggle to see it one by one.
September 07, 2018, 03:12:37 AM
I think it is not necessary. Doing bounty campaigns only needs your amount of followers in order to get advertise. What is the use of your english proficiency if you have a few followers. And despite, this forum is a english majority users.
September 06, 2018, 05:21:55 PM
The presence of the certificate is not important. A person can learn English by himself. Importantly, he could convey his thought to others. The Manager said it was probably emotional. Because he was pissed. I don't think he's really going to ask for a certificate.
September 06, 2018, 05:20:08 PM
I think it's not really necessary. It is important that it can be understood and discussed.
Yes this absolutely not necessary and I wonder what they are turning bounties into. If probably English isn't accepted in the campaign I think there are sections whereby Bounty Manager asked to contact them via telegram before one can write on the project. So even if the writers English isn't okay to the Bounty Manager I still think he have every right not to reward such hunters than asking for Certificate. If he is going to drop some stakes for that, it will be better, if not. No need. September 06, 2018, 05:19:43 PM
A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
That seems like both great and bad idea, great for the fact that you will definitely recruit better prepared people to complete the tasks, and bad because another requirement would be added to participate on a simple bounty campaign. September 06, 2018, 05:05:39 PM
I am not in favor of this idea. Firstly, managers should not reward people whose skills are at a very low level. It would enhance their progress in English or they will be excluded from payouts. Quite simple. Secondly, the certificate means nothing. In addition, it would probably cost something. This regulation would be very ineffective as people are not willing to give their personal information to random people on the Internet through the certificate. On the other hand, if they accept certificates without this kind of information, people will cheat to get to the certain level. It would not solve anything but many people would lose time (managers too) and money as well while the amount of job for managers will remain at the same level. It is much easier to cut these people off. They will have to put some effort and then they will be rewarded by participating in campaigns. Fair, isn't it?
September 06, 2018, 01:23:36 PM
It is a good policy for the campaigns that have the English-speaking audience as their target. If not - the statement sounds strange. ICO teams usually care about their audience, because they bring them more money no matter whether they speak English or not.
September 06, 2018, 01:21:36 PM
No and never, bounties are open to all and we have equal participation in doing bounties.
I think if you will apply for translation it may be a requirement.
Bounty is free for all and not only American are the target of the advertisements.
mostly English people are not welcome to participate in an ICO.
so why do we need that?
I think if you will apply for translation it may be a requirement.
Bounty is free for all and not only American are the target of the advertisements.
mostly English people are not welcome to participate in an ICO.
so why do we need that?
September 06, 2018, 01:17:09 PM
It's of no need to be showing English proficiency certificate, why should it be? If in case it should be, I think it's for only article writers
September 06, 2018, 01:13:46 PM
I think it's not really necessary. It is important that it can be understood and discussed.
September 06, 2018, 01:02:43 PM
The fact is English is a tough language to learn and use properly.
The bottom line is if you are a good writer, you can succeed wildly with crypto bounties.
I've looked down the list on spreadsheets listing a projects article bounty submissions. If you did that too, you would realize that most people are terrible writers.
That doesn't stop opportunists from submitting anything they can in a bid to obtain assets at all costs though. This wave of crappy submissions is the primary reason bounty managers get frustrated.
I've submitted articles that were routinely rated as average. After querying the bounty manager, only to discover my article was lumped in with all the others unfairly. I've had several papers upgraded from average to excellent.
The fact that so many people are not qualified to write well, opens up a massive door of opportunity for the ones that can.
The bottom line is if you are a good writer, you can succeed wildly with crypto bounties.
I've looked down the list on spreadsheets listing a projects article bounty submissions. If you did that too, you would realize that most people are terrible writers.
That doesn't stop opportunists from submitting anything they can in a bid to obtain assets at all costs though. This wave of crappy submissions is the primary reason bounty managers get frustrated.
I've submitted articles that were routinely rated as average. After querying the bounty manager, only to discover my article was lumped in with all the others unfairly. I've had several papers upgraded from average to excellent.
The fact that so many people are not qualified to write well, opens up a massive door of opportunity for the ones that can.
September 06, 2018, 12:45:28 PM
All these people are not native English speakers. So the mistakes can be happened from the hunters. In this case I think that hunter may have typed English in a manner that was very hard to understand. Just my idea.
Jump to: