Topic: Should bounty hunters show English proficiency certificate? - page 4. (Read 1768 times)
it all depends on each person if the person wants to try to improve the quality of their posts it will be better. besides, we can choose another language that can be understood. I think that is it too serious if we must having an English language proficiency certificate to join in it. and actually, while the language that used is still understandable I think it will be fine.
don't make things that are too important to become a huge discussion. such a thing is not advised in the bounty and thus just make things more difficult. When not proficient in the English language there are still local boards that receive and does not need to be forced to have to sign in in English. In addition to narrowing the space for the bounty hunter then this will also make the job of manager.
It may be good for the overall state of the bounties. I see tons of low quality shit postings along with bot like social media activity. We really need to get the scammers under control. Maybe limiting the bounty hunters to well spoken English entries would benefit us all.
I think English Proficiency Certificate is not necessary requirements for bounty hunters as long as they have lot of knowledge about crypto currency and can understand their English grammar.
A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
No. People need to learn and this gives them an opportunity to do so and gain some $$. The bounties should require higher skilled promotion if thats what they desire. At the small portions they are paying they will get this type of issue. Can't pay minimum wage and expect a professional.
actually I really agree with this. this is because many translators use the application in translation for bounty programs. so that if there is a certificate in professional writing the food will be monitored correctly
No, they shouldn't.
English proficiency is not always measure by certificate or certificate doesn't define English skill of someone. In fact, there are many people with formal study background and has certificate but not proficient in English, in opposite, many people are good in English but don't have a certificate. The most crucial thing is the capability and the skill, not on the certificate.
Yeah, If you want to communicate with your own language go to your local board, and if you want to learn english yoy should read this forum every day so that you will learn too. So I think it is not fair to those who are not really good in English but this forum is really for those who know how to communicate in english, that is why there is a local board. Right? English proficiency is not always measure by certificate or certificate doesn't define English skill of someone. In fact, there are many people with formal study background and has certificate but not proficient in English, in opposite, many people are good in English but don't have a certificate. The most crucial thing is the capability and the skill, not on the certificate.
A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
That would only limit the reach of the project that manager is handling. I am a bit surprise that he did not see that coming when he started as a bounty manager. It is a goven that not everyone is good at english.
Why participation in the bonus must require a good level of English. They advertise for ICO in their own language, their English is not necessarily good to be able to participate in the bounty, it's pretty funny
I don't like this rules. Because not every country in world use English. And not every Investor also know english...
If you have to meet the international English standards to join the bounty, it is a funny thing. I think it's unrealistic, similar to asking a bounty hunter to KYC when joining a bounty.
A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
communication is important in this forum, and especially in telegram which is actually the main channel to communicate to the community, you must be good enough to be understood by other people and also to understand what other people are saying. that's pretty normal if an individual will get mad due to bad english of other people since they cannot understand what he might saying in the group.
No, they shouldn't.
English proficiency is not always measure by certificate or certificate doesn't define English skill of someone. In fact, there are many people with formal study background and has certificate but not proficient in English, in opposite, many people are good in English but don't have a certificate. The most crucial thing is the capability and the skill, not on the certificate.
English proficiency is not always measure by certificate or certificate doesn't define English skill of someone. In fact, there are many people with formal study background and has certificate but not proficient in English, in opposite, many people are good in English but don't have a certificate. The most crucial thing is the capability and the skill, not on the certificate.
I do not say that I have perfect English and I sometimes really make mistakes, but I try to write correctly, I try to practice my knowledge wherever possible. Even with a certificate you will have to verify.
Not at all, showing your English proficient certificate is not necessary at all, in fact it isn't a criteria for you to be a bounty Hunter. All you need do is to explore whatever technicality you have in promoting a content.
For instance, if you're a blogger, you need to gain mastery of the various steps involved in promoting any content after carefully reading their whitepaper and you're done.
For instance, if you're a blogger, you need to gain mastery of the various steps involved in promoting any content after carefully reading their whitepaper and you're done.
I believe this is not necessary. Just read and understand English is sufficient, by itself every campaign has its bonuses clear hierarchy. Require higher bonuses greater, more bonus campaign is to create a community, everyone can participate and benefit from the project ICO
I'm not that good at English too, but I do believe that I can still communicate. I think proficiency in any language must only be required for those who want to participate in Translation campaign.
A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
This quite funny and it is bound to happen as most bounty hunters are not English native speakers. Nevertheless, the request of English proficiency certificate to participate in bounties appears unnecessary in my opinion as there are other simple checks bounty managers can introduce to choose fluent English writers.
This sounds really funny but there are some sense in it, I think people look at the credibility of someone before giving credits and spoken and written English in certain spheres in one of such, Bounty marketers are automatically marketing a product and most times one have to look at good one's grammar is as part of what could make him make good judgment before choosing a project
A bounty manager in one telegram group was mad at the bad English of some hunters and made a statement that his next bounties will require English proficiency certificate. What are your views.I think it will enhance posts quality .
I think it's some kind of nonsense. It is better to immediately check the profile, look at the messages that have already been made, and conclude: take this person in his bounty campaign, or not. Jump to: