Simple calculation:
1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT.
2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined.
3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner.
4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner.
Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4)
Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes....
1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT.
2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined.
3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner.
4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner.
Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4)
Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes....
Simple?
There is the difficult that changes every block, there is the luck in prop, pplns pools.
Traking for days means nothing. Sigt was a totally diferent thing 2 days ago.
First off Suprnova is pplns and not prop. Luck means nothing over extended period of time. The number of shares has a bigger impact.
While each block varies usually from 10-350 seconds; if you track for 6 hours that 63 blocks min (pretty accurate for an average yield).
Every person knows the block reward halved after phase 1; but how many remember the yield before and after it?
Just because reward halved doesnt mean you make 50% less.
Sigt was totally different 12-24 hours after it launched and is less so after phase 1.
completely wrong bigjee ...
local hash - pool hash - and especially nethash play a massive part in all your so called calculations ...
this is why your logic is completely skewed an inaccurate ...
you would be absolutely correct IF your local hashrate AND the pool hash AND the nethash did not change at all ... it does - every 30seconds ... at times - the nethash fluctuates from 1terahash to 3.7terahash and back in a matter of hours ... this is a heavy displacement in diff and a massive difference in mining ...
your 6hour transient time frame means nothing in such circumstances - and these circumstances are a highly regular occurrence in signatum ... in fact almost all coins ...
if you want a better way to get more accurate figures - then you need to get out of the time frame mentality - and actually get into the mathematics of the code ... not by some arbitrary way of guessing the figures ...
the moment i post this from when i started - the diff and hashrate all changed dramatically again ... from 1.4th to 1.6th ...
#crysx
, faster for me on my Asus/Gigabytes 1060 6gb 19.5mh vs 18.5(SP3 or 5) @ 70 pl, +150c, -500m
