Hashrate goes permanantly up an down?
If the Miner runs for eth the hashrate constant
Topic: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] - page 8. (Read 39469 times)
August 10, 2017, 11:57:33 PM
it that normal (see sreenshot)?
Hashrate goes permanantly up an down?
If the Miner runs for eth the hashrate constant
Hashrate goes permanantly up an down?
If the Miner runs for eth the hashrate constant
August 10, 2017, 11:09:41 PM
More objective testing, GTX 1060 6GB, intensity set to 18, all defaults except fan speed set to 67% & Memory Clock -202.
I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx.
https://i.imgur.com/Wq2WlaZ.jpg
I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx.
https://i.imgur.com/Wq2WlaZ.jpg
From a screenshot winner still on SP5, right? Can you compare with SP3?
Thanks
August 10, 2017, 10:29:02 PM
I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/
The best performance i am getting with the New ccminer skunk-krnlx Fork With Faster SkunkHash Performance is giving me with gtx 1060 +140 core +0 memory +100% tdp 19mh each
The proof
Just the problem is mining at 95mh whattomine say i should get 4.70 hour instead i get 3.8 coin hour
August 10, 2017, 09:45:34 PM
More objective testing, GTX 1060 6GB, intensity set to 18, all defaults except fan speed set to 67% & Memory Clock -202.
I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx.
I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx.
August 10, 2017, 09:28:14 PM
ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z
and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible)
and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible)
I just say: i love you!
24 MH/s for 33 MH/s in my 1080. 65~66 MH/s in total (2x 1080).
The link shared by Epsylon is working for me under Windows 10 as well & is faster than the other ccminer.
Went from 36 to 48 so far on my 1080 Ti in my home office PC.
** Update : Increased TDP on the card and up to 51 now.
August 10, 2017, 08:25:33 PM
hi. i am very new with NVDIA. can someone pls help me with this algo? i cant make it work with my gtx 1080 ti. Thank you
https://image.prntscr.com/image/5GnfGlYqQICDpmnIz1mEVA.jpg
https://image.prntscr.com/image/5GnfGlYqQICDpmnIz1mEVA.jpg
August 10, 2017, 07:54:19 PM
What do u get without any changes to clocks and intensity set to -i 18?
I can reach to 20 MH/s but computer is not responsive at 24/25.
I can reach to 20 MH/s but computer is not responsive at 24/25.
August 10, 2017, 07:02:01 PM
Performance with Asus gtx 1070 +180 core -500 memory +85% tdp i 25 = 29.51mh
I am far away of the 35mh ...but the guy who said he had 35mh did not published his settings...
I am far away of the 35mh ...but the guy who said he had 35mh did not published his settings...
August 10, 2017, 06:59:44 PM
With skunk-krnlx, I have 20.3 mhs on my 1060 6gb at 75% power limit, +137 core - 400mem 
best result ever for me
32 mhs on my 1070 at 75% power limit too
MarcuDe spoke about a version of the miner wich is 40mhs on 1080.. That's insane hashrate !
best result ever for me
32 mhs on my 1070 at 75% power limit too
MarcuDe spoke about a version of the miner wich is 40mhs on 1080.. That's insane hashrate !
August 10, 2017, 06:47:08 PM
I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/
The best performance i am getting with the New ccminer skunk-krnlx Fork With Faster SkunkHash Performance is giving me with gtx 1060 +140 core +0 memory +100% tdp 19mh each
The proof
Just the problem is mining at 95mh whattomine say i should get 4.70 hour instead i get 3.8 coin hour
August 10, 2017, 06:35:40 PM
I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/
EDIT: Actually nevermind, the hash stabilizes to near identical across all miners for me which is around 17.11 to 17.33 MH/s, but the temperature difference appears to be real down to 68C versus 70-72C on others, ambient is a stable 25C don't think that's a factor. A bit odd that at same settings I get different temps on different miners.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/
EDIT: Actually nevermind, the hash stabilizes to near identical across all miners for me which is around 17.11 to 17.33 MH/s, but the temperature difference appears to be real down to 68C versus 70-72C on others, ambient is a stable 25C don't think that's a factor. A bit odd that at same settings I get different temps on different miners.
August 10, 2017, 06:11:43 PM
I get near identical 17MH/s with -i 18 on a GTX 1060 6GB with this when compared to spmod5, however check your power usage this miner is very erratic (it goes up and down quite a bit) while spmod is stable. Anyone else noticed anything like this?
Ya my power usage is all over the place.
August 10, 2017, 05:47:39 PM
I get near identical 17MH/s with -i 18 on a GTX 1060 6GB with this when compared to spmod5, however check your power usage this miner is very erratic (it goes up and down quite a bit) while spmod is stable. Anyone else noticed anything like this?
August 10, 2017, 04:18:39 PM
I just compiled on Windows, latest version
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
Man, you're the KING !
Would love to test it on my win10 install
EDIT : What's the best mining pool between suprnova, sigt.POOL.MN, and yiimp sigt ?
I wonder that also.
All pools are really bad, that i am aware of. Calculations sux, no monitoring, no estimated earning and such.
August 10, 2017, 01:51:10 PM
I just compiled on Windows, latest version
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
Man, you're the KING !
Would love to test it on my win10 install
EDIT : What's the best mining pool between suprnova, sigt.POOL.MN, and yiimp sigt ?
August 10, 2017, 01:33:27 PM
It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
not sure of retarded, or just cant do the basic math though.....
Retarded to me??? Lmao you talk without use the brain really...
I always help ppl without offending
August 10, 2017, 01:28:02 PM
It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
not sure of retarded, or just cant do the basic math though.....
August 10, 2017, 01:15:33 PM
Best skunk miner EVER !
Even compairing with Sp mod #5
Even compairing with Sp mod #5
August 10, 2017, 12:47:03 PM
It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
August 10, 2017, 12:45:10 PM
what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25?
Set intensity to 25.
68~69 MH/s now.
yeah but i get 27.7 MH versus 28.5 on sp mod 5
tried our miner amph? ...
#crysx
Jump to: