Topic: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] - page 9. (Read 39465 times)
August 10, 2017, 12:43:12 PM
I get best results with 32Bit and 7.5Cuda for my 1070s
August 10, 2017, 12:23:37 PM
My miner is showing great results but the pool side hash rate dropped.
gonna let it run a little bit.
gonna let it run a little bit.
August 10, 2017, 12:18:32 PM
@krnlx
thank you for sharing with us.
is there a chance to reduce CPU load for ccminer, like CWI claims do have done? I can't confirm if it's true, as I don't have ther binary to test.
thank you for sharing with us.
is there a chance to reduce CPU load for ccminer, like CWI claims do have done? I can't confirm if it's true, as I don't have ther binary to test.
August 10, 2017, 12:10:07 PM
I just compiled on Windows, latest version
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
August 10, 2017, 11:41:19 AM
Just tried the ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0, but always reboot my 1080Ti rigs, i tried 1 rig with spmod3 and 2 with this miner and both of ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0 reboot after 3 hours approximately, and the one with spmod3 still working fine, then i just swapped the miners on the rigs and the one with ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0 just reboot again, and the ones with spmod3 worked fine, any suggestions?
August 10, 2017, 11:37:12 AM
August 10, 2017, 11:13:08 AM
what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25?
Set intensity to 25.
68~69 MH/s now.
yeah but i get 27.7 MH versus 28.5 on sp mod 5
August 10, 2017, 11:07:40 AM
who want to download, compiled from the latest git:
ccminer_krnlx170810.7z
3 exe
x86 cuda 8.0 & 7.5
x64 cuda 8.0
x64 cuda 7.5 doesn't compile, errors
all are upx --lzma compressed
thanks to all developers making this available.
ccminer_krnlx170810.7z
3 exe
x86 cuda 8.0 & 7.5
x64 cuda 8.0
x64 cuda 7.5 doesn't compile, errors
all are upx --lzma compressed
thanks to all developers making this available.
Wow! I received 5~6 MH/s increase when compared to ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80. \o
Thank you very much!
Which of the 3 files did you use and what gpu?
August 10, 2017, 11:05:13 AM
Using the last build (x86) I have +1MH on my Gigabyte 1070 cards.
However, using the same build I have -1MH on my MSI 1070 Gaming X cards.
Still using old build for the gaming X cards.
Thank you for this miner software
Anybody here is using CWI to make the comparison?
However, using the same build I have -1MH on my MSI 1070 Gaming X cards.
Still using old build for the gaming X cards.
Thank you for this miner software
Anybody here is using CWI to make the comparison?
August 10, 2017, 10:28:06 AM
Do you notice an improved performance using CUDA 7.5 over of 8?
I got +1MH using the last version of the code from the GIT + CUDA 8.
x86 and x64 seems to be the same performance wise.
I got +1MH using the last version of the code from the GIT + CUDA 8.
x86 and x64 seems to be the same performance wise.
x86 reboots my 1080/Ti rig (but all x86 caused reboot yet), the 1070 rig runs fine and +1MH faster x86 vs x64
x64 cuda 8.0 "faster" then 7.5 on 1080/Ti
I'm talking about +1MH, same what you noticed
YMMV
August 10, 2017, 10:08:02 AM
Do you notice an improved performance using CUDA 7.5 over of 8?
I got +1MH using the last version of the code from the GIT + CUDA 8.
x86 and x64 seems to be the same performance wise.
I got +1MH using the last version of the code from the GIT + CUDA 8.
x86 and x64 seems to be the same performance wise.
August 10, 2017, 09:06:38 AM
cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github
equihash excluded as it caused build errors
I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring
both maxwell and pascal work
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8
52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp
equihash excluded as it caused build errors
I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring
both maxwell and pascal work
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8
52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp
@rednoW
would you mind to explain how to exclude the part that is causing the errors from the build process, I'd like to test it myself?
I just doing this for 2 days and could need some assistance.
Well, I'm not sure I make it in an easiest way )) I deleted equihash branch from project tree and commented out all equihash function calls in ccminer.cpp and util.cpp.
Guess that it was not necessary, try to remove compute_62 from nvidia compiler options, it seems to hardcoded for equihash and not supported by cuda 7.5 compiler))
@rednoW
thanks mate,
you were right, removing the unsupported arch from the cuda build options for equihash did the trick.
August 10, 2017, 09:03:07 AM
Guys, can anyone please post best version of this krnlx miner? Compiled version.
I heard there are differencies between x64 and x32 and that x32 is faster? can someone reliable and trusted post x32? PLEASE !!
This version posted on this page, is that trusted? :/
I am having troubles with compiling myself
I heard there are differencies between x64 and x32 and that x32 is faster? can someone reliable and trusted post x32? PLEASE !!
This version posted on this page, is that trusted? :/
I am having troubles with compiling myself
August 10, 2017, 08:08:38 AM
Code updated. Up to 52.5 mh on stock 1080ti
you are awesome sir !
August 10, 2017, 07:39:28 AM
Hello !
I m trying change stratum difficulty d=0.1 at suprnova but it dosnt work.
ccminer: unsupported non-option argument 'd=0.1'
Is it possible to change starting difficulty?
I m trying change stratum difficulty d=0.1 at suprnova but it dosnt work.
ccminer: unsupported non-option argument 'd=0.1'
Is it possible to change starting difficulty?
August 10, 2017, 07:33:05 AM
no need to mem overclock, try to reduce mem clock as much as possible
Use -i 26 for 1080ti
You right, no need to overclock mem. Was checking with\without overclock. Result is same.
Code:
[2017-08-10 14:49:08] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 53.18 MH/s
Btw this is -i 25. 26 for me is toooo luggy.
August 10, 2017, 07:31:24 AM
Compiled ccminer-skunk_krnlx-rednoW-build is marginally faster than SP-mod #3 and #5. Great job, thank you!
August 10, 2017, 06:22:08 AM
Works great
44mhs @ 1080 ti
Afterburner settings:
- Core Voltage: 0
- Power Limit: 75%
- Temp. Limit: 75 c
- Core clock: +100MHz
- Memory Clock: +600MHz.
Any suggestions to get even better result?
44mhs @ 1080 ti
Afterburner settings:
- Core Voltage: 0
- Power Limit: 75%
- Temp. Limit: 75 c
- Core clock: +100MHz
- Memory Clock: +600MHz.
Any suggestions to get even better result?
no need to mem overclock, try to reduce mem clock as much as possible
Use -i 26 for 1080ti
August 10, 2017, 06:20:44 AM
cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github
equihash excluded as it caused build errors
I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring
both maxwell and pascal work
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8
52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp
equihash excluded as it caused build errors
I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring
both maxwell and pascal work
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8
52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp
@rednoW
would you mind to explain how to exclude the part that is causing the errors from the build process, I'd like to test it myself?
I just doing this for 2 days and could need some assistance.
Well, I'm not sure I make it in an easiest way )) I deleted equihash branch from project tree and commented out all equihash function calls in ccminer.cpp and util.cpp.
Guess that it was not necessary, try to remove compute_62 from nvidia compiler options, it seems to hardcoded for equihash and not supported by cuda 7.5 compiler))
August 10, 2017, 06:10:04 AM
cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github
equihash excluded as it caused build errors
I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring
both maxwell and pascal work
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8
52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp
equihash excluded as it caused build errors
I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring
both maxwell and pascal work
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8
52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp
@rednoW
would you mind to explain how to exclude the part that is causing the errors from the build process, I'd like to test it myself?
I just doing this for 2 days and could need some assistance.
Jump to: