This post simply reads conversational, and I was unable to take away anything meaningful from the post.
As you've already said, both of your submissions have been deleted and you'll have to be more careful with the threads you choose to post in.
Another submission that has been deleted. This is a good reinforcement for my reasoning behind letting the submissions marinate for a few days (at least). It allows the moderators to weed out my bad submissions for me.
These posts were short, but sweet and honestly pretty boring to read. I'm not trying to come down on you too hard, but it looks like there was absolutely no thought put into those posts and they were made simply to add to your post count or add to the noise. I can't merit these.
I have given you a
Merit for your first submission, simply because it has provoked some discussion that I found interesting to read. I can't quite put my finger on it, but I believe there has been many lists such as this created and even submitted to me in the past, but I do not regularly give them merit. I expect you to maintain that list, keep it up to date and provide more information so that it is more extensive. I would like to use yours as a reference in the future, don't let me down! The second submission is just talking about Mike Hearn, conversationally, which is not something I plan to merit. I even gave you another
Merit for your "Can someone have my private key?" post, because the graphic was interesting and it was certainly an informative post. It was information I had already heard before, but it certainly was a good refresher. Your post about diamonds is interesting, but just a little about outside of what I am interested in meriting. You've received two merit though, so that's win in my book.
