Topic: Solution to poverty - Socialism or Capitalism? - page 20. (Read 30791 times)

Another very good point. Although the ability for you to do what you do best somewhat depends on where you live as there are not always jobs available in the industry of what you do best in the area that you live.

Why is it then, since tractors where invented, and other automation of fields that destroyed agriculture jobs, people always found jobs ? I want your reason.

Capitalism will evnetually collapse. Automatization is very real and more and more jobs are going to be pushed out of market, leaving thousands and millions of people unemployed for LIFE. Have fun dealing with that.

None of the above. Resource Based Economy or DEATH.

Bitcoin in the meanwhile.

There can't be true and healthy tribalism anymore within a world of collectivism (capitalism/socialism/feudalism/nationalism/globalism).

We need everyone to live a good life from birth, anything that isnt this creates war.

None of ways could completely remove poverty from any countries over a little period of time,it's the matter of literacy and political stability of the country.

Yeah, I have heard France is one of the worst countries to live in when it comes to taxes.

I suspect being taxed to death is a strong incentive for people to get into cryptos.

Tribalism in African community can not reach economic of scale because they close down the gate to outsiders. This is also true in Hindu and Muslim societies and the reason for backwardness.

European countries and US letting "close culture" in not only create a problem for the local community in the long term. Refusal to assimilate will also create tension to a diverse country.

Not just efficiencies of scale, when trade happens freely, everybody/country does what they do best. This results in maximum output.

There are still a very small number of self sufficient communities in Africa. The problem with these kinds of communities is that their standard of living is much lower then even the poorest parts of the world. I think the reason for this is because when trade between countries and communities is done it is possible to realize efficiencies that are not possible in small groups when only one or two people is doing a certain task.

Finland and other Scandinavian countries have so called "capitalist socialism", i.e. a market economy and private entrepreneurship combined with high taxes and welfare. True socialism is completely different and assumes planned economy with state-owned enterprises.

I would completely agree that Scandinavian "capitalist socialism" ("welfare state") is the worst system ever existed! But a version of socialism with planned economy is completely different and can be suitable for some people who simply will never fit into market system.

You are not the worst, I live in France.
Here are the numbers:

As an entrepreneur, I wanted to wire to myself a 800€ salary.

For a 800€ salary my company had to pay 1458€. We can't opt out government services. (retirement savings I will never get, and public health care services)
The quality of the public health service are so bad, that I need to insure myself with private insurance company. (that can go from 50 to 150€ per month depending on the quality and your health record)

Then, consumption taxes are around 15% in average. Income taxes, 15% in average.
And on top of that, my company pays around 20% of corporate taxes. (can go higher if I earn more)

So, all in all, let's calculate what the government get from my labor (don't talk me about the "advantages" of public health care I will never benefit, or at the cost of my sanity dealing with the public services)

1458 - 800  = 658  //1458 is the cost of my company for all the "government services" going with my salary, can't unsubscribe
658 - (20% * 1458) = 366    //This is the money I don't have to pay as corporate taxes, because it decrease my benefit
366 + (15% * 800)  = 486   //My income taxes
486 + (15% * 800) = 606    //Consumption taxe

So, on 1458 I made with my own labor, I am paying a total of 606 end to end to government.
And you know what ? I have nothing to complain about.
If I improve my total personal income and salary, I raise the income taxes, and corporate taxes.
Then I can get some other taxes if I get rich enough on top of that.
Gerard Depardieu, one of our most famous actor paid a total of 80%, and had expatriated from france because of it.

What is making me crazy, is that with those 606 I am giving to the government, I make it stronger, more the time pass, the more they worsen my condition.
Now I have 3 solutions :
-Shut my mouth and work harder to pay harder, and make them stronger,
-Decrease my standard, and profit from the system, (if I don't give myself a salary, I can get money from government that is more than the 800€ I paid myself)
-Looking for alternatives, (Expatriating in another country is one option I am considering now, given most of my work can be remotely done, I don't care about borders)

In any case I will not lower my standard, nor work for my own destruction.

Catalonia had the Pujol mafia steling on their shit for years, while they talked about morals, ethics, hard work cried about Spain stealing on their resources. Just lol.

I live in Finland, which is one of the most socialistic countries in the world, along with other scandinavian countries. I will try to explain the faults of socialism, based on my personal experience. I will try to present facts and actual figures, so we can think objectively, instead of just "believing" or "feeling" that socialism must be great. These figures are based on Finland, but the system is roughly same in any socialist country.

Lets begin by looking at the monthly wages (in EUR). These are just ballpark figures, but pretty accurate:

• 1000: A unemployed person who lives on social security.
• 2000: A person who works on a lower end job.
• 3000: A person who works on a higher end job at the junior level.
• 4000: A person who works on a higher end job at the senior level.
• 5000: A person who works at the first manager level.

Here we see the first hallmark of socialism. The manager only makes slightly more than a regular employee, even though his responsibilities are far greater.

Now, the employer pays about 1.3 times this amount (includes government run retirement fund). So for a wage of 2000, the employer pays about 2600. This, combined with very strong labor unions, is an incentive for employers not to hire people easily.

Many social security benefits work so that you immediately lose them if you do ANY work. So the person getting 1000 from social security can't do some small part time work to get another 500. This is a strong incentive to make people passive.

Now of course the employee does not get this full amount. Now we get to the great evil of socialism, which is progressive income tax. Lets look at the person who starts at 3000, and evolves through his career to 4000 and eventually to 5000.

• With the wage of 3000, after income tax, he gets about 2100.
• With the wage of 4000, after income tax, he gets about 2650.
• With the wage of 5000, after income tax, he gets about 3100.

On paper his wage went from 3000 to 5000 (increase of 2k), but the money he actually gets after taxes increased only by 1k. Note the employer still pays 1.3 times, so for a wage of 5k he pays 6500 (now more than twice what the employee actually gets after taxes).

So, after years (and decades) of working hard and advancing your career, while going from 3k to 5k might sound ok, the reality is you get only slightly more money. This is not a strong enough incentive to work hard and advance in your career.

Now after all this, our employee finally gets the money on his bank account, and wants to spend it on some goods and services. Guess what? There are huge taxes on everything. First of all, most goods and services have a Value Added Tax of 24%. Additionally, many products have their own separate tax. Lets take gasoline for an example. Over half of the price you pay for gasoline is tax, so you pay more for the tax than for the product itself.

So, when most of your money goes to paying taxes, what little is left will go to essential things like food, paying rent, and so on. Even after decades of working hard, many people still have to worry about having these basic needs met. There is very little money "left over" for savings and investment. This means that most people do not get to participate in "capital gains", such as the stock market (or bitcoin). This is a mechanism which ensures that the poor stay poor and building up your wealth over the years is extremely difficult.

After paying all these taxes, the next logical question becomes, what is the quality of the services the government provides? Lets take healthcare for example. We have a tax-funded public healthcare system and a private one. Each person is free to use either one. If you have a condition which does not require immediate attention, but bothers your life, you have to wait up to 3 months to see the public doctor from making an appointment. This forces many people to use the private healthcare system after all. So we are paying for a healthcare system through taxes, that we can't use in many cases, and end up "paying twice".

Socialism is marketed with words like "fairness" and "justice" and "helping the poor". I suspect the true intention is to make sure the poor stay poor, and middle class people do not rise to the upper class. Socialism does not build up society and economy, but keeps it in a stranglehold.

While capitalism will benefit some more than others in the short run, everyone is better off in the long run. When society and economy is built up, the living standards of everyone increase. Of the two systems, capitalism is the only one I would associate with words like "fairness" or "justice".

TD;DR: Socialism is evil and hurts the average working person the most.

None of the above are the solution.

Historically, before (and beyond) the state, there was self-sufficiency (no trade). But self-sufficiency is only possible within a nuclear community. Patriarchy (organized violence, state and church) destroyed those communities 10'000 years ago.

The best book I know is in German. Gerhard Bott: Die Erfindung der Götter.
Summary in english:

http://gerhardbott.de/das-buch/summary-in-english.html

So you are socialist without knowing it. (Well statist is better word)
Because the libertarian think it is not the government that will answer to that question, but individuals themselves if you let them trade.

In my own view i will say neither systems are the answer to poverty alleviation its just a matter of the Government been open minded regardless of class or race.

The difficult part is actually to keep some people in poverty despite the incredible abundance and productivity you have mentioned. 

Many people feel this is necessary because they live in the past and in deep mental illness, believing that other people suffering is just the way it should be.  Some people even think that others suffering makes them powerful.   

The main tools to keep poverty around are nations, authorities, borders, prisons, and fiat currencies.