Pages:
Author

Topic: Speculation Rule: buy when others are irrationally pessimistic or too cautious - page 14. (Read 36099 times)

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Lots of people dont know this yet, but I think that ETC will rise a lot this year. And by the way you were right about ltc. Pump seems to continue, but i still think that Litecoin wont be able to stay at a nice high level. I think that this is a temp. movement because of SegWit. But what after Bitcoin(what will take a while) gets SegWit? Litecoin is screwed right?

Bitcoin will never get SegWit. <--- reading the linked thread, will provide insights into my perspective of the future of our world

Litecoin will be volatile. After the activation of SegWit, the long road to actual implementation of LN. Above $50, it might drop back to $30 or something like that. Note I haven't studied the chart and tried to predict the longer-term price action so those are just rough guesses from a helicopter view analysis. But overall notwithstanding high volatility, it will outperform Bitcoin until it reaches full valuation.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
This is bouncing up and down, but slowly moving upwards. It just exceeded 59% for the first time:

http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

Nearly 60%:

345/576 (59.90%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

60% threshold breached!

348/576 (60.42%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

It's happening!

355/576 (61.63%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

392/576 (68.06%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

I guess once we break above resistance at $9.50, then we rocket up again. Two attempts already. The 3rd should succeed.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Its time for ETC now guys.



Thank me later.

I've got a position in ETC, but I've been really debating on whether it has a chance against ETH. Perhaps I'll continue to hold and see what happens after the fund opened. Maybe it will get  a nice big pump and I can trade back into ETH if I think it's still the long term winner.

We dont know who the winner is yet. Ethereum Classic hadnt any serious inevestor like Ethereum backing it. Now its the FIRST altcoin fund ever backing it, grewscale investments the same who are backing bitcoin. This means more capital flowing into Ethereum Classic, what pushes this crypto to higher levels. We will see a significant rise. Also Ethereum Classic only has a max of 210 000 000 tokens while Ethereum has 900 000 000. The current ETH price :10 is the real price. ETC will make some nice movements in the upcoming weeks. ETC fund will start this saturday. Lets ride this beast guys.

Is ETC committed to remain PoW?

Thanks for the point about the future money supply. That would help explain the ratio in price.

Lots of people dont know this yet, but I think that ETC will rise a lot this year. And by the way you were right about ltc. Pump seems to continue, but i still think that Litecoin wont be able to stay at a nice high level. I think that this is a temp. movement because of SegWit. But what after Bitcoin(what will take a while) gets SegWit? Litecoin is screwed right?
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Its time for ETC now guys.



Thank me later.

I've got a position in ETC, but I've been really debating on whether it has a chance against ETH. Perhaps I'll continue to hold and see what happens after the fund opened. Maybe it will get  a nice big pump and I can trade back into ETH if I think it's still the long term winner.

We dont know who the winner is yet. Ethereum Classic hadnt any serious inevestor like Ethereum backing it. Now its the FIRST altcoin fund ever backing it, grewscale investments the same who are backing bitcoin. This means more capital flowing into Ethereum Classic, what pushes this crypto to higher levels. We will see a significant rise. Also Ethereum Classic only has a max of 210 000 000 tokens while Ethereum has 900 000 000. The current ETH price :10 is the real price. ETC will make some nice movements in the upcoming weeks. ETC fund will start this saturday. Lets ride this beast guys.

Is ETC committed to remain PoW?

Thanks for the point about the future money supply. That would help explain the ratio in price.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Its time for ETC now guys.



Thank me later.

I've got a position in ETC, but I've been really debating on whether it has a chance against ETH. Perhaps I'll continue to hold and see what happens after the fund opened. Maybe it will get  a nice big pump and I can trade back into ETH if I think it's still the long term winner.

We dont know who the winner is yet. Ethereum Classic hadnt any serious inevestor like Ethereum backing it. Now its the FIRST altcoin fund ever backing it, grewscale investments the same who are backing bitcoin. This means more capital flowing into Ethereum Classic, what pushes this crypto to higher levels. We will see a significant rise. Also Ethereum Classic only has a max of 210 000 000 tokens while Ethereum has 900 000 000. The current ETH price :10 is the real price. ETC will make some nice movements in the upcoming weeks. ETC fund will start this saturday. Lets ride this beast guys.
sr. member
Activity: 399
Merit: 250
Its time for ETC now guys.



Thank me later.

I've got a position in ETC, but I've been really debating on whether it has a chance against ETH. Perhaps I'll continue to hold and see what happens after the fund opened. Maybe it will get  a nice big pump and I can trade back into ETH if I think it's still the long term winner.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Its time for ETC now guys.



Thank me later.
sr. member
Activity: 399
Merit: 250
Rising fast... 9% to go!

380/576 (65.97%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

I am looking forward to what the market does when this gets activated. Should be fun  Grin
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 102
dude thanks for elaborating all this. I researched a lot about those topics too for years now, but your summary is pretty plausible.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 506
You only registered in 2016. It is quite easy to make money while bull trend lasts.

Check my signature. I (@AnonyMint) registered in March of 2013.

If you abided by your own advice during bear market, that is in 2013-15, you would go bankrupt. I should know, I did go bankrupt at that time.

I called correctly the decline from $600 to $150. Go check my history. I was also quite upset with my friend @rpietila at $700 for telling people to buy moar. I was flashing red alert signs when BTC crossed $1000. I did make one mistake expecting BTC to make another dive below $100 and so I missed the rise from $150 back to $300. Then I got back on board.

Okay, thank you for explanation and clearing that up. I am also upset that Rpietila somewhere along the way stopped being investor and became what could by only described as cheerleader, if not cult leader.

Good to see you back.

Subbed.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Well to be fair it seems this is more a criticism of banking in general, not Ripple. I'm not aware of Ripple claiming they'd reform banking practices. From my understanding they're simply designing a system that can allow banks to operate more efficiently.

How is not paying an interest on deposits and not having any central bank or self-reported regulation on reserves represent what banking ever was or is?

If banks will only use Ripple as a clearing mechanism between themselves then what great value does Ripple have?

Frankly I don't understand what the widespread use case is?

Banks have the problem of trusting solvency. I don't see how trusted gateways resolve anything. All Ripple does is record that a promise was made. It doesn't do anything to insure those promises are valid or even fungible. Banks can't trust the USD.banknamehere tokens of each of 100 other banks. That is why they use a central bank backed currency.

I don't see how Ripple improves on the current situation at all.

Ripple reminds me of dot.com bubble with all the build it and they will come nonsense.

Ripple has a coordination problem which even the Fed can't solve. This is why Bitcoin rules and Ripple is dogshit.

Well, that was my point earlier. I don't see banks becoming non-existent "soon". Are you talking 5, 10 or 20 years when you say that?

I expect that in 5 - 10 years from now the world financial and monetary system will be quite different.

I expect Ripple to collapse as the sovereign debt crisis goes into defaults probably next year.

Can you elaborate on this, or point to where you have already elaborated on this?

What do you recommend people invest in outside of cryptocurrency right now?  Seems like you're stuck with real estate, equities or bonds at the moment.  I feel like there's far too much fiat chasing far too few correctly-priced investments.  What's your take?

As for the timing on sovereign debt collapse, I defer to Martin Armstrong. He has a blog.

He thesis is the Eurozone will economically collapse first. This has been and will continue to drive the USD higher as capital seeks a safe haven from the economic (and political) collapse of the EU. So the go to investment since 2012 has been the USA stock market. He has also recommended AAA corporate bonds, since the crisis is in sovereign bonds.

Eventually the ingress of capital to the USD will peak and the US economy will choked by the collapse of Europe and hence the rest of the world. Then we will have a global collapse and a monetary reset. So look for the global economy to become really horrible 2019 - 2020. But 2018 should be start in earnest of the Minsky Moment collapse of the Eurozone.

His thesis is China and Asia will bottom 2020, while the West will continue to spiral down into the abyss for many years hence. By 2033, Singapore and Shanghai will have replaced London and New York as the financial capitals of the world.

We are headed into a tempest. I am not very enthused about any tangible assets because the governments are going to be forced to tax and sequester (i.e. confiscate) everything they can get their hands on. I think even gold has lost most of its utility in such a crisis.

On the more bizarre point of view I offer the following which perhaps you should not view entirely seriously right now...

My thesis is fungible money is dying along with the industrial age.

You could try to do business in Asia, but you will likely be at a disadvantage being a non-Chinese. Philippine born Chinese even control the government and economy here in the Philippines where I am.

I would try to have investments in knowledge age businesses if at all possible.

My desire is to launch a blockchain project that will make such investments more readily feasible for you with a fungible token as the base of such a system that drives massive knowledge trading activity. But at the moment, I am still undergoing treatment for whole body disseminated Tuberculosis (meaning that bacterium is/was every where in lymph nodes, digestive system, brain, etc). This treatment is toxic and not even sure to work if I have MDR-TB (which is more likely for me given my location and historical pattern of exposure). Thus at the moment I am not able to work (code/program, etc) at the level I am accustomed to be before I got ill. So at this time I am very frustrated and am not sure if I can complete my project effectively. There are new better cures coming from the http://TBalliance.org, but I think it is not possible for me to get access to those medicines until years hence, unless one of you readers has a connection and could help me? I'm 10 weeks into treatment and not totally convinced if I am improving or not. Very toxic to the liver. Very fatigued and cognitively fatigued.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
This is bouncing up and down, but slowly moving upwards. It just exceeded 59% for the first time:

http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

Nearly 60%:

345/576 (59.90%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

60% threshold breached!

348/576 (60.42%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

It's happening!

355/576 (61.63%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
I expect Ripple to collapse as the sovereign debt crisis goes into defaults probably next year.

Can you elaborate on this, or point to where you have already elaborated on this?

What do you recommend people invest in outside of cryptocurrency right now?  Seems like you're stuck with real estate, equities or bonds at the moment.  I feel like there's far too much fiat chasing far too few correctly-priced investments.  What's your take?
sr. member
Activity: 399
Merit: 250

That idiot who replied to you didn't understand what MP wrote.

MP is stating that when I deposit $1000 in a bank and get IOU back (which I can trade a la the gold certificates of private banking in the 1800s), then I expect to be paid an interest rate and I expect that bank to make a statement as how many IOUs they will issue relative to reserves they have in the vault. Ripple does neither.


Well to be fair it seems this is more a criticism of banking in general, not Ripple. I'm not aware of Ripple claiming they'd reform banking practices. From my understanding they're simply designing a system that can allow banks to operate more efficiently.

Quote
And MP also states correctly that Ripple places all those who receive IOUs from the same entity on equal footing, which the idiot who replied to you didn't seem to grasp. The reason this is bad, is because then I can't sue that issuer without a class action lawsuit. And large players can't negotiate for seniority in a default liquidation scenario.

In other words, Ripple has none of the features required for private banking to function correctly.

I would be happy if you posted my rebuttals there.

I'll leave it at that. Unless you want to further discuss over there. I'm just taking it all into consideration and not looking to really go back and forth too much.

Quote
Perhaps banks think they will like Ripple because they can use it just as settlement layer and have their own side agreements on the aspects which Ripple doesn't enforce:

Fundamentally, Ripple has a much better chance of getting regulated and being brought to a major market, like NYSE or BATS, than bitcoin because it is more centralized. There is also a lot of banks around the world that are looking at ripple as a form of real-time gross settlement. To banks, a system like Ripple has a lot of advantages over bitcoin . Banks really aren't interested in "alternative money" like Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies , they're interested in the underlying distributed ledger technology, and that is exactly what Ripple is. They WANT more control over the system, they don't want to give up control to miners who are securing the network based on the price of the currency, they like distributed ledgers because they can actually give banks more control over their back-end systems, bitcoin will probably never be used for this, and as such, Bitcoin and Ripple should be seen as completely different technologies. Some people like to say Ripple has no value because it is centralized, or because the fundamentals are so different from Bitcoin , but that is simply not the case. It is just valuable for different reasons and big Banks definitely see the value in Ripple, while they've been pretty cold towards Bitcoin . This sets the stage for Ripple to have a pretty massive long-term bull-run now that all the weak hands are out of the market and new money is flowing into cryptocurrency .

See also:

https://www.quora.com/Does-Ripple-have-a-chance-of-disrupting-the-banking-industry
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/40530/why-banks-are-trying-consensus-algorithms-like-ripple
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/22/banks-trial-ripple-blockchain-to-make-international-money-transfers-like-sending-an-imessage.html
https://ripple.com/insights/how-banks-use-ripple/

I'll do some further reading. thanks.

Quote

The problem for Ripple is what is the fungible unit of transfer? So banks are going to transfer XRP? Then how can they do fractional reserve banking because Ripple doesn't allow transferring XRP minted by a private bank, unlike Lightning Networks which is in theory could if users blindly trust the centralized hubs.

Ripple would only be useful for trades between banks on their mutual trust of their own USD.chase, EU.sandanter, etc..

I expect Ripple to collapse as the sovereign debt crisis goes into defaults probably next year.

So some soon to be non-existent banks like Ripple. Who cares.

Well, that was my point earlier. I don't see banks becoming non-existent "soon". Are you talking 5, 10 or 20 years when you say that?
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Putting that aside however and thinking realistically, I don't see banks going anywhere in the short - medium term. As a speculator/investor, I'd like to play both sides so that I win either way or hopefully BOTH at the same time.

Ripple is the tech that banks need to remain somewhat relevant going forward in today's globalized economy.

There is something very strange going on with Ripple. Its features are entirely incompatible with sound banking. So it can't be for banking. Whereas LN on Litecoin will be compatible with sound private fractional reserves in alignment with Nash's ideal money concept (with the failure mode being long-term when Bitcoin becomes controlled by one whale due to concentrating effect of fungible finance).

I wonder if Ripple is a bet on corrupt fiat system finding a way to force all public funds and banks into a system which self-destructs? Some people seem to think Ripple is more compatible with governments and laws?

I really can't find any logic in it at all except that speculators will buy anything that the other dumb speculators will associate progress even though it isn't.

I'd be very wary of holding Ripple as it appears to me to be an extremely volatile greater fool speculation (raping) tool. Ripple is having its 2nd hump adoption (similar chart pattern to LTC).

And I think that is the utility of Ripple. It is way to separate more fools from their capital. So get on board and join the musical chairs raping party. Just pray you get out in time.


I have thrown the question out on XRPChat https://www.xrpchat.com/topic/3551-ripples-fatal-defects-would-like-to-hear-an-expert-rebuttal-please/


Quote
Ripple Consensus Ledger (RCL) is not difficult to understand.

- RCL is about trustlines and IOUs
- Every account on RCL can issue an IOU. E.g. I can issue USD.roborovskii or EUR.roborovskii or XAU.roborovskii, basically anything except XRP which is the reserved native token.
- Another person may also issue IOUs, but theirs would be seen as USD.anotherperson, EUR.anotherperson, CNY.anotherperson, etc.
- Note that on RCL you may not see USD.anotherperson, but the actual account address (USD.rxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

- Nobody needs to trust anyone blindly. This is where trustlines come in. Trustlines are simply how much you are willing to trust another party holding an IOU for you.
- E.g. You deposit 1000 USD into bitstamp through the usual banking transaction. You NEED to set a trustline to bitstamp on RCL for at least 1000 USD, or bitstamp will not be able to credit 1000 USD.bitstamp to your RCL account.
- Once you do that, bitstamp can then send 1000 USD.bitstamp to you.
- It is a common problem that new users forget (or do not know how) to set the trustlines. They deposit the money, and wonder why they have not yet received it on RCL.

- The main misunderstanding (or ignorance) in that written piece of garbage, is that you could receive anyone's IOU (e.g. USD.scammer). This is not possible if you do not have a trustline setup to trust 'scammer'.
- E.g. If you had the 1000 USD.bitstamp deposited earlier, and you want to pay your friend through RCL 10 USD, you will NOT be able to send him the 10 USD.bitstamp if he does not have a trustline setup to bitstamp.
- Maybe he only has a trustline setup to gatehub. In this case he can ONLY receive USD.gatehub

So this problem of sending your friend USD who has a different trusted gateway; is where the magic of rippling occurs:
- On RCL there are market makers, there would be a currency (or IOU) pair that trades between USD.bitstamp and USD.gatehub.
- Ideally this would be 1:1 being the same currency, but not always. For the following example, let's say it's an ideal 1:1
- When you send your friend 10 USD.bitstamp on RCL, he would receive 10 USD.gatehub through the rippling process that the market makers help to bridge.
- If you had a friend in Japan who only trusted JPY.MrRipple, sending him 10 USD.gatehub would bring out an option for him to receive 1115 JPY.MrRipple.
- This again is bridged by market-makers trading the pair USD.gatehub : JPY.MrRipple

To sum it up, you cannot receive an IOU that you do not have a trustline setup to. What the sender CAN see are the available routes and IOUs that you can receive (that you have existing trustlines with).

The written piece is by someone who is ignorant of how RCL works, and criticizes through his boneheadedness. This is a common trait of "bitcoiners" you see on Polo and elsewhere.



I am following the lead of banks who are testing and backing Ripple. Perhaps it will blow up on them, but that remains to be seen.

That idiot who replied to you didn't understand what MP wrote.

MP is stating that when I deposit $1000 in a bank and get IOU back (which I can trade a la the gold certificates of private banking in the 1800s), then I expect to be paid an interest rate and I expect that bank to make a statement as how many IOUs they will issue relative to reserves they have in the vault. Ripple does neither.

And MP also states correctly that Ripple places all those who receive IOUs from the same entity on equal footing, which the idiot who replied to you didn't seem to grasp. The reason this is bad, is because then I can't sue that issuer without a class action lawsuit. And large players can't negotiate for seniority in a default liquidation scenario.

In other words, Ripple has none of the features required for private banking to function correctly.

I would be happy if you posted my rebuttals there.

Perhaps banks think they will like Ripple because they can use it just as settlement layer and have their own side agreements on the aspects which Ripple doesn't enforce:

Fundamentally, Ripple has a much better chance of getting regulated and being brought to a major market, like NYSE or BATS, than bitcoin because it is more centralized. There is also a lot of banks around the world that are looking at ripple as a form of real-time gross settlement. To banks, a system like Ripple has a lot of advantages over bitcoin . Banks really aren't interested in "alternative money" like Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies , they're interested in the underlying distributed ledger technology, and that is exactly what Ripple is. They WANT more control over the system, they don't want to give up control to miners who are securing the network based on the price of the currency, they like distributed ledgers because they can actually give banks more control over their back-end systems, bitcoin will probably never be used for this, and as such, Bitcoin and Ripple should be seen as completely different technologies. Some people like to say Ripple has no value because it is centralized, or because the fundamentals are so different from Bitcoin , but that is simply not the case. It is just valuable for different reasons and big Banks definitely see the value in Ripple, while they've been pretty cold towards Bitcoin . This sets the stage for Ripple to have a pretty massive long-term bull-run now that all the weak hands are out of the market and new money is flowing into cryptocurrency .

See also:

https://www.quora.com/Does-Ripple-have-a-chance-of-disrupting-the-banking-industry
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/40530/why-banks-are-trying-consensus-algorithms-like-ripple
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/22/banks-trial-ripple-blockchain-to-make-international-money-transfers-like-sending-an-imessage.html
https://ripple.com/insights/how-banks-use-ripple/


The problem for Ripple is what is the fungible unit of transfer? So banks are going to transfer XRP? Then how can they do fractional reserve banking because Ripple doesn't allow transferring XRP minted by a private bank, unlike Lightning Networks which is in theory could if users blindly trust the centralized hubs.

Ripple would only be useful for trades between banks on their mutual trust of their own USD.chase, EU.sandanter, etc..

I expect Ripple to collapse as the sovereign debt crisis goes into defaults probably next year.

So some soon to be non-existent banks like Ripple. Who cares.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
This is bouncing up and down, but slowly moving upwards. It just exceeded 59% for the first time:

http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

Nearly 60%:

345/576 (59.90%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!

60% threshold breached!

348/576 (60.42%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
This is bouncing up and down, but slowly moving upwards. It just exceeded 59% for the first time:

http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

Nearly 60%:

345/576 (59.90%) blocks signaling in the past 24 hours!
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Speaking about reddit, I was checking out the litecoin one and saw this comment:

https://www.reddit.com/r/litecoin/comments/632yau/i_just_rented_some_hash_to_support_segwit/dfr0x1g/

So according to this guy's calculations it would take around $1million "only".

Litecoin will take care of itself. Charlie Lee's brother owns warehouses full of GPUs he can stop mining ETH and mine LTC when they are ready to activate. Bobby Lee of BTCC also has warehouses of Scrypt ASICs mining Litecoin, so he has every profit incentive to do so. Bobby Lee got into mining because of his brother. 'Nuff said.

The economic majority wins. Those who are buying LTC now are doing so because they want SegWit to be activated. Jihian Wu of Bitmain who is blocking SegWit on both LTC and BTC, created the new more efficient Scrypt miners, so I didn't realize this before. They could monopolize these in theory. So this fight might not be as easy as I thought. But the economic majority should win, unless it lacks resolve and/or patience. Already people are arbitraging and finding ways to rent hashrate in order to earn money and support SegWit. If you think the price is going up, you try to lock in a rental price that doesn't increase as the price rises, so you can profit. Others may be buying A4s if they want to maximize profits and believe the price will remain high (and going higher).

Jihan Wu needs to get his ass kicked economically so both Bitcoin and Litecoin can move forward.

It is most likely that BU is a diversionary lie. These miners simply want to gouge high fees on Bitcoin and block any alternatives. They were never going to fork with BU. It was a lie to prevent everyone from joining together to kick Jihan's ass.

If my health will improve or stabilize, my plan is to launch a Bitcoin Killer which doesn't require PoW (the design is already completed). I want to bankrupt all these miners. Their vested interests are a pain in the ass. We need to kick all their arses out into the street and turn their ASICs into door stops. I am talking long-term plan.

Those who are buying ASICs now, my plans are a year or more away from reaching any relevancy or size, so fear not. Buy A4s and profit.



Both you guys are obstructionist wolves in sheepskin. You pretend you want to make progress but you are intentionally stalling. Any one with a brain stem can see right through your deceit.

ProHashing is not signaling SegWit thus they are an obstructionist. Their words are meaningless. In a meritocracy only actions count.

"Talk is cheap, show me the code", wrote Linus Torvalds

Also it is quite clear that BU never intended to fork Bitcoin with that Buggy Unlimited piece-of-shit, because they know damn well the economics of Bitcoin are that the whales can and will destroy any miners who attempt to fork Bitcoin. I explained this in great detail on BCT.

BU is a lie and diversionary tactic in order to fool everyone. The real goal of Jihan Wu is to gouge maximize transaction fees from Bitcoin and block any alternatives for scaling. These obstructionists are blocking progress on both Bitcoin and Litecoin, because Bitcoin depends on Litecoin to add off chain scaling, because the whales of Bitcoin will never allow SegWit on Bitcon. Period. ProHashing by their actions is complicit. Words are meaningless.

Look at your conflicting statements:

Quote from: ProHashing pool
He states that we oppose Segregated Witness, which is true. We do not think that SegWit is the best course for bitcoin or litecoin.

Quote from: ProHashing pool
We do intend to implement SegWit

Quote from: ProHashing pool
A majority of customers have requested SegWit, so we plan to implement it.

Stalling. Deceit. An obstructionist wolf in sheepskin.

Quote from: ProHashing pool
the IRS doesn't move its deadline back because of SegWit, and we won't have any business at all if they come after us

Miners should leave such an incompetent company.

Whining in a forum about not being able to do your accounting at the same time you do your technical work.

Of course it is quite clear you are just lying and deceitful.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
Don't you love this. Got to dump all the weak hands off the rocket before we move past $10. They are taking their 50% profits and running away scared.

Big time gains are for those who have conviction in the hard facts.

The insiders such as BTCC are ostensibly quietly waiting to push this over 75% activation threshold later around the $30 price level so they can send it crazy shooting past $50. Very clever the way they are playing. Why waste that event at such low price levels. Let it build first. Kudos.

Weak hands goodbye losers.

I wanted to ask you, is now the good time to buy some extra LTC for holding or can we expect a correction soon? Thank you
Pages:
Jump to: