It was a mistake to bring him, it is a mistake to keep him. The biggest mistake of them all would be to play him and fair play to Ten Hag for having the balls not to.
Yeah, well if that's actually the case then you have to show him who's boss, but he probably shouldn't even be on the bench and send him to the stands instead, especially if you don't have any intent to play him. It's a shame because everyone wants to see him play. You would think Ronnie knows the score by now though, but I'm sure we don't know the whole details and the excuses Hag was giving was just the 'political' answer. I wonder where he's going to go? Probably not many options for him right now and if he gets a rep for being stubborn or crying when he doesn't get his own way a lot of teams probably won't erven bother with him.
I read recently that if both Portugal and Argentina finish first in their World Cup groups then they could both meet in the final. Now that's something I'd love to see. Would definitely help settle the GOAT debate.
It was a mistake to bring him, it is a mistake to keep him. The biggest mistake of them all would be to play him and fair play to Ten Hag for having the balls not to.
I think Manchester United cannot afford to play without him despite many thinking he is a toxic person now for Manchester United,we saw the other players and although they are much younger they could not help Manchester United in a key game against Manchester City.For the upcoming part of the season at least until January they should focus more to bring him to play if Man United fans and their coach want to see United up the ladder otherwise without him at the front of attacking I see this as very difficult to happen.
Definitely a catch-22 for Man U as they can't afford to be benching him really. Hopefully he just learns now that he's not above being benched.