Author

Topic: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread - page 211. (Read 140740 times)

legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Ronaldo failed to show respect multiple times to his coaching staff and his teammates. He's become a toxic diva, one who's also playing below the level of a Man United striker.

It was a mistake to bring him, it is a mistake to keep him. The biggest mistake of them all would be to play him and fair play to Ten Hag for having the balls not to.

Yeah, well if that's actually the case then you have to show him who's boss, but he probably shouldn't even be on the bench and send him to the stands instead, especially if you don't have any intent to play him. It's a shame because everyone wants to see him play. You would think Ronnie knows the score by now though, but I'm sure we don't know the whole details and the excuses Hag was giving was just the 'political' answer. I wonder where he's going to go? Probably not many options for him right now and if he gets a rep for being stubborn or crying when he doesn't get his own way a lot of teams probably won't erven bother with him.

I read recently that if both Portugal and Argentina finish first in their World Cup groups then they could both meet in the final. Now that's something I'd love to see. Would definitely help settle the GOAT debate.

Ronaldo failed to show respect multiple times to his coaching staff and his teammates. He's become a toxic diva, one who's also playing below the level of a Man United striker.

It was a mistake to bring him, it is a mistake to keep him. The biggest mistake of them all would be to play him and fair play to Ten Hag for having the balls not to.

I think Manchester United cannot afford to play without him despite many thinking he is a toxic person now for Manchester United,we saw the other players and although they are much younger they could not help Manchester United in a key game against Manchester City.For the upcoming part of the season at least until January they should focus more to bring him to play if Man United fans and their coach want to see United up the ladder otherwise without him at the front of attacking I see this as very difficult to happen.

Definitely a catch-22 for Man U as they can't afford to be benching him really. Hopefully he just learns now that he's not above being benched.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1951
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's time for Ten Hagu to worry not about Ronaldo, but about himself - with such results, he will be thrown out of the club very quickly. I don't think he was taken to the club with the condition that United could hang around in the 6th-7th place and get humiliating defeats from time to time (a complete repetition of last season). A few (largely accidental) victories seem to have given Ten Hag the audacity to continue to ignore Ronaldo - the problem is that United still play badly. The tension from the fans is already high, if the management is also unhappy, then soon Ten Hag will have to pack his things.

But Ronaldo actually has become a liability tactically.  Ten Hag has to change how the squad plays when Ronaldo is up there spear heading the attack because he doesn't do much when they don't have the ball.  It ends with a couple of guys being forced to be out if position to make up for it.

United just needs to rebuild from scratch.  Something they should've done after Ferguson left almost 10 years ago.  Damn..  It's been almost a decade now.  Lol.  Maybe they're due for a resurgence in a couple of years.

Ok, I can believe that the highest scoring striker ever and United's best player last season has become a liability this season, no problem. And let's say Ten Hag is right about not giving Ronaldo any playing time. The problem is that United still play like crap. Do you understand it? Ronaldo is sitting on the bench and United are playing like shit - who's to blame? Ronaldo (because he doesn't put much pressure and doesn't do much teamwork on the bench) or Ten Hag who ends up with a pretty expensive squad and ends up with a shitty result?  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1247
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
Ronaldo failed to show respect multiple times to his coaching staff and his teammates. He's become a toxic diva, one who's also playing below the level of a Man United striker.

It was a mistake to bring him, it is a mistake to keep him. The biggest mistake of them all would be to play him and fair play to Ten Hag for having the balls not to.

I think Manchester United cannot afford to play without him despite many thinking he is a toxic person now for Manchester United,we saw the other players and although they are much younger they could not help Manchester United in a key game against Manchester City.For the upcoming part of the season at least until January they should focus more to bring him to play if Man United fans and their coach want to see United up the ladder otherwise without him at the front of attacking I see this as very difficult to happen.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1571
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Ronaldo failed to show respect multiple times to his coaching staff and his teammates. He's become a toxic diva, one who's also playing below the level of a Man United striker.

It was a mistake to bring him, it is a mistake to keep him. The biggest mistake of them all would be to play him and fair play to Ten Hag for having the balls not to.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
In my opinion dropping your star player isn't necessarily good management. Obviously, he'll get the praise because he has the balls to do it. However, good management would be changing Ronaldo's attitude. Ferguson knew the type of player Ronaldo was, and he has always had a attitude issue, or perhaps some would say arrogant? That's not exactly a criticism, since most players at that level believe in themselves quite a lot it does come across as arrogant.

I'd like to think it's a current tactical change due to him obviously negatively effecting the team. However, United have improved, but they still aren't a team that will be challenging for anything soon. The problem is more than Ronaldo.

I agree. We don't know the whole situation so it's hard to say what is right and wrong, but it's often that ego and arrogance that drives a lot of top level athletes and even musicians to get to that elite level in the first place. If you didn't have so much self-belief you probably wouldn't get very far. There's a line from Drake that says  I am the greatest and I said that even before I knew I was but I think he was quoting Muhammed Ali. There's of lots of stuff from Kanye West before he was famous that's ridiculously egotistical but it's their own self-belief and arrogance that is their fuel to get where they want to be. Obviously Ronaldo has a massive ego and probably throws a tantrum when he doesn't get his own way and that's hard to handle for a manager. You need to learn to babysit them because you can't just let them walk all over you or backseat manage, but you also can't give into their every whim. If a player is disrespecting the team or manager and not playing by the rules you have to bench them sometimes to show them who's boss.



I agree with Hilarious, it's just pretty much absurd for not letting him leave when he had the opportunity to leave, and that's all just so he could rot away on the bench, It would have made sense if they're actually doing very better without Ronaldo, then I'd understand the reason for not starting him, ETH saying he didn't want to bring him into the game that has been lost but brought in Casemiro and most disrepectfully to also play Martial who have been out injured for the past 5 weeks ahead of Ronaldo, it's just doesn't make much sense imo!

I don't think it would have come down to not letting him leave but time just run out on getting a deal done. Probably both the club and Ronaldo wanted him to go but their options were limited. Ronaldo would only go to a top tier club that is in the CL and there's not many clubs that can even afford him, and even the super-big clubs have probably already blown their budget on other players so can't buy him even if they wanted to. Also, Ronaldo isn't going to leave for less money and United aren't going to let him go at a bargain price so it's a catch-22. I'm sure they were trying to get rid of him right up to transfer deadline day and by the looks of it with Ronaldo not turning up for pre-season stuff he probably thought he was likely to go as well but deals probably just fell through for whatever reason. I'd be very surprised if he doesn't leave in the next window, though maybe there's still not many options as to who can afford him.  
copper member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 793
I had a real stinker of a week, 4.5 points which was one of the lowest points in our pool. Good thing it’s a long season I guess Cheesy

Congrats to Harkorede with the yellow cap, well done Sir.

Thanks mate  Cool

you already ahead me. Not sure how, maybe you got slam point.
Anyway, two yellow caps in a row and third in whole season probably would be too good for me Cheesy. Yeah, you get free bet for yellow cap. So, congrats again you bastard Cheesy.

I only beat you to the yellow cap by getting an extra slam spoint, I had 8 right outcomes, which gives me 2 slam point, instead of the 1 slam point you get for 6-7 outcomes.


Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".

This is just classic management BS when they don't actually want to give the real reason. Ronnie sat on the bench is already pretty disrespectful to him and the fans not to mention pissing away millions for him to warm the bench. Looking at his face during the match it looked like he wanted to come on and I'm sure he's been itching to do so. Bringing him on for the last 5-10 minutes might have been disrespectful but they should have just done it at half time. You make changes then to try turn the game round. Given that Man U actually managed to get 3 in the end it could have been a different story if he was brought on. Regardless, he should have started. I'm sure it's not down to fitness but attitudes or egos.

You are probably right, we all know he wanted to leave during the summer and basically his manager offered him to all top clubs playing in Champions League and that probably did not sit very well with United management or coach. Putting him in his place, but that is not something you do the legend at the end of his career. That is something you do to up and coming player to make him change his habits. If you have Ronaldo, you either use him or get rid of him asap.

I agree with Hilarious, it's just pretty much absurd for not letting him leave when he had the opportunity to leave, and that's all just so he could rot away on the bench, It would have made sense if they're actually doing very better without Ronaldo, then I'd understand the reason for not starting him, ETH saying he didn't want to bring him into the game that has been lost but brought in Casemiro and most disrepectfully to also play Martial who have been out injured for the past 5 weeks ahead of Ronaldo, it's just doesn't make much sense imo!
staff
Activity: 3304
Merit: 4115
In my opinion dropping your star player isn't necessarily good management. Obviously, he'll get the praise because he has the balls to do it. However, good management would be changing Ronaldo's attitude. Ferguson knew the type of player Ronaldo was, and he has always had a attitude issue, or perhaps some would say arrogant? That's not exactly a criticism, since most players at that level believe in themselves quite a lot it does come across as arrogant.

I'd like to think it's a current tactical change due to him obviously negatively effecting the team. However, United have improved, but they still aren't a team that will be challenging for anything soon. The problem is more than Ronaldo.
legendary
Activity: 3976
Merit: 1421
Life, Love and Laughter...
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.
Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".

It's time for Ten Hagu to worry not about Ronaldo, but about himself - with such results, he will be thrown out of the club very quickly. I don't think he was taken to the club with the condition that United could hang around in the 6th-7th place and get humiliating defeats from time to time (a complete repetition of last season). A few (largely accidental) victories seem to have given Ten Hag the audacity to continue to ignore Ronaldo - the problem is that United still play badly. The tension from the fans is already high, if the management is also unhappy, then soon Ten Hag will have to pack his things.

But Ronaldo actually has become a liability tactically.  Ten Hag has to change how the squad plays when Ronaldo is up there spear heading the attack because he doesn't do much when they don't have the ball.  It ends with a couple of guys being forced to be out if position to make up for it.

United just needs to rebuild from scratch.  Something they should've done after Ferguson left almost 10 years ago.  Damn..  It's been almost a decade now.  Lol.  Maybe they're due for a resurgence in a couple of years.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
Moreso, I finally get to win the Yellow cap after 8 rounds, I really didn't see this coming, IRRC I believe there is a Free bet for best player of the round right ? If yes, at least that'd basically mean I've got my buy-in fee right back, so there's nothing to lose.
Congrats, you took Yellow cap from me in last minute. I think I was 0.5 point ahead before Leicester game, we both got 1 point from that game and after it you already ahead me. Not sure how, maybe you got slam point.
Anyway, two yellow caps in a row and third in whole season probably would be too good for me Cheesy. Yeah, you get free bet for yellow cap. So, congrats again you bastard Cheesy.
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2691
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.
Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".

This is just classic management BS when they don't actually want to give the real reason. Ronnie sat on the bench is already pretty disrespectful to him and the fans not to mention pissing away millions for him to warm the bench. Looking at his face during the match it looked like he wanted to come on and I'm sure he's been itching to do so. Bringing him on for the last 5-10 minutes might have been disrespectful but they should have just done it at half time. You make changes then to try turn the game round. Given that Man U actually managed to get 3 in the end it could have been a different story if he was brought on. Regardless, he should have started. I'm sure it's not down to fitness but attitudes or egos.

You are probably right, we all know he wanted to leave during the summer and basically his manager offered him to all top clubs playing in Champions League and that probably did not sit very well with United management or coach. Putting him in his place, but that is not something you do the legend at the end of his career. That is something you do to up and coming player to make him change his habits. If you have Ronaldo, you either use him or get rid of him asap.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.
Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".

This is just classic management BS when they don't actually want to give the real reason. Ronnie sat on the bench is already pretty disrespectful to him and the fans not to mention pissing away millions for him to warm the bench. Looking at his face during the match it looked like he wanted to come on and I'm sure he's been itching to do so. Bringing him on for the last 5-10 minutes might have been disrespectful but they should have just done it at half time. You make changes then to try turn the game round. Given that Man U actually managed to get 3 in the end it could have been a different story if he was brought on. Regardless, he should have started. I'm sure it's not down to fitness but attitudes or egos.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
I had a real stinker of a week, 4.5 points which was one of the lowest points in our pool. Good thing it’s a long season I guess Cheesy

Congrats to Harkorede with the yellow cap, well done Sir.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1951
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.
Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".

It's time for Ten Hagu to worry not about Ronaldo, but about himself - with such results, he will be thrown out of the club very quickly. I don't think he was taken to the club with the condition that United could hang around in the 6th-7th place and get humiliating defeats from time to time (a complete repetition of last season). A few (largely accidental) victories seem to have given Ten Hag the audacity to continue to ignore Ronaldo - the problem is that United still play badly. The tension from the fans is already high, if the management is also unhappy, then soon Ten Hag will have to pack his things.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1247
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.
Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".

That is a nice deceiving statement,the truth is the new manager of United it looks like he does not like Ronaldo,he insisted on keeping him out in most of the games despite him starting the season with humiliating loses against weak teams of the Premier League.When he started winning after those 2 initial games everybody forgot about Ronaldo as long as the team was winning,when they lost big this weekend against their derby rivals of City and with a tennis result the fans ask desperate things like why don't you made Ronaldo play.

We need to see how things will turn out in the upcoming games where hopefully the form will be up and if the coach still does not play him something must be wrong between the two.
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2691
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.
Statements from manager are logical and maybe even actual truth but you never know if it is the state of things or just power plays.

He said that Ronaldo is not in first 11 because he missed pre season and isn't in peak form yet. When asked why he did not bring him in later on he answered something like "Ronaldo is one of the greats of this sport and I did not want to bring him in the game which was already lost".
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Does anyone know the reason why Man U are not starting or even playing Ronaldo? Is it some sort of power play cos Ronnie has been a dram queen or was trying to the run the squad himself, or is it just because of the transfer drama and him obviously not wanting to be there? Either way, not bringing him on at half time when you're 4-0 down is silly. If anyone could have turned that game around it was him.

I got this weird itch to put silly money on Leicester tonight to make up for everything over the weekend... 18/10 looks impossible value at home against a promoted side, and Brendan needs his job.

Am I digging a hole for myself or making a smart recovery?
In hindsight, definitely a smart recover. This one was a freebie from the bookies, as I have been preaching whole week in Fantasy topic, Leicester is actually very good going forward and I expected them to score few tonight with big contribution from Maddison. What I did not expect was a clean sheet in the process, I went with 3:1 in the pool and even considered 4:2. If NFO managed to score that one goal all my bets would pass, including a crazy betbilder where I had Maddison to score 2 or more goals and bunch of other stuff.

I put a few sats on the underdog, but hey, that's what I do.

I hadn't had a chance to see Leicester to play so far this season, so I was mostly going by their record.  I've had the full match streaming while I finish up some work, and I agree.  In retrospect they look a lot better than their record would indicate.  They've had a rough schedule so far this year, they might provide some more bargains in the weeks to come.

Of course the question remains about today's match, is Leicester that good, or is Forest really that bad?  Forest was so dominant in EFL Championship last year, I really expected more of them.  Today they looked nothing like a Premier League team.

Leicester have had bad results this season but they're not a bad team. Definitely not as bad as Forest hence why I got the home win correct on that one. Don't really know what's happened to them though to be honest. I'm sure they'll turn their form around now.
staff
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1610
The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛
Buwaytress did you stick to your Leicester City game plan bro. ?

I did, so yes, am a happy guy. Don't really like when I do it (big MLs to claw back losses) but it worked out Wink
Oh, that's good to hear; the last goal by Leicester City ruined my acca; I went with Under 3.5 goals at 1.45, which was a good odd tbh. I expected a tough Monday game with fewer goals, but it was the opposite. Leicester deserved it; they play good attacking football, and I hope they give Rodgers more time to turn things around. What are your current thoughts on the UCL? (Please respond to me on the UCL thread; I'm ready for some in-depth match analysis today.)

I know I said it before but Southgate is deliberately blind when he says he has no creative midfielder to call upon. If he still doesn't pick him for WC...
Long before Southgate arrived, the England squad was based on player PR rather than player abilities. Is there anyone in that region willing to prove me wrong? In any case, it's going to be a lengthy discussion

Don't cry or laugh when Southgate chooses Jude Belligham, Jordan Henderson, and Jack Grellish over Maddison for his World Cup 25-man squad. My 13-year-old daughter can tell who is the better midfielder..
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Buwaytress did you stick to your Leicester City game plan bro. ?

I did, so yes, am a happy guy. Don't really like when I do it (big MLs to claw back losses) but it worked out Wink

Am I digging a hole for myself or making a smart recovery?
In hindsight, definitely a smart recover. This one was a freebie from the bookies, as I have been preaching whole week in Fantasy topic, Leicester is actually very good going forward and I expected them to score few tonight with big contribution from Maddison. What I did not expect was a clean sheet in the process, I went with 3:1 in the pool and even considered 4:2. If NFO managed to score that one goal all my bets would pass, including a crazy betbilder where I had Maddison to score 2 or more goals and bunch of other stuff.

Yeah, you have no idea how my heart fluttered when Awoniyi was through on goal and his shot went back off the post... if that had gone in, who knows how the game would have gone. First goal took a huge deflection but everything else after that was legitimate great football. Apparently first time that all 3 first half goals came from outside pen box in EPL, according to commentator.

Even Vardy looked so good, only no goal to his name.

I know I said it before but Southgate is deliberately blind when he says he has no creative midfielder to call upon. If he still doesn't pick him for WC...


I put a few sats on the underdog, but hey, that's what I do.

I hadn't had a chance to see Leicester to play so far this season, so I was mostly going by their record.  I've had the full match streaming while I finish up some work, and I agree.  In retrospect they look a lot better than their record would indicate.  They've had a rough schedule so far this year, they might provide some more bargains in the weeks to come.

Of course the question remains about today's match, is Leicester that good, or is Forest really that bad?  Forest was so dominant in EFL Championship last year, I really expected more of them.  Today they looked nothing like a Premier League team.

They have been a lot better than result suggest, so yeah, they got their first win, more than deserved, and I recovered my week's losses, quite
easily as it turns out. Shouldn't have done that though, but I'm happy Wink
staff
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1610
The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛
Leicester clean sheet, amazing!

On inplay, the only option I consider is HT under 1.2 or 2.5.
@10 and most of the time @1.15 odds for English Premier League games, then HT 0.5 for Championship games, but it's a waste of time; the best thing to do now is ignore Liverpool.

HBP; High blood pressure.   Grin


Ah lol high blood pressure got it. Here we just say "tension" it's like a favorite word to cover football stress, and second favorite word is "frus" to mean frustrated, which I guess is common for most teams except City.

Seems to me betting live is good odds for when comeback teams go down goals like City and Liverpool (though this season Liverpool only came back once to win so far).

Lol Yeah, I was wrong about the Leicester City game, but it shows how bad Nottingham Forest are. These guys are shit to have conceded four goals to a shitty Leicester City with the league's worst defense. I've previously stated that Nottingham Forest would receive fewer points at the end of the season than the number of players they brought in (24). Is the DOF who proposed the team revamp still on the job? Those promoted kids could have done a better job than the 24 deadwoods they brought in.


This season, they are competing with Loserpool to see who is the most shit. Such a downfall gives goosebumps.




Buwaytress did you stick to your Leicester City game plan bro. ?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1226
Livecasino, 20% cashback, no fuss payouts.
Leicester clean sheet, amazing!

On inplay, the only option I consider is HT under 1.2 or 2.5.
@10 and most of the time @1.15 odds for English Premier League games, then HT 0.5 for Championship games, but it's a waste of time; the best thing to do now is ignore Liverpool.

HBP; High blood pressure.   Grin


Ah lol high blood pressure got it. Here we just say "tension" it's like a favorite word to cover football stress, and second favorite word is "frus" to mean frustrated, which I guess is common for most teams except City.

Seems to me betting live is good odds for when comeback teams go down goals like City and Liverpool (though this season Liverpool only came back once to win so far).
Jump to: