Sheriff? Don't you have to be among the elite to be that?
He's barely a deputy, and even the sheriffs are always in Mafia's pockets - everybody knows that.
I like the late submission rule, and it meaning an automatic loss for the player, I however don't agree with the potential -4 points, that is the penalty points, I believe one should not lose more point than they can gain from a specific round, in that light I suggest that penalty points should be an independent entity on it's own, and not technically associated with a user accrued points in the league, for unforeseen circumstance beyond human decision anyone could miss a round, I mean even team Cro2 stands a chance of failing to have a question available for despite that never being the case due to their extreme professionalism.
Penalty points would be better off being independent like I aforementioned, just like the VAR, let's say the maximum number of penalty (warning) points every user can get per season is proportional in terms of %age to the number of fixture available to them for that season, perhaps a maximum of 2-3 penalty points before an automatic relegation consideration regardless of where the user finishes by the end of the season while the first person on the relegation table if consistent enough with their submission gets to stay another season in their current division.
The penalty won't be -4 points, it will be the loss of the round, -3 GD and -1 point in the standings.
To be honest - I don't like extremely strict rules. But this is becoming a 10k$ prize pool competition in which we have to have the same rules for everybody.
Considering the nature of questions (different in dates, H2H number and complexity), sometimes a late submission made 2 of your questions invalid, and sometimes 5 of them. Not quite fair - which is the main driver behind the 'no tolerance' decision.
Speaking of VAR rules, did any club use all three trials last season? Nah? I used only 1/3 last season; is it possible to carry over the remaining two to next season?
I hardly ever use it regardless, just a suggestion.
I don't think so, no. We're happy with where VAR is at the moment and there are no plans to change it for the next season. 3 VAR's per player, and we'll track it of course.
Now there's an incentive to submit early, so we expect VAR to be used a bit more often.