7 x Vega 64 Rig 10480 K/H Heavy
https://picload.org/view/dorrloli/srb.jpg.html
again a gmail send mail to my self support on miner reboot would be great !
Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 305. (Read 237247 times)
April 24, 2018, 08:22:19 AM
Big thx again to @doktor83
7 x Vega 64 Rig 10480 K/H Heavy
https://picload.org/view/dorrloli/srb.jpg.html
again a gmail send mail to my self support on miner reboot would be great !
7 x Vega 64 Rig 10480 K/H Heavy
https://picload.org/view/dorrloli/srb.jpg.html
again a gmail send mail to my self support on miner reboot would be great !
April 24, 2018, 08:20:12 AM
my ASUS STRIX rx570 4gb cards, wouldn't go more than I=29, hashing at 500~600 H/s, no matter what clock and memory settings I put in AB. what can be the problem?
at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
Contact Mattthev, he'll sort you out with some great memory straps to flash your GPUs with in case you haven't got decent ones.at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
I assume you've set your intensity, worksize and amount ot threads properly?
no, how can I reach him? here?
well, for my STRIXs if I go more than I=29 rig crashes, plus if I leave it at I=0 for auto, it also makes it I=29.
as for worksize and threads, optimal I guess is w=8, and T=2 so I keep it like this
maybe try with 1 thread. W8 is ok, play with intensity.
I believe the problem is definitely not in your miner, I've tried every other miner and still, those STRIXs are hashing better with SRB
April 24, 2018, 07:47:18 AM
Someone with sapphire rx580 nitro 8gb hynix memory can reach 1000+mh/s??
of course, anyone can! 1000 mh))
even with 4GB some of my cards can. And now there are a lot of variants of cryptonight algo with very different rates, what algo exactly do you mean?
for example, cryptonight-ipbc my 580 8gb can do 2200 h/s.
at heavy it can do 1150 h/s, but 580 4gb can only 750h/s.
Someone with sapphire rx580 nitro 8gb hynix memory can reach 1000+mh/s??
of course, anyone can! 1000 mh))
even with 4GB some of my cards can. And now there are a lot of variants of cryptonight algo with very different rates, what algo exactly do you mean?
for example, cryptonight-ipbc my 580 8gb can do 2200 h/s.
at heavy it can do 1150 h/s, but 580 4gb can only 750h/s.
Im mining monero (cryptonightv7), with rx580 8gb pulse, hynix memory reach easy with same memory straps +1000mh/s, but with rx580 8gb nitro i cant
You probably have the MJR type memory, that one is a pain
Having trouble with it myself.
April 24, 2018, 07:31:39 AM
my ASUS STRIX rx570 4gb cards, wouldn't go more than I=29, hashing at 500~600 H/s, no matter what clock and memory settings I put in AB. what can be the problem?
at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
Contact Mattthev, he'll sort you out with some great memory straps to flash your GPUs with in case you haven't got decent ones.at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
I assume you've set your intensity, worksize and amount ot threads properly?
no, how can I reach him? here?
well, for my STRIXs if I go more than I=29 rig crashes, plus if I leave it at I=0 for auto, it also makes it I=29.
as for worksize and threads, optimal I guess is w=8, and T=2 so I keep it like this
maybe try with 1 thread. W8 is ok, play with intensity.
April 24, 2018, 07:01:28 AM
my ASUS STRIX rx570 4gb cards, wouldn't go more than I=29, hashing at 500~600 H/s, no matter what clock and memory settings I put in AB. what can be the problem?
at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
Contact Mattthev, he'll sort you out with some great memory straps to flash your GPUs with in case you haven't got decent ones.at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
I assume you've set your intensity, worksize and amount ot threads properly?
no, how can I reach him? here?
well, for my STRIXs if I go more than I=29 rig crashes, plus if I leave it at I=0 for auto, it also makes it I=29.
as for worksize and threads, optimal I guess is w=8, and T=2 so I keep it like this
April 24, 2018, 06:53:59 AM
hello guys how are you alll
i would like to ask about OC\CC for 480\580 8gb Samsung memory
normalv7 would anyone suggest some
i would like to ask about OC\CC for 480\580 8gb Samsung memory
normalv7 would anyone suggest some
Have the following situation with rx580 nitro+ SE (samsung) ... CC 1280Mhz, MC 2000Mhz
... I guess "eth bios" ...
cryptonight heavy 1100-1130 h/s
cryptonight normal 1050-1100 h/s
April 24, 2018, 06:48:47 AM
my ASUS STRIX rx570 4gb cards, wouldn't go more than I=29, hashing at 500~600 H/s, no matter what clock and memory settings I put in AB. what can be the problem?
at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
Contact Mattthev, he'll sort you out with some great memory straps to flash your GPUs with in case you haven't got decent ones.at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
I assume you've set your intensity, worksize and amount ot threads properly?
April 24, 2018, 05:28:32 AM
Excuse me, if I want to update to new version, could i only copy SRBminer-CN. exe to a folder?
or have to copy all .dll files too.
Thank you.
or have to copy all .dll files too.
Thank you.
April 24, 2018, 03:48:29 AM
hello guys how are you alll
i would like to ask about OC\CC for 480\580 8gb Samsung memory
normalv7 would anyone suggest some
i would like to ask about OC\CC for 480\580 8gb Samsung memory
normalv7 would anyone suggest some
April 24, 2018, 02:34:30 AM
my ASUS STRIX rx570 4gb cards, wouldn't go more than I=29, hashing at 500~600 H/s, no matter what clock and memory settings I put in AB. what can be the problem?
at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
at the same time, some of my RX470 8gb nitro+ are hashing at I=50 and 850-950H/s on one rig, and I=41 and 750-800H/s on the other..
April 24, 2018, 02:02:53 AM
Very bad: Vega 64 Cryptonight V7
It looks like you are using default config.txt
Cast XMR automatically configures for you. For SRB, you need to change the intensity, worksize, and thread number until you find the ideal one.
Changed but not good
.https://www.upload.ee/image/8363620/CNv7.PNG
... looks good to me
April 24, 2018, 01:10:59 AM
I think there is a bug with this software.
I'm testing Monero with a RX 580 4GB & another 580 with 8 GB
With the 4 GB all is fine:
The H/s are OK, HWInfo shows memory used is 3931 MB with "intensity" : 61, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, with it I get the best H/s
With the 8 GB I get:
I=63 memory used 4073 MB - I=64 used 41 MB !!!
Increasing intensity memory increases too up to 3761 MB at I=122 (not tested higher), H/s is just a little better than using I=61
With high I values when I press H sometimes I get H/s = nan or half of the expected rate but the 5 & 30 minutes average is OK
The hash rate fluctuates some when I higher than 63, about 100 H/s difference while the 4 GB card just moves +- 1 H/s in all tests
I understand the intensity is the memory used, if it is not please could someone explain me what is happening?
Thank you & congratulations for this master piece of mining software.
I'm testing Monero with a RX 580 4GB & another 580 with 8 GB
With the 4 GB all is fine:
The H/s are OK, HWInfo shows memory used is 3931 MB with "intensity" : 61, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, with it I get the best H/s
With the 8 GB I get:
I=63 memory used 4073 MB - I=64 used 41 MB !!!
Increasing intensity memory increases too up to 3761 MB at I=122 (not tested higher), H/s is just a little better than using I=61
With high I values when I press H sometimes I get H/s = nan or half of the expected rate but the 5 & 30 minutes average is OK
The hash rate fluctuates some when I higher than 63, about 100 H/s difference while the 4 GB card just moves +- 1 H/s in all tests
I understand the intensity is the memory used, if it is not please could someone explain me what is happening?
Thank you & congratulations for this master piece of mining software.
April 24, 2018, 12:50:37 AM
Very bad: Vega 64 Cryptonight V7
[2018-04-23 23:25:53] Pool accepted result 0x000059B4
[2018-04-23 23:25:55] Pool accepted result 0x000044B1
[2018-04-23 23:25:55] Pool difficulty: 50625
[2018-04-23 23:25:55] Pool sent a new job (ID: 119620357058010)
[2018-04-23 23:25:58] Pool accepted result 0x0000EC14
[2018-04-23 23:26:03] Pool sent a new job (ID: 133028621855191)
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU0: 1494.0 H/S [T: 51c, RPM: 3446, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU1: 1493.0 H/S [T: 51c, RPM: 3772, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU2: 1498.0 H/S [T: 48c, RPM: 3253, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU3: 1493.0 H/S [T: 47c, RPM: 3544, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU4: 1492.0 H/S [T: 47c, RPM: 3535, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU5: 1484.0 H/S [T: 48c, RPM: 3373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] Total: 8954.0 H/S
[2018-04-23 23:26:12] Pool sent a new job (ID: 264038743241690)
[2018-04-23 23:26:13] Pool accepted result 0x0000CEB1
[2018-04-23 23:26:16] Pool accepted result 0x000102BE
[2018-04-23 23:26:21] Pool accepted result 0x0000B950
[2018-04-23 23:26:24] Pool difficulty: 75939
[2018-04-23 23:25:53] Pool accepted result 0x000059B4
[2018-04-23 23:25:55] Pool accepted result 0x000044B1
[2018-04-23 23:25:55] Pool difficulty: 50625
[2018-04-23 23:25:55] Pool sent a new job (ID: 119620357058010)
[2018-04-23 23:25:58] Pool accepted result 0x0000EC14
[2018-04-23 23:26:03] Pool sent a new job (ID: 133028621855191)
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU0: 1494.0 H/S [T: 51c, RPM: 3446, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU1: 1493.0 H/S [T: 51c, RPM: 3772, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU2: 1498.0 H/S [T: 48c, RPM: 3253, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU3: 1493.0 H/S [T: 47c, RPM: 3544, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU4: 1492.0 H/S [T: 47c, RPM: 3535, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] GPU5: 1484.0 H/S [T: 48c, RPM: 3373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz]
[2018-04-23 23:26:11] Total: 8954.0 H/S
[2018-04-23 23:26:12] Pool sent a new job (ID: 264038743241690)
[2018-04-23 23:26:13] Pool accepted result 0x0000CEB1
[2018-04-23 23:26:16] Pool accepted result 0x000102BE
[2018-04-23 23:26:21] Pool accepted result 0x0000B950
[2018-04-23 23:26:24] Pool difficulty: 75939
its not the miner your config/ clocking / volting settings sucks for 100%
Using OverDriveNTool:
[Profile_0]
Name=Vega64
GPU_P0=852;900;0
GPU_P1=991;900;0
GPU_P2=1084;900;0
GPU_P3=1138;900;0
GPU_P4=1150;900;0
GPU_P5=1202;900;0
GPU_P6=1212;905;0
GPU_P7=1408;925
Mem_P0=167;900;0
Mem_P1=500;900;0
Mem_P2=800;900;0
Mem_P3=1100;905
Fan_Min=3000
Fan_Max=4900
Fan_Target=65
Fan_Acoustic=1500
Power_Temp=70
Power_Target=-25
And PowerPlay:
_1100MHz_HBM_905mv
Wrong
Because using Cast XMR -->2055H/s
It looks like you are using default config.txt
Cast XMR automatically configures for you. For SRB, you need to change the intensity, worksize, and thread number until you find the ideal one.
Changed but not good
. April 24, 2018, 12:48:13 AM
I DO RECOMMEND this miner , cause I was using cast-xmr and it was showing better hashrate , but my average on the pool was low 17500-18000.
Then i started using your miner and it is showing less hashrate may be 5% , BUT my average hashrate started growing and now after 24 hours it is 19955 and is stable . Keep the good work boys!!!!!!!!!!!!! And guys don`t get fooled by the better hash of other miners it is not real obviosly!!!
Then i started using your miner and it is showing less hashrate may be 5% , BUT my average hashrate started growing and now after 24 hours it is 19955 and is stable . Keep the good work boys!!!!!!!!!!!!! And guys don`t get fooled by the better hash of other miners it is not real obviosly!!!
Thank you man, really appreciate the good words !!
SRBMiner support json report stats. Please answer because i'm want Development UI Control for SRBMiner
Thanks
There's no API yet, but soon will be
{
"total_hash_rate": 12130137,
"total_hash_rate_avg": 12108893,
"pool": {
"server": "Pool",
"status": "connected",
"online": 40528,
"offline": 0,
"reconnects": 0,
"time_connected": "2018-04-24 00:30:39",
"time_disconnected": "2018-04-24 00:30:38"
},
"job": {
"job_number": 340,
"difficulty": 100001,
"running": 87,
"job_time_avg": 119.29
},
"shares": {
"num_accepted": 4846,
"num_rejected": 0,
"num_invalid": 0,
"num_network_fail": 0,
"num_outdated": 0,
"search_time_avg": 8.36
},
"devices": [
{
"device": "GPU0",
"device_id": 0,
"hash_rate": 2022769,
"hash_rate_avg": 2017503,
"gpu_temperature": 52,
"gpu_fan_rpm": 3367
},
{
"device": "GPU1",
"device_id": 1,
"hash_rate": 2017627,
"hash_rate_avg": 2016572,
"gpu_temperature": 52,
"gpu_fan_rpm": 3349
},
{
"device": "GPU2",
"device_id": 2,
"hash_rate": 2027593,
"hash_rate_avg": 2024861,
"gpu_temperature": 55,
"gpu_fan_rpm": 3393
},
{
"device": "GPU3",
"device_id": 3,
"hash_rate": 2022426,
"hash_rate_avg": 2018533,
"gpu_temperature": 51,
"gpu_fan_rpm": 3321
},
{
"device": "GPU4",
"device_id": 4,
"hash_rate": 2024145,
"hash_rate_avg": 2018484,
"gpu_temperature": 52,
"gpu_fan_rpm": 3233
},
{
"device": "GPU5",
"device_id": 5,
"hash_rate": 2015577,
"hash_rate_avg": 2012940,
"gpu_temperature": 58,
"gpu_fan_rpm": 3395
}
]
}
Thanks
April 23, 2018, 10:11:50 PM
I don't know if this helps for optimizing miners, but I'll post it.
VLIW5 (5xxx) vs VLIW4 (6xxx) vs GCN (7xxx) ALU/SIMD comparison:
https://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/video/pcw/docs/508/791/p06.pdf
https://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/video/pcw/docs/606/220/p1.pdf
VLIW5 (5xxx) vs VLIW4 (6xxx) vs GCN (7xxx) ALU/SIMD comparison:
https://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/video/pcw/docs/508/791/p06.pdf
https://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/video/pcw/docs/606/220/p1.pdf
April 23, 2018, 09:11:16 PM
doktor83,
I've been using your miner for a while now and i really enjoy using it. But recently my hashrate is going down from 5200 to 4900 after like every 2 days or something. So when that happens, i have to restart my rig and after that it becomes normal. What do you think about this one? The version was 1.3.0.
I've been using your miner for a while now and i really enjoy using it. But recently my hashrate is going down from 5200 to 4900 after like every 2 days or something. So when that happens, i have to restart my rig and after that it becomes normal. What do you think about this one? The version was 1.3.0.
Which algo and gpu's ? Vega's ?
It is 5 MSI Armor Rx580 4gb and 1 gigabyte gaming Rx580 4gb. Algo is Cryptonightv7.
April 23, 2018, 06:27:49 PM
doctor, did you plan to add adl support for Pitcairn like GCN1.0 GPU's? Did you plan to add clock, voltage, fans and pw controls?
Often recieve rejected shares "Job not found" on nicehash cryptonightV7.
Often recieve rejected shares "Job not found" on nicehash cryptonightV7.
Not at the moment, OverdriveNEXT supported cards only. That's a whole bunch of cards starting from 290 to Vega.
And another one: i think that's good to add parameter for minrigspeed. If speed 5 minutess less than that parameter - restart rig.
In 1.4.7 how to set target and shutdown temperatures individual for each card?
To be honest i implemented clocks and voltage settings but its not working as it should, i need more time to figure out what's wrong.
By pw control you mean power limit setting ?
not a bad idea for the restart if speed < 5 minutes.
target and shutdown temperatures are global , not per card. Shutdown temperature shuts down rig, if the entered temperature is reached.
Shutdown temperature global - agreed. But target temperature must be possibility to set each GPU separately, because of different temperature conditions on one ring (some in box, some via risers).
April 23, 2018, 06:20:36 PM
anyone have the amd 390 cards?
April 23, 2018, 05:27:39 PM
I DO RECOMMEND this miner , cause I was using cast-xmr and it was showing better hashrate , but my average on the pool was low 17500-18000.
Then i started using your miner and it is showing less hashrate may be 5% , BUT my average hashrate started growing and now after 24 hours it is 19955 and is stable . Keep the good work boys!!!!!!!!!!!!! And guys don`t get fooled by the better hash of other miners it is not real obviosly!!!
Then i started using your miner and it is showing less hashrate may be 5% , BUT my average hashrate started growing and now after 24 hours it is 19955 and is stable . Keep the good work boys!!!!!!!!!!!!! And guys don`t get fooled by the better hash of other miners it is not real obviosly!!!
Thank you man, really appreciate the good words !!
SRBMiner support json report stats. Please answer because i'm want Development UI Control for SRBMiner
Thanks
There's no API yet, but soon will be
April 23, 2018, 05:02:43 PM
1.4.8 
Jump to: