I mean for good report.
They always have.
Topic: Stake.com (SteveStake) is encouraging spam. - page 4. (Read 5706 times)
@StephenJH - see you in two weeks 
That means moderators are banning for spam post also I mean for good report. Idea is not bad to prevent spammers 
However, I think reporter's hard work will be worthy now.
No, it wasn't. I have reported lot of post from single user previously but they were not banned.
17 good reports against StephenJH on May 7th and they've logged on, but haven't made any new posts.
StephenJH came back on May 15th, spammed another 12 posts (all good reports) and now this shows on their profile:
Quote
Banned from displaying signatures until June 01, 2019, 03:57:24 PM
@StephenJH - see you in two weeks
However, I do have 35/36 good reports against Ximoandali and they're still posting, but I'm still leaning to the former getting a temp ban.
Likely he/she will not get ban for spam. I have previous experience, even reported that kind of amount report and they were mark good but user didn't got ban. So we can't expect ban for spam post.How much deleted post is necessary to have to be banned? Are there any clear rules about that?
As far as I know, there no any rules about that. Its depend on user and reported post. Its fully depend on moderators and admin they will ban or not for reported spam post. But in addition, you could add note on report page why are you thinking that users should be banned. 
I'm personally experimenting by targeting one or two posters and seeing if they get banned after they get a significant number of posts deleted. They just happen to be in the Stake campaign at the moment. I've gotten Catmurs up to 87 posts deleted so far.
Judging by https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=postsdeleted, Mods are very forgiving even after hundreds of posts have been deleted.It seems to have (mostly) worked. 43 good reports against markstivn98 on May 7 and May 9 combined and they haven't posted since May 9th. 17 good reports against StephenJH on May 7th and they've logged on, but haven't made any new posts. 89 good reports against Catmurs and they haven't made any new posts since May 7th. Either they all suddenly went from 20+ posts a day to 0 or they got a temp ban.
However, I do have 35/36 good reports against Ximoandali and they're still posting, but I'm still leaning to the former getting a temp ban.
How much deleted post is necessary to have to be banned? Are there any clear rules about that?
Also whether there is a rule for threads with lots of bump spam posts. There were threads where I report more than 90% of posts in 10 pages, and all of them are deleted but thread still exists.
I'm personally experimenting by targeting one or two posters and seeing if they get banned after they get a significant number of posts deleted. They just happen to be in the Stake campaign at the moment. I've gotten Catmurs up to 87 posts deleted so far.
Judging by https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=postsdeleted, Mods are very forgiving even after hundreds of posts have been deleted.It seems to have (mostly) worked. 43 good reports against markstivn98 on May 7 and May 9 combined and they haven't posted since May 9th. 17 good reports against StephenJH on May 7th and they've logged on, but haven't made any new posts. 89 good reports against Catmurs and they haven't made any new posts since May 7th. Either they all suddenly went from 20+ posts a day to 0 or they got a temp ban.
However, I do have 35/36 good reports against Ximoandali and they're still posting, but I'm still leaning to the former getting a temp ban.
Seems Coin-desk/alcoholboy released new version of spambot, it is currently under heavy development and will be released soon. Some inside info from spambot team :
1st probable account bot:
He probably trying to abuse the contest, the coin desk has been paid
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bl46k-7193r-2585516
Seems Coin-desk/alcoholboy released new version of spambot, it is currently under heavy development and will be released soon. Some inside info from spambot team :
"In the meantime, while fixing repetitive errors, we are proud to announce that our spambot v1.2 can highlight your gambling site"
"Anyone who can win that can win 10% discount on our old spambot v1.1 caps-free version"
What we can buy with Bitcoin depends on our country's cryptocurrency rules. America, Canada, the Philippines, Brazil People can buy many things with Bitcoin in many other countries. Bitcoin can pay the ticket, the goods, the bills What we can buy with Bitcoin depends on our country. If our country accepts Bitcoin legally and in many cases the government accepts Bitcoin, then we can buy Bitcoin products that we need.
"In the meantime, while fixing repetitive errors, we are proud to announce that our spambot v1.2 can highlight your gambling site"
To me, TRUE FLIP seems to be a safe and reliable site. There are so many exciting games that entertain the entertainment medium. Apart from entertaining as well as earning money and good ways this TRUE FLIP. I think TRUE FLIP is probably the best and fair site. There are many interesting fun features here. Here also the advantage of the Deposit Bonus for the new participants. Here also the convenience of VIP bonus and Flip bonus is provided. To me, the graphics design of TRUE FLIP has been a lot better. In everything, I think TRUE FLIP is the best.
WINDICE.io is probably one of the most popular crypto dice game sites in this period. I've already heard about WINDICE.io and I used it myself. It has some interesting features that help to increase its popularity. I liked WINDICE.io graphics but it was too late to enter WINDICE.io page. So they should work more on this. Everything else on WINDICE.io seems right to me. Here's a chance to win Jackpot and anyone who can win that can win.
"Anyone who can win that can win 10% discount on our old spambot v1.1 caps-free version"
I think primedice.com is a good gambling site. There are many interesting features here that are a great way to entertain and earn money. I think Primedice.com will become a popular gambling site in the future, and its users will grow more. I have not heard any negative comments about Primedice.com so far. And I think Primedice.com is probably a safe and reliable gambling site.
OneHash.com seemed to me a better betting site. Here are many benefits that will help give the best experience of the players. Also the interesting aspect of this site is that there is no need for registration now. Users can take part without registering here. And the features of OneHash.com, which I think are interesting, are a great way to entertain and earn money.
I'm personally experimenting by targeting one or two posters and seeing if they get banned after they get a significant number of posts deleted. They just happen to be in the Stake campaign at the moment. I've gotten Catmurs up to 87 posts deleted so far.
Judging by https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=postsdeleted, Mods are very forgiving even after hundreds of posts have been deleted. 
I too had participated 5-6 weeks in stake (earned no more than 0.0025 in 5-6 weeks). I once asked Stephen to hire a professional campaign manager here after watching this thread and the other thread by yahoo62278. I guess he thought I was looking for being a campaign manager for them. However, he didn't change his decision. Probably he didn't notice or think it as spam but the truth is some of the campaign members were/are still spamming although Stephen said spam posts will not get paid. There's some good member too. I was asking will I be able to make 0.10/per week by posting as much as needed (I was kidding), some good mates suggest me not to do that because it will be spam certainly. I think they are not spammers.
I had also promoted stake, in some of the weeks, I had posted 5-10 posts only. Most of the weeks no more than 20 posts. That's how a campaign should be run, a poster should act, a campaign manager should encourage, I believe.
I had also promoted stake, in some of the weeks, I had posted 5-10 posts only. Most of the weeks no more than 20 posts. That's how a campaign should be run, a poster should act, a campaign manager should encourage, I believe.
Edit: We do in fact warned them against spam of any kind for Bitcointalk, we also guide people to post meaningful content for Bitcointalk on telegram side and not here 
Doesn't look like your warning means anything. You can either manage the campaign properly or be rightfully ridiculed for hiring shitposters.
I also agree some do not qualify as quality members (from my opinion).
Still i am not the campaign manager, i'm just helping on informing the users on why they should keep the quality above everything else.
They have also been acknowledged that they will be banned if they keep posting spam and have their posts deleted by the MODs.
Btw some of the deleted posts are related with a topic deletion, let's not forget that.
And one more thing:
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
I'm personally experimenting by targeting one or two posters and seeing if they get banned after they get a significant number of posts deleted. They just happen to be in the Stake campaign at the moment. I've gotten Catmurs up to 87 posts deleted so far.
If your campaign is so 'reportable', maybe you should fix that.
Edit: We do in fact warned them against spam of any kind for Bitcointalk, we also guide people to post meaningful content for Bitcointalk on telegram side and not here
Doesn't look like your warning means anything. You can either manage the campaign properly or be rightfully ridiculed for hiring shitposters.
You do understand this doesn't mean everyone in that list is posting in the campaign don't you?
So, is there a list of the people officially accepted in the campaign?
I find it pretty hard to believe people are posting over +200 posts for weeks, not getting paid and still wearing that signature...
Edit: We do in fact warn against spam of any kind, we also guide people to post meaningful content but that's on telegram side and not here
You should have explained this better to them as it seems they have understood they should post meaningful content on telegram and not here
I have updated the Edit information with a more understandable explanation.
You do understand this doesn't mean everyone in that list is posting in the campaign don't you?
So, is there a list of the people officially accepted in the campaign?
I find it pretty hard to believe people are posting over +200 posts for weeks, not getting paid and still wearing that signature...
Edit: We do in fact warn against spam of any kind, we also guide people to post meaningful content but that's on telegram side and not here
You should have explained this better to them as it seems they have understood they should post meaningful content on telegram and not here
You do understand this doesn't mean everyone in that list is posting in the campaign don't you?
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
Salty much? Someone asked for a list users wearing a certain signature. I provided the list. Couldn't care less what your reasons for wearing that signature are.
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
If you really care about the "brand" perhaps you should rethink your attitude and say "thank you" to all these nice volunteers doing the job that your campaign manager should be doing.
I have already answered those questions without being salty here, in telegram and everywhere when people ask me. If you think i was salty (not even being to any specific user) maybe you wanna read my words again and interpretate as much as you want.
I just left a heads up to those who don't understand that they can actually end up with invalid conclusions / statements. This conversation is over from my side.
Edit: We do in fact warned them against spam of any kind for Bitcointalk, we also guide people to post meaningful content for Bitcointalk on telegram side and not here
You do understand this doesn't mean everyone in that list is posting in the campaign don't you?
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
Salty much? Someone asked for a list users wearing a certain signature. I provided the list. Couldn't care less what your reasons for wearing that signature are.
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
If you really care about the "brand" perhaps you should rethink your attitude and say "thank you" to all these nice volunteers doing the job that your campaign manager should be doing.
You do understand this doesn't mean everyone in that list is posting in the campaign don't you?
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
And one more thing:
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
And one more thing:
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
Have I said anything on reporting who wear the signature?
Have I said anything on reading the users' post history?
Have I said anything on who is using the signature?
So don't try to be the good moral guy, I' ve asked the list only to know who can be on the campaign since the spreadsheet is not available.
(be free to check them all if you want to contribute to the forum but I guess you will probably not)
Maybe @suchmoon can scarpe everyone who is wearing the signature and regroup them for them as did with the yobit one?
Do you mean like this? (trust scores may be out of date - let me know if that's important and I'll re-scrape; post count / length is for the last 7 days)
(...)
You do understand this doesn't mean everyone in that list is posting in the campaign don't you?
As for instance I am one of the Official Brand Manager for both Primedice and Stake and I have not changed my signature neither my profile message just because i prefer to leave that way. Take that as an example.
And one more thing:
If all of you wanna try to be the good guy and just report Stake's Signature Campaign, well you are doing it wrong, you should be reporting every campaign that is currently active at Bitcointalk since each one of them incentivate spam.
Maybe @suchmoon can scarpe everyone who is wearing the signature and regroup them for them as did with the yobit one?
Wondering to move the thread on meta or create new thread about spam of stake dot com. I just can't spend much time to find that spammers due busy on real life. Expecting there is lot of spammer on @suchmoon list. If we can provide valid examples, then may be admin would take action like yobit. I will try to find once I have free time. Jump to: