it is interesting, why steemit dont use advertising selling on steemit platform? it can interested a lot of investors. Also it will help to support sbd withou steem dump.
Didn't I already tell you they only have 60,000 active users of which less than 10,000 may be real users and not bots.
And of those 10,000 maybe less than 1,000 that are not from India or other impoverished country.
What are advertisers going to sell from that traffic?
but it can't be forked.
Why not?
What can a fork accomplish that is different from the status quo if the underlying reward system encourages all users to abuse it (or be abused by it)
and can’t be fixed as you seemed to agree more or less with @anonymint recently in some comments recorded at Steemit which I previously linked to?
I guess they could remove the downvote feature so at least it is more difficult to cause content to be censored
although busy.org already seems to not hide entire blogs due to flagging.
I suppose users still have some protections there against censorship by mods that they don’t have here,
as evident by the fact that @anonymint doesn’t post here any more (at least not with his own account) and he instead posts at Steemit.
And the masses probably don't care about this aspect.
The masses care about the site being actually used and interesting and not just sockpuppets of the whales spamming the site in order to generate rewards from voting minted from the collective money supply.
There’s very few actual users on Steem.
It is a steady supply of people who signup and quit because they can’t earn anything and there’s no real interaction going on.
In 2 years, the active usership has grown only to 60,000, but only a few 1000s or less are actual unique human users who have been on the site for a significant amount of time.
Steem is not innovating on features that could drive the masses to want to use it.
Their Dtube/Dlive video apps have no possibility of wide-scale adoption because of the hen-egg critical mass dilemma
(and because Steem’s design doesn’t pay serving nodes for the bandwidth costs):
https://medium.com/vidme/goodbye-for-now-120b40becafa
why steemit dont use advertising selling on steemit platform?
Here is why:
- Advertisers want to target specific audiences, which means a new platform that doesn’t store troves of personal user data is at a severe disadvantage relative to Facebook and Google, which combined control 60% of online ad spending in the U.S.
- Most advertisers want their ads to complement “brand-safe” content. Unfortunately this is a subjective designation, which is difficult to define and enforce. Content, therefore, must be thoroughly reviewed and moderated — an expensive prospect. As YouTube recently learned with the “adpocalypse,” even a single poorly-moderated video can result in a PR disaster and undermine advertiser trust.
- Few advertisers are willing to negotiate direct deals with platforms that don’t have enormous scale, meaning ad-revenue rates are lower for newer platforms. In turn, there’s less overall revenue to be shared with creators, which means creators are less likely to support newer platforms for a sustained period of time.