for an example if we get to 100k anytime before April of next year, we are likely going to crash fast and hard,
I disagree and your own chart suggests otherwise too!
Because if you are talking about
a repeating pattern then you should see the whole thing and where in that pattern we are. In this statement you seem to be only focusing on the "yellow" part. However, the pattern (4-year cycle or whatever you want to call it) suggests that we at the end of the trend and need that bubble (red part) to finish the whole cycle. That means reaching $100k should only be the beginning of more bigger rises not a "crash".
You must be so bullish that you didn't notice that we often crash from yellow than actually go red
.
But you are not wrong, of course, there is always a chance we go to the red zone after touching the yellow, but the point i was trying to make is that the longer we take to get to 100k the more likely we can sustain those prices, if we go to 100k in in June of 2022, we will still be in the green, far from the heat, if we do that earlier, then we enter a danger zone, and there is no guarantee that entering yellow takes us to red,
This also has to do with wether you really think the 4 year cycle is still a thing or not, also anyone who thinks the length of this cycle has to follow the previous one should already be aware that we are already taking longer than all previous cycles, which means the 69k was actually the top of the cycle as far as "length is concerned"
The way I see is that each cycles takes a lot longer to top than the previous one, if we take the last cycle length into account we have actually just passed it ( a few days ago), which means road to the end of the cycle is still pretty much a long one, so I don't agree with " we at the end of the trend and need that bubble", I think we still need AT LEAST 6-8 months to end this cycle, so when we get to that yellow area again, chances are we get a another correction rather than a follow through.
P.S. The thing I took away from this chart is my own speculation that by the end of the year or first quarter of the next year if the bubble forms it will be at $400k (top of the red part like 2017 and 2013). Roll Eyes
Sorry to tell you that the chart dimensions are a bit off in the image, the top of the red only comes at 400k in around mid June 2022, I would still take the top of this channel with a grain of salt tho, this model will have to break at one point the small number of data points in it, but hey
BTC does what
BTC does, you may never know.
You are correct to the extent that you might be suggesting that bitcoin is not likely to be too much on any kind of exact schedule... but it also seems that pooya87 criticism of your assessment of the model is quite on point regarding that you seem to be ignoring what is in the actual chart and asserting what you believe to be plausible in that BTC prices frequently get stuck at various points of the yellow.. and sure that seems to be true, except when it is not... which is shown in the chart to have had at least happened twice in the past 8 years and in 4-year increments - which is also implying that we are in such a four-year place once again in which we could have a blow off top again.. which again causes BTC prices to go into the red again.
Of course, any of us should be able to agree with you that we are not guaranteed to experience any kind of blow off top merely because it happened in 4-year increments in the past, but your presuming that it is not going to happen.. just because and then listing some opinions of yours that the 4-year cycles are over blah blah blah.. seems to be just proclaiming that you believe that from here on out there are going to be limits in UPpity (even though bitcoin has not been too good at following such limitations historically.. but sure.. this time is different.. this time is different). And, even your assertion that the red area becomes less likely when it is delayed in happening comes off as a bit of a made-up wish.. that stretches logic or even bitcoin's own historical patterns.. merely because you proclaim such limits.
Again, I am not asserting that going into the red is anywhere guaranteed, but there is also a BTC price dynamic that likely exists out there between the waring sides. Historically, it seems that we have tended to experience blow-off tops in bitcoin
because it seems to be that the bearwhales are constantly trying to keep BTC prices down as low as they can and for as long as they can, and at some point they can no longer keep king daddy down, so whether that will result in BTC prices going into the red is still to be seen.. whether our top is already in at $69k or whether we get something sub-$100k, something between $100k and $400k or something supra $400k is also to be seen.
If you look at my assignment of probabilities (including in
this posts, and links too), I am not assigning really high probabilities to supra $200k scenarios (something like 30%), but I am also NOT going to act like those supra $200k scenarios are nearly off limits or that down scenarios have overly high likelihoods when they don't seem to.. and even I am assigning higher than 50% odds that our top is no greater than $100k, yet one of your errors (if it is only one?) seems to be that you are giving hardly any odds to supra $100k scenarios... and you have pretty decently high focuses on Down.. (prepared for down, no?) so hopefully you (and some other DOWNity scenario prognosticators/believers/wisheners) are not failing/refusing to adequately and/or sufficiently prepare for UP in the event that some of those less likely UP scenarios end up happening.. just like those less likely scenarios ended up happening in 2013, in 2017, and surely a variety of other times in bitcoin's history.
We have witnessed a lot of either overly prepared for down and/or insufficiently prepared for UP peeps in bitcoin's history.. and sure some of you (or those peeps) are going to continue to make such mistakes.. and in this time around there seems to be some benefits to be prepared for outrageous including something as high as $1.5million in this cycle.. so yeah, even though I place only about a .5% chance of such $1.5 million scenario happening, it still feels like the right thing, the prudent thing, the practical thing, to do to be prepared.. just in case.
Is this the right time to gloat? or not yet? with the HFSP mantra?
By the way..... I am not even asserting that folks should not be prepared for down as well.. as long as they are also prepared for UP, including some of the outrageous UP scenarios (that may well not happen).