Pages:
Author

Topic: Summer dip?!, December price outcome? ---> JOIN and guess the price GO! - page 5. (Read 7079 times)

legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Didn't intend for my prediction to line up with PlanB. Happy to know he's been accurate so far, to the point of scary spot on price points
I haven't followed everything he posted, but from what I saw, I got the impression he was awefully quiet during the last 50% dip. And when the price went up, his prediction was back Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3408
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Six digits by December, “still in play” according to PlanB. Do you believe there’s currently a “very low” probability for  Bitcoin to do that, or should everyone be open-minded? I doubted him twice before, but he was always right. Because if Bitcoin surged to $75,000 this week, the mood and price predictions will change again. Cool

Didn't intend for my prediction to line up with PlanB. Happy to know he's been accurate so far, to the point of scary spot on price points but it might be a point too far to hope he gets the last 2 months right as well -- but since my prediction is 6 figures, I'll be very happy to celebrate the truth chart aligning perfectly with s2f(x).

Some more stumbling on Monday trading but a return to 70k in the final stretch of November will definitely be a huge step backwards for bear efforts thus far...
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823

Good luck to all from 50k to 80k as I do think 🤔 the winner is going to be in that range.


https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1459842799000555532

Quote

$98K Nov and $135K Dec prediction still in play




Six digits by December, “still in play” according to PlanB. Do you believe there’s currently a “very low” probability for  Bitcoin to do that, or should everyone be open-minded? I doubted him twice before, but he was always right. Because if Bitcoin surged to $75,000 this week, the mood and price predictions will change again. Cool
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I earn btc and I buy btc.

And I stack btc

and I sell btc.


So doing all of the above and playing safe has accomplished two things.

I never got crushed.
I made far less than I would have if I just purchased and hodled.

So I flattened risk hugely = good
But I reduced huge profits greatly.

Largely, it remains quite difficult to second guess the judgement of other folks, but I do comment on your situation Philip and suggestions of good practices and prudence fairly regularly because I do feel that there is a bit of a need to suggest that having somewhat aggressive and assertive BTC tactics remains a kind of prudent approach...    And, just ongoingly I get quite a bit agitated by what I have perceived as your historical lacking and aggression.. but you ongoingly recommend various levels of prudence that just seem to ongoingly bother me in terms of lacking...  Sure, maybe now you might realize (perhaps? perhaps?  I am not sure.) to error on the side of BTC stacking aggressiveness and assertiveness.

For sure, there is an age component that may well cause additional justification to be more aggressive.. In the USA, there are extra allowances for people over 50 years old to be able to invest more in their retirement programs  partly because we already know that there tends to be a pretty common practice of too wimpy investments into retirement packages and so frequently people in their 50s and 60s might come around to realize that they have not built up enough of a nest egg.. similar remains true with regards to what role a bitcoin investment could end up contributing...

Let's say (getting into a kind of hypothetical here) that there might be some folks who reach their 50s-ish and they might have 50% or so equity in their house.. perhaps higher since housing prices have gone up so much, and maybe they have something like a 401k plan and so maybe all together they might only have $200k.. in equity (or total investments), so a 1-10% investment in BTC would be $2k to $20k, but with that level of lackings then maybe they would end up wanting to push towards higher on the investments.  I understand that you, Philip, only came around towards being more aggressive in more recent times.. but from my perspective, you still do seem to post a lot about selling (which surely is a kind of business practicality) but still does not seem to really account very well for the idea that I have frequently attempted to share in regards to selling of BTC is not really very justified until you are over invested... that's been my view... and so once you are feeling overinvested then there is some justification in shaving some of that off.

So then back to threshold questions regarding how much is overinvested has to account for individual circumstances and age would surely be one of them...... maybe I should just stop?  Because I am thinking that even something like a $10k to $20k investment into BTC when you got started or even as late as 2015 or 2016 or even 2017 with an average cost of $1k per BTC would have put you between 10-20BTC.. and then from there over-investment might have been maintaining the 10-20BTC and then shaving off the top of that without ever going below whatever that 10-20BTC that had been established.

You can probably notice that I continue to have trouble with the way you are describing your situation.. but let's say that you concede that you completely fucked up in the accumulation of BTC department and you did not realize the extent that you fucked up until something like 2017/2018.. so then at that point, maybe we can appreciate that $10k to $20k of investment of BTC would ONLY get you something like 1.5BTC to 3.5 BTC... so at that point, you might not even want to really be engaging in any kind of meaningful sales of BTC until you reach the accumulation target and surely some guys would suggest that you should be trying to get to at or over 3.5BTC before you engage in anything beyond de-minimus selling of BTC.

Another situation for those who are ONLY starting to accumulate BTC now.. so their initial goals might not even be practically to get to 1 BTC.. because 1BTC has gotten out of reach for those folks... so they start with goals 0.21BTC or something like that.... and surely if there are possibilities to average into BTC at today's prices of $55k to $65k.. let's say $60k on average, then a BTC beginning level of accumulation might be to get to putting $10k to $20k into BTC, but that is ONLY going to get 0.167 BTC to 0.3333 BTC.. and are we going to start to feel overinvested as a newbie until either the BTC price does a 10x or maybe we continue to stack sats and get to some kind of higher meaningful amount.. which surely we might not start to consider ourselves as overinvested until we get to higher investment levels going back to an assumption of maybe having a total investment portfolio size of $200k=ish.. then maybe our BTC value would need to be quite a bit higher than our initial investment if we had put $10k to $20k into it and then if the BTC portion starts to value 25% to 50% of our overall investment holdings in all assets, then maybe at that point we would start to feel over-invested?   Yes.. people are going to come to differing determinations regarding how to decide whether they are over-invested and at what point are they justified in starting to skim off some BTC.... so even for those of you who are engaged in mining or earning BTC as a business, it seems to me that you still should be going through these kinds of calculations and being careful not to be overly selling your BTC until you might reach overinvested status.. and even then you still might want to be careful regarding that..especially when it continues to have the selling to much too soon risk... which seems to be an ongoing balancing matter and not just that some folks might have done that in the past.

***Maybe JJG might be able to snap out of judgmental/patronizing lecturing mode..?.. a batman slap to the lil selfie.. might be helpful?  perhaps? perhaps?

 Cry Cry Cry

Back to this game my 70k by may prediction in april has so far turned out to be a curse.

So I would like to see us get past it even if it is not on the day for this game to end.
Seems like we are going to get there sooner or later.. and maybe there is just a kind of desire (whether king daddy has desires) to linger so much and to cause frustration and to cause some folks to start to believe that bitcoin has upside limits.... and sure there are upside limits especially when we account for both time and price.. and so down the road, $70k-ish might end up being our floor price rather than our ceiling.. but surely so hard to consider $70k as a floor as anything other than a fantasy when we seem to be having so many seemingly ongoing difficulties getting above it..  - well over 7 months now, as you mentioned... and gosh another several months might really cause some shaking of weak hands.. hahahahahaha if that is even possible?  Good to attempt to account for a variety of possible scenarios.. even though some are more reasonable/likely than others.

Good luck to all from 50k to 80k as I do think 🤔 the winner is going to be in that range.

Personally, I still consider $55k to $80k to be a deadman's zone.. which surely means that BTC prices being above the zone would have good chances of happening.. but surely there are a quite few challenges to such framing in recent times.. and yeah could be a way to shake some more weak hands to end up popping out of deadman's zone to the downside rather than to the upside.. if that were to even be possible....

I hate to say it.. Is it even possible?  Yes it is..



But surely in terms of the game... gosh.. getting into the 2 weekstm time-frame, which surely can be difficult to be expecting too much in two weeks.. even though sometimes BTC price moves do end up happening quickly and violently.. but even the quick and violent does seem to have some limits, too...
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 4842
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
Same question…. Would anyone adjust there price range if they had a chance and why or reason?

Not a chance. Smiley

Right on schedule.

Right on schedule.
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7765
'The right to privacy matters'
Yeah, I didn't point it out to those I encountered as I was still a noob then (and will forever feel that way for some reason) but it pains me to see holders/investors inadvertently turn into traders, trying to time sells/buys, squeezing themselves for time and worry when their old strategy of simply stacking regularly regardless of price was the most time-efficient and most flexible, and most worry-free!

I definitely could never consider myself as a trader (ignoring some unhappy altcoin experiments years ago) -- I sell regularly but that's because I earn or charge in Bitcoin, and effectively I try to add to my holdings with every month's income rather than eat into it. I have little qualms about liquidating when I need the cash, for example, and last year December I had to let go a significant portion so I could fix a real-life problem, something I haven't been able to recover in the 11 months that's passed -- but this doesn't make me unhappy, and I'm still stacking it back up whatever the price action in 2021. Like you, I still know every single satoshi I sold in Dec 2020 was for profit, and whatever I had left has almost tripled in value. And whatever I buy this year should hold most of its value in coming years, and potentially be worth much more a little farther down.

Now if I were to switch to trader mode, I honestly would have lost the plot.

Yes... it is very good to highlight that trader versus investor approach to matters, and for my own situation, I have never really considered myself as a trader because my first 1.5 years I ONLY bought (and got to my BTC accumulation targets - and somewhat beyond them). So I have always considered myself as a BTC HODLer and accumulator, but at some point if you realize that you have way over accumulated, then it seems to become practical to allow for sales and even to allow for the shaving off of extra as the price goes up and to potentially use that money if the BTC price goes back down.. but if it never goes back down, then so what, you have shaved off profitable and you already have way more than enough BTC.  

By the way buwaytress, your point about too conservative or too rational does also seem to apply because there do seem to be a lot of traps that many of us longer termers have seen the new entrants fall into.  Sometimes the thoughts might be: "holy shit, not this again,"  but there are ongoing plugging BTC into categories in which it just does not fit, failure refusal to account for various currently valid BTC price prediction models, treating BTC as if it were a mature asset class (or some kind of stock or company or some other nonsense), and there might be some other similar newer entrant (and not even saying that these are dumb people) mistakes that are not coming into my head at the moment.

It 100% does seem to apply and as difficult as it may be for our minds to grasp (even mine), I REALLY like this phrase from you, which is  perhaps the biggest mistake to make: to regard Bitcoin as a mature asset class or to even attempt to categorise it into an existing class.

I earn btc and I buy btc.

And I stack btc

and I sell btc.


So doing all of the above and playing safe has accomplished two things.

I never got crushed.
I made far less than I would have if I just purchased and hodled.

So I flattened risk hugely = good
But I reduced huge profits greatly.

Back to this game my 70k by may prediction in april has so far turned out to be a curse.

So I would like to see us get past it even if it is not on the day for this game to end.

Good luck to all from 50k to 80k as I do think 🤔 the winner is going to be in that range.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3408
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Yeah, I didn't point it out to those I encountered as I was still a noob then (and will forever feel that way for some reason) but it pains me to see holders/investors inadvertently turn into traders, trying to time sells/buys, squeezing themselves for time and worry when their old strategy of simply stacking regularly regardless of price was the most time-efficient and most flexible, and most worry-free!

I definitely could never consider myself as a trader (ignoring some unhappy altcoin experiments years ago) -- I sell regularly but that's because I earn or charge in Bitcoin, and effectively I try to add to my holdings with every month's income rather than eat into it. I have little qualms about liquidating when I need the cash, for example, and last year December I had to let go a significant portion so I could fix a real-life problem, something I haven't been able to recover in the 11 months that's passed -- but this doesn't make me unhappy, and I'm still stacking it back up whatever the price action in 2021. Like you, I still know every single satoshi I sold in Dec 2020 was for profit, and whatever I had left has almost tripled in value. And whatever I buy this year should hold most of its value in coming years, and potentially be worth much more a little farther down.

Now if I were to switch to trader mode, I honestly would have lost the plot.

Yes... it is very good to highlight that trader versus investor approach to matters, and for my own situation, I have never really considered myself as a trader because my first 1.5 years I ONLY bought (and got to my BTC accumulation targets - and somewhat beyond them). So I have always considered myself as a BTC HODLer and accumulator, but at some point if you realize that you have way over accumulated, then it seems to become practical to allow for sales and even to allow for the shaving off of extra as the price goes up and to potentially use that money if the BTC price goes back down.. but if it never goes back down, then so what, you have shaved off profitable and you already have way more than enough BTC.  

By the way buwaytress, your point about too conservative or too rational does also seem to apply because there do seem to be a lot of traps that many of us longer termers have seen the new entrants fall into.  Sometimes the thoughts might be: "holy shit, not this again,"  but there are ongoing plugging BTC into categories in which it just does not fit, failure refusal to account for various currently valid BTC price prediction models, treating BTC as if it were a mature asset class (or some kind of stock or company or some other nonsense), and there might be some other similar newer entrant (and not even saying that these are dumb people) mistakes that are not coming into my head at the moment.

It 100% does seem to apply and as difficult as it may be for our minds to grasp (even mine), I REALLY like this phrase from you, which is  perhaps the biggest mistake to make: to regard Bitcoin as a mature asset class or to even attempt to categorise it into an existing class.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I wish I could talk to JayJuanGee in his mother tongue as I understand little of what he says, but I really feel he's one of those people who grab the most important topics and, both of you, talk about them for hours during windy nights of Christmas.  

Sorry to hear that we might be talking past each other from time to time.

You seem to be inventing a strawman argument here.  I put very little weight to either supercycle theories or to UP only ideas, though I do acknowledge that there have been some credible folks coming over to supercycle theories even though even they are not proclaiming the disappearance of corrections along the way.
Straw man? No. I'm just saying that you shouldn't take it for granted it'll repeat those 4-year cycles. Although, I'm of the same belief it will, there's no proof it will.

Hm?  Is this one of those occasions that we might be talking past each other?  I am not sure if I need to add anything beyond what I already said and maybe you are not saying anything that is too much different from what I am saying.   

Let's just take the $75k ceiling for this Calendar year.  If I say that there is less than a 50% chance of such ceiling existing and not being breached this calendar year..or  at least somewhere in the ballpark of a 50% chance, and you are providing higher probabilities that such ceiling will NOT be breached this Calendar year (let's say that you assert that there is a 70% chance that it will not be breached this calendar year), then are we saying anything that much different beyond that we are assigning differing probabilities?


You are generalizing a lot here, and I am not even clear about what you are saying.  Are you talking about supra $64k/$100k for this prediction game?  or for the calendar year?  or for the cycle?
No, no, I didn't take that stand. What I was trying to mean is that there are lots of people who predict and therefore lots of predictions where most of them turn out incorrect and justifiably some, correct. If you make a hundred of predictions, it is logical to assume you will be right at least once.

Sure of course some predictions are also more correct than others, and some people profit stupendously off of their actions that might be to attempt to align their acts with their predictions by having some bitcoin while others stay as no coiners or low coiners and end up continuing to be left behind either selling BTC too early, waiting for lower prices that do not happen and/or failing/refusing to sufficiently prepare for UP just in case it happens (and including assigning way the fuck too low of probabilities to UP that ends up happening in spite their supposedly sound and practical predictions). 

We have seen such failure/refusal to sufficiently and adequately prepare for UP over and over and over in bitcoin history. It has been a common theme, and I suspect that it will continue to be a decently common theme for quite a while into the future.


I can say that in my opinion you are "likely" to be wwwwwwrrrrrrrooooooonnnnnngggggg....
You can't say that my analysis is incorrect just like you can't say x + y = 3. It's not a matter of opinions unless we define our factors.

Seems that I have already sufficiently defined my factors.. including my conclusions that I have sufficiently and adequately backed up anything that I was saying or wanting to say on the topic. 

If you want to make some further assertions that's on you.

That makes little sense BlackHatCoiner.  In BTC, sometimes breakouts are to the upside and sometimes breakouts are to the downside
And yet, bitcoin has provided, averagely, 180% annual yield since the first halving. That means it gives more than it takes.  Tongue

Again?  I am not sure if I follow what you are wanting to say.  One thing is to talk about cycles and another thing is talking about being adequately prepared for either UP or DOWN, if you believe that there might be some kind of advantage in preparing for whichever way bitcoin might break out of our current price range.  Let's say for example, you want to describe our current price range of $55k to $75k, and you assert that $75k is the top of this range, at least for this calendar year, but that information (or even level of assertions regarding BTC price movements) might not be enough to act unless you would also be making some assertions regarding where the BTC price might be going in 2022 (whether we are referring to the 1st, 2nd or 3rd quarter).  I doubt that we really need to be batting this topic around anymore because I don't see where we are having any kind of major or significant disagreements beyond opinions and your beliefs that I need to back up my assertions more and surely, as I already mentioned several times, I don't agree with that.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 6415
Farewell, Leo
I wish I could talk to JayJuanGee in his mother tongue as I understand little of what he says, but I really feel he's one of those people who grab the most important topics and, both of you, talk about them for hours during windy nights of Christmas.  

You seem to be inventing a strawman argument here.  I put very little weight to either supercycle theories or to UP only ideas, though I do acknowledge that there have been some credible folks coming over to supercycle theories even though even they are not proclaiming the disappearance of corrections along the way.
Straw man? No. I'm just saying that you shouldn't take it for granted it'll repeat those 4-year cycles. Although, I'm of the same belief it will, there's no proof it will.

You are generalizing a lot here, and I am not even clear about what you are saying.  Are you talking about supra $64k/$100k for this prediction game?  or for the calendar year?  or for the cycle?
No, no, I didn't take that stand. What I was trying to mean is that there are lots of people who predict and therefore lots of predictions where most of them turn out incorrect and justifiably some, correct. If you make a hundred of predictions, it is logical to assume you will be right at least once.

I can say that in my opinion you are "likely" to be wwwwwwrrrrrrrooooooonnnnnngggggg....
You can't say that my analysis is incorrect just like you can't say x + y = 3. It's not a matter of opinions unless we define our factors.

That makes little sense BlackHatCoiner.  In BTC, sometimes breakouts are to the upside and sometimes breakouts are to the downside
And yet, bitcoin has provided, averagely, 180% annual yield since the first halving. That means it gives more than it takes.  Tongue
STT
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1411
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
At this point even with the latest tinge of negative action in the price and our pullback I really dont think my guess of 45k will deliver on the day.  Its a bit too negative, 50k or so might be in with a shot but it'd take an over correction to the downside to get 45k.   Still possible but in the red for probability in outcomes I think
  Over correction can happen but it's like pushing an empty bottle under the surface of the water, the buoyancy likely in price at that time really makes such a dip most likely to be brief.  Just the timing is off, we can decline obviously but we aren't in that area for the end of this competition.  Hopefully Im wrong and its dead on of course :p  

2 weeks and a few days left
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Anyhow, I do remain somewhat confused

I said it is very unlikely we pass 75k this year, you thought that me thinking that btc has some sort of price limits was wrong, so if 75k isnt the limit and i turn out to be wrong, we might go a lot higher levels, That will make me "richer" at the expense of being "wrong" which I'll gladly accept.

O.k.. I will concede that there is some aspect of your earlier enigma of a post (cited below) that went over my head... but jeez... kind of a puzzle, no?

yes.. you are probably wrong..

Better rich than right.

yes.. you are probably wrong..
I'm sorry, but which part of their analysis is probably wrong? Making this statement means you know an analysis that is correct.


My statement proclaiming that another statement is probably wrong is a response.  It does not necessarily mean that I have any other analysis or that I want to make any analysis further than stating that the analysis that was made is probably wrong.  By the way, I have made some posts regarding my assignment of probabilities regarding my opinion regarding various price points and in terms of timing of the top of this cycle, too.  Even though some of those posts are more than a month old, I don't see anything in the recent BTC price moves that change my opinions about probabilities, except maybe allowing for higher probabilities that this cycle will end up getting drug out past this calendar year.... Maybe I will update and tweak my numbers at some point.. here's a link for ease of reference.

Just because Bitcoin does those run-ups, it doesn't mean it'll continue doing them forever.

You seem to be inventing a strawman argument here.  I put very little weight to either supercycle theories or to UP only ideas, though I do acknowledge that there have been some credible folks coming over to supercycle theories even though even they are not proclaiming the disappearance of corrections along the way.

Also, just because there's a numerous amount of posts predicting it'll hit 100k-200k and it, indeed, reaches before the end of the year, it doesn't make mikeywith's analysis “probably wrong”.

I am not saying that either or even relying on the fact that a lot of people are saying it.  
I think that I had already asserted that $55k to $80k is likely a noman's land and that there is likely a lot of lacking of resistance in this area and that lacking of resistance could well go up to the area of sub-$100k.  I did expect that there would be resistance before $100k, but the likely lack of resistance also makes his assertion of prices not getting above $75k to be not too likely.  Of course, the fact that we have been in the noman's zone (supra $55k for 6 weeks-ish) does start to challenge the noman's land thesis.. so surely I will grant that.. even though I doubt that the noman's land thesis has been negated yet.  You can believe whatever you like regarding various bitcoin price dynamics where resistance or support levels might be.

 
The same people who predicted it'll exceed 64k are the same who think it'll exceed 100k, but how many of their predictions were right? Less than half?

You are generalizing a lot here, and I am not even clear about what you are saying.  Are you talking about supra $64k/$100k for this prediction game?  or for the calendar year?  or for the cycle?  If what you were saying were true regarding this prediction game, there would be no predictions between $64k and $100k, which truly is not the case.  Or are you saying that people who had said supra $64k at the time of the prediction game have now converted over to saying supra $100k - with the passage of time?  Does it not make sense that higher BTC prices become more likely once they reach higher prices?  I understand that there are questions of how fast the price gets there, but in the case of BTC we had a pretty much nonstop price rise from $10k-ish to $65k-ish.. in about 7 months, so yeah when we got the 56% correction down to $28,600 there might have been some justification to allow buy support to catch up before the BTC price is able to more easily move higher than $65k-ish and sure so far it has only gotten to $69k.. so surely there could be questions and or doubt about whether buy support is going to be able to keep up or continue and people are going to have different views about that. and some people will profit more than others based upon the way they choose to act upon their views.

 
I keep seeing people on Twitter making monstrous calculations for the price, but if you ever look at those a few of months later, you'll realize most of those turned out incorrect.

Well hopefully members here are not distracted too much in terms of establishing their own strategies based on all over the place assertions regarding BTC prices.  That has been true for a long time, and for sure by definition most predictions are going to be wrong the more specific they attempt to ascribe what is going to happen, and even if some kind of specific prediction ends up being correct, that does not mean that actions should have been weighted 100% based on a prediction that may have earlier had a 20% chance of being correct but when it ends up being correct that 20% then becomes 100%.. but does not even mean that the odds had been wrongly established at the earlier time before the event became true.

If anyone has followed my own BTC strategies over the years, which I would assert have been pretty damned consistent, even if I have attempted to learn along the way and tweak from time to time, I have many times proclaimed that guys need to attempt to establish their bitcoin plans/strategies in accordance with their own personal circumstances and then consider whether they are in accumulation stage, maintenance stage or liquidation stage so their personal circumstances and what stage they are in would affect their strategies... yet even after establishing strategies and reaching goals, there can be ways of deciding what to do that attempts to both take out emotions and to take out needs for short term predictions.  

After largely reaching my BTC accumulation targets in 2014 and 2015 (and even considering myself to have had over-accumulated), my own strategy has been to buy on the way down and to sell on the way up (which I largely started in late 2015 when BTC prices were around $250), and to both attempt to spread the ranges of the triggering
of the buy/sell orders, and also to error on the side of ongoingly accumulating BTC.. and largely I have never really sold much on the way up (currently less than 1% for every 15%-ish rise..even though sometimes I do make adjustments to those numbers with the passage of time based on some cashflow considerations going on in my life.. and maybe a little bit adjustments that account for certain aspects of what I believe to be short term BTC price momentum)....so in that regard, I believe that since around mid-to-late 2015, my BTC portfolio has been (and continues to be) advantaged by seemingly inevitable BTC volatility, presume that the BTC price is going up in the long run and just go with the flow regarding if the BTCprice goes down I buy and if the price goes up I sell .. so there are attempts at: 1) being emotional neutral regarding short-term BTC price moves, 2) largely not allowing predictions to affect buy/sell strategies, except maybe in very small ways (aka ongoing employment of incrementalism strategies) and 3) presuming that in the long term - and at least in 4 years cycles (if not longer) that the BTC price will be higher - even if from time to time it might take a while to work itself out - such as 2-3 years of DOWNity periods.. which we have seen at least a couple times while I have been in and even shorter periods of threatening going into longer periods of DOWNity that end up being shorter periods.

By the way, sometimes I experience some dilemmas regarding how low to keep my BTC buy orders, and currently I have buy orders that go down to $20k-ish.. and in March 2021 I was criticized for keeping buy orders down to $9k.. even though later those buy orders did end up getting removed.n  I have always attempted to project ahead regarding the amount that I sell on the way up.. so in 2015 I had projected that I would sell up to 40% or so of my BTC portfolio in the event that BTC prices went shooting up, but when push came to shove during early 2017-ish as BTC prices had already begun rising, I was ongoingly down-tweaking the quantity of my BTC sales - because I was realizing in practice my system was causing me to sell way more of my BTC than I really wanted to sell, so by the time the BTC price reached supra $19k levels in late 2017, I had realized that I had sold nearly 12% of my BTC.. so my BTC/cash allocations in my BTC portfolio were 88/12... and sure maybe that felt good when the BTC price corrected in 2018, but I still felt as if I had sold too much.. so currently, my BTC sales projections within my regular system do not cause me to sell close to as much BTC, even during considerably great exponential UPpity periods, if they were to continue to happen.

If you have been following bitcoin circles (such as this forum or some other bitcoin circles), you may well have noticed that historically there frequently have been a decent number of folks who end up failing and refusing to sufficiently and adequately prepare for UP in BTC prices.., happens over and over and over again.. so one thing is being invested in various fiat investments and another thing is being invested in bitcoin.. and having some kinds of decent long term plans.. and surely it can take a while to accumulate BTC too....

Something I am reminded of often enough, as we'se discussed in previous posts. Discounting those who exited at predetermined prices (fairplay to them, even if those targets were $10,000k) since they left and never came back and never then entered into regret and bitter mode.

But always surprised me when I was new to the scene and meeting supposed veterans who'd given up, and then only to stick around and then go into some weird game of trying to guess the top again, only to inevitably fail because they always think too "rationally" and "conservatively". They then revert to trader mentality from being holders. And it's kind of sad to see that.

Yes... it is very good to highlight that trader versus investor approach to matters, and for my own situation, I have never really considered myself as a trader because my first 1.5 years I ONLY bought (and got to my BTC accumulation targets - and somewhat beyond them). So I have always considered myself as a BTC HODLer and accumulator, but at some point if you realize that you have way over accumulated, then it seems to become practical to allow for sales and even to allow for the shaving off of extra as the price goes up and to potentially use that money if the BTC price goes back down.. but if it never goes back down, then so what, you have shaved off profitable and you already have way more than enough BTC.  

For example, for ease of calculation, imagine an average cost of BTC of $1k, and so when the BTC price goes up to $20k, then you are 20x in profits, but when the BTC price crashes down to $3k/$4k, you are ONLY 3x/4x in profits.
 So yeah, you might be a bit reluctant to shave any BTC off at 3x/4x profits, but you might not give too many shits - however, when the BTC price goes to $69k and maybe drops to $28k, yeah your profits are moving around between 28x and 69x, so sure you might try to strategize somewhat in shaving off some profits, but largely you are not likely to give too many shits if you happen to need to buy something that is with 28x profits rather than waiting it out for higher levels of profits.. and surely you may also just have extra cash that has already been shaven off along the way up from $3k up to $69k, so it is not like you are cash starved and having to sell BTC at a time that is anything other than your own choosing even if they BTC prices happen to "ONLY" be in 28x profits rather than 69x profits.

By the way buwaytress, your point about too conservative or too rational does also seem to apply because there do seem to be a lot of traps that many of us longer termers have seen the new entrants fall into.  Sometimes the thoughts might be: "holy shit, not this again,"  but there are ongoing plugging BTC into categories in which it just does not fit, failure refusal to account for various currently valid BTC price prediction models, treating BTC as if it were a mature asset class (or some kind of stock or company or some other nonsense), and there might be some other similar newer entrant (and not even saying that these are dumb people) mistakes that are not coming into my head at the moment.

I understand what you are saying, but JayJuanGee is a man that is more posting in the wall observer thread, the reason for more optimism about bitcoin price. I wish I can be like that. But I am a type that is waiting for dump so that I can buy the dip Grin. I hope you will get me righta about this.

Of course there are people who are more into fundamental analysis and others more into technical analysis and surely a variety of ways to figure out how much weight to give to the varying ways of attempting to figure out short-term price direction in order that you can attempt to profit from it.

I never try to blame people for their actual status because for sure there are guys who are either just coming into BTC or they have issues with their cashflow so that it takes a whole hell of a long time to be able to get a kind of sufficient stake in BTC in order to feel that you have either reached your accumulation goals or that you have at least had enough time to accumulate and prepare for UP.  

Once you have either reached accumulation targets or gotten to a feeling that you are somewhat close then likely you will discontinue being concerned about whether the BTC price drops or not because any extra BTC accumulation starts to feel like icing on the cake and/or extra rather than your feelings that you have not yet come close to reaching your BTC accumulation goals.

JayJuanGee is just one of the people on this forum that is more optimistic about bitcoin price, and to me his analysis is right, the analysis that has been right from long time till now.
Just to clarify; I'm also bullish on bitcoin and I don't think it'll be $75k by the end of the year (and maybe a little from January), but lots more. I'm just saying that due to pure speculation, you can't say that someone's analysis is correct or incorrect. Based on which factors do we examine that an analysis is right?


I think that you can.

I can say that in my opinion you are "likely" to be wwwwwwrrrrrrrooooooonnnnnngggggg....



what is so bad about that?  If you say that "your opinion" needs to be backed up more, then sure you are not persuaded, but does not necessarily mean that there is any further need to back up either an opinion or an assertion that some other analysis is likely wrong.. sure you might buy into the other analysis because it is more backed up than the opinion, but the analysis still could have high odds of being wrong, even if it is backed up by maths, science, facts, logic and whatever other mumbo jumbo that you want to throw in there.

By the way, I had already asserted that I had lauded mikeywith for his discussion of his chart and his analysis even while saying that I believe that he is likely wrong... I doubt that I need to do more.. even though I did provide some additional discussion already.


I wish I can be like that.
I wish I wouldn't. It's overrated. You keep waiting for a crazy spike that lasts few hours for months!  Tongue

Many peeps have that same problem.. It can be difficult to take your eyes off of the charts - especially when you keep expecting something to happen (that may or may not end up happening, as you rightly point out BlackHatCoiner.

Short term bitcoin prediction can be inaccurate, even analysts are predicting it wrong with their professional analyses, but no one is wrong about the long term all-time-high prediction.
I see it like this: The more you wait, the less the odds to not go upwards. Professional, non-professional — it works!

That makes little sense BlackHatCoiner.  In BTC, sometimes breakouts are to the upside and sometimes breakouts are to the downside, and if we are in a bull market (which is likely to be the case right now), then the odds for breaking out to the upside are greater than the odds for breaking out to the downside.  Sure we might not be in a bull market.. and we might not even know if we are in a bull or a bear market until looking at the matter a few years down the road.  Of course, part of the justification or background for differing assessments regarding where the BTC price is going is to project whether we might be in a bull market or a bear market, and surely people do not always get those projections right, and surely some people make their preparations so that they are going to be able to profit whether they are right or not.  Of course, there are a lot of variations in between regarding how people use these kinds of frameworks and the extent that they are ready, willing or able to act upon their assessments/projections of the frameworks.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 6415
Farewell, Leo
JayJuanGee is just one of the people on this forum that is more optimistic about bitcoin price, and to me his analysis is right, the analysis that has been right from long time till now.
Just to clarify; I'm also bullish on bitcoin and I don't think it'll be $75k by the end of the year (and maybe a little from January), but lots more. I'm just saying that due to pure speculation, you can't say that someone's analysis is correct or incorrect. Based on which factors do we examine that an analysis is right?

I wish I can be like that.
I wish I wouldn't. It's overrated. You keep waiting for a crazy spike that lasts few hours for months!  Tongue

Short term bitcoin prediction can be inaccurate, even analysts are predicting it wrong with their professional analyses, but no one is wrong about the long term all-time-high prediction.
I see it like this: The more you wait, the less the odds to not go upwards. Professional, non-professional — it works!
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 4795
Richie status likely takes a while to get to and surely there are a variety of ways to preserve such status once getting there.. I have some difficulties imagining that richie or not richie status depends on a short to medium term prediction, unless you might be a gambler.. and then hopefully you are correct.
Some people will prefer the short term because they want to gain more, but losses are the results for many, so it can be said it is more of gambling. But, yet, there are few people that prefer to go for short term and make something from it. But people that lost most are traders, especially those that leverage, some people can be professional to the extent it is no more gambling for them, but does not change the fact that most people that are losing are these kind of people, especially leverage traders.

I'm sorry, but which part of their analysis is probably wrong? Making this statement means you know an analysis that is correct.
I too have predicted that bitcoin price can never reach $75000 this year, but one thing about short term analysis is that no one is right and no one that predicted it correctly can say they are right because they can not always be right while predicting the price in short term. JayJuanGee is just one of the people on this forum that is more optimistic about bitcoin price, and to me his analysis is right, the analysis that has been right from long time till now. The reason is because he is not considering short term prediction, but instead in long term. With the wealth distribution in the world, we all know that bitcoin reaching $100000 and more is attainable. And to be fear enough, I like the type of people that do not consider the fall but just having a rest of mind and seeing bitcoin price growing again which increase and reach all-time-high again. This kind of analysis is the 100% accurate analysis about bitcoin price for now, the fiat inflationary governmental control makes it more possible in addition to increasing bitcoin adoption.

I understand what you are saying, but JayJuanGee is a man that is more posting in the wall observer thread, the reason for more optimism about bitcoin price. I wish I can be like that. But I am a type that is waiting for dump so that I can buy the dip Grin. I hope you will get me righta about this.

Short term bitcoin prediction can be inaccurate, even analysts are predicting it wrong with their professional analyses, but no one is wrong about the long term all-time-high prediction.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3408
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
If you have been following bitcoin circles (such as this forum or some other bitcoin circles), you may well have noticed that historically there frequently have been a decent number of folks who end up failing and refusing to sufficiently and adequately prepare for UP in BTC prices.., happens over and over and over again.. so one thing is being invested in various fiat investments and another thing is being invested in bitcoin.. and having some kinds of decent long term plans.. and surely it can take a while to accumulate BTC too....

Something I am reminded of often enough, as we'se discussed in previous posts. Discounting those who exited at predetermined prices (fairplay to them, even if those targets were $10,000k) since they left and never came back and never then entered into regret and bitter mode.

But always surprised me when I was new to the scene and meeting supposed veterans who'd given up, and then only to stick around and then go into some weird game of trying to guess the top again, only to inevitably fail because they always think too "rationally" and "conservatively". They then revert to trader mentality from being holders. And it's kind of sad to see that.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 6415
Farewell, Leo
yes.. you are probably wrong..
I'm sorry, but which part of their analysis is probably wrong? Making this statement means you know an analysis that is correct. Just because Bitcoin does those run-ups, it doesn't mean it'll continue doing them forever. Also, just because there's a numerous amount of posts predicting it'll hit 100k-200k and it, indeed, reaches before the end of the year, it doesn't make mikeywith's analysis “probably wrong”.

The same people who predicted it'll exceed 64k are the same who think it'll exceed 100k, but how many of their predictions were right? Less than half? I keep seeing people on Twitter making monstrous calculations for the price, but if you ever look at those a few of months later, you'll realize most of those turned out incorrect.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 6279
be constructive or S.T.F.U
Anyhow, I do remain somewhat confused

I said it is very unlikely we pass 75k this year, you thought that me thinking that btc has some sort of price limits was wrong, so if 75k isnt the limit and i turn out to be wrong, we might go a lot higher levels, That will make me "richer" at the expense of being "wrong" which I'll gladly accept.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
yes.. you are probably wrong..

Better rich than right.

I am not clear regarding how you would conclude that my assertions would suggest that your BTC price prediction for the rest of this calendar year (even presuming that you might end up being correct) would lead to more richieness than some other approach, including my skepticisms about your asserted views.  

Richie status likely takes a while to get to and surely there are a variety of ways to preserve such status once getting there.. I have some difficulties imagining that richie or not richie status depends on a short to medium term prediction, unless you might be a gambler.. and then hopefully you are correct.  

If you have been following bitcoin circles (such as this forum or some other bitcoin circles), you may well have noticed that historically there frequently have been a decent number of folks who end up failing and refusing to sufficiently and adequately prepare for UP in BTC prices.., happens over and over and over again.. so one thing is being invested in various fiat investments and another thing is being invested in bitcoin.. and having some kinds of decent long term plans.. and surely it can take a while to accumulate BTC too....

Anyhow.. and many times those kinds of folks who fail/refuse to prepare for UP end up getting left behind by either selling too much BTC too early, failing/refusing to engage in an ongoing buying/accumulating of BTC or taking other actions that insufficiently and/or inadequately prepare them for UP.  

Some of them end up bitter by their various failures and refusals to sufficiently/adequately prepare for UP.  

I cannot recall ever suggested that people ONLY prepare for UP (from my point of view, that would be a kind of gambling, and from my point of view, investing in bitcoin and deploying various BTC accumulation/HODL strategies should not be gambling - because there are needs to allocate and adequately prepare for risks.. which frequently would mean employing various means of incremental accumulation of BTC such as DCA, buying on dips and lump sum investing.. at least until reaching self-established accumulation goals).  

Furthermore, I have frequently found myself reminding folks to make sure that they are prepared for both UP and DOWN.. and some of those kinds of reminders are especially applicable for those who seem to be largely asserting that they are overweighted in preparing for DOWN such as waiting to buy BTC, selling BTC early and other actions that seem to NOT adequately/sufficiently prepare them for UP.  

Anyhow, I do remain somewhat confused about how you are supposedly going to get rich or preserve some kind of richie status by acting upon some speculations that BTC is NOT going above $75k for this calendar year - especially if you seriously and adequately consider that there are decent odds that you would NOT end up being correct regarding your presumption of such a $75k-ish ceiling (or your not gonna happen proclamation).
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 6279
be constructive or S.T.F.U
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
mikeywith - can you tell me where to generate this chart?

TradingView, search for BLX which has the longest data on BTC/USD, the timeframe used here is 2 weeks, and the rest is just the drawing tools which are available for free on Tradingview.

Thanks for reminding me about this, might be a good time to update it.




Again, as before, the yellow and red areas are levels that usually Bitcoin doesn't spend a lot of time at, every time it goes there, it's either prior to a blow-off top before a crash or a crash before anything else.

I have divided the lower bound into two parts, dark green and light green, the light green is areas where bitcoin usually bottoms after a bear market or a large correction, you can also see that despite the fact that we made a new ATH this month, we didn't go past the green area unlike the previous ATH in march, which means we still have more room to grow, which also proves that the slower we move up the more we can sustain the price, for an example if we get to 100k anytime before April of next year, we are likely going to crash fast and hard, if we go to a 100k in say June of next year we will still be in the green with more room to the upside.

The bottom of the light green channel sits at roughly 19.5k, which means it's almost nearly impossible to ever see 19.5k regardless of when the bear market starts, the upper bound of the dark green on Dec 30 sits at 75k, which means we are highly unlikely going to pass 75k this year, a very sad opinion, but well, I hope I am wrong.

Hahahaha

yes.. you are probably wrong.. but I still like your discussion of the chart and your analysis regarding why you believe the BTC price to have some kind of seemingly self-imposed limitations in how much it is likely to go up in the upcoming 6 weeks-ish...

It's almost as if you had never experienced any previous "surprise" BTC run-ups.. but hey... you do you... surely, you are entitled to your own perceptions regarding the potentials of our saviour king daddy.   Wink
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 6279
be constructive or S.T.F.U
mikeywith - can you tell me where to generate this chart?

TradingView, search for BLX which has the longest data on BTC/USD, the timeframe used here is 2 weeks, and the rest is just the drawing tools which are available for free on Tradingview.

Thanks for reminding me about this, might be a good time to update it.




Again, as before, the yellow and red areas are levels that usually Bitcoin doesn't spend a lot of time at, every time it goes there, it's either prior to a blow-off top before a crash or a crash before anything else.

I have divided the lower bound into two parts, dark green and light green, the light green is areas where bitcoin usually bottoms after a bear market or a large correction, you can also see that despite the fact that we made a new ATH this month, we didn't go past the green area unlike the previous ATH in march, which means we still have more room to grow, which also proves that the slower we move up the more we can sustain the price, for an example if we get to 100k anytime before April of next year, we are likely going to crash fast and hard, if we go to a 100k in say June of next year we will still be in the green with more room to the upside.

The bottom of the light green channel sits at roughly 19.5k, which means it's almost nearly impossible to ever see 19.5k regardless of when the bear market starts, the upper bound of the dark green on Dec 30 sits at 75k, which means we are highly unlikely going to pass 75k this year, a very sad opinion, but well, I hope I am wrong.
Pages:
Jump to: