Adjust that to 450 from 400 and things change radically (and the way KnC are talking we could be seeing closer to 500). That's looking like it may be the real picture. I'd say although you may need the money you'd be wise to think hard about jumping ship when exchange rates and hash rate of the rigs could rise and the projected difficulty shown on that calculator are so pessimistic long term (see many wise posts about the unlikelyhood of it rising so much ).
We're always exposed to difficulty risks, it's a risky game to play. Even buying BTC could wipe you out. That's why the rewards can be so good.
We're always exposed to difficulty risks, it's a risky game to play. Even buying BTC could wipe you out. That's why the rewards can be so good.
KNC wrote: "greater than 30% performance increase " that is more than 520 for a jupiter.
It's strange to me that this announcement was almost completely ignored here!
Performance of CGMiner doesn't necessarily translate into more GH/s. It could be related to how hard the internal Linux controller has to work running CGMiner. This doesn't necessarily mean that it results in more GH/s from the system. Also, if it does, this may have been why it went up to 400 GH/s in the first place.
I have posted on this thread only a couple of times and each time, you jump all over me for no reason at all. If they meant the performance was going to increase to 520, don't you think they would have said that? While that may yet happen, that wasn't the announcement.
