Pages:
Author

Topic: [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] - page 19. (Read 39830 times)

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
June 04, 2013, 04:20:37 PM
I pity the person who sold 1000 TAT.VM shares at 0.0007 instead of 0.007 by mistake on bf .That's what created an interesting V in the chart.

hehe yeah i shaw and was like whaaaat?

Yeah, if you go to Bitfunder you can see there's almost always some asshole who's got an offer of 1000 or 10,000 or something for the same price as the IPO with the a zero or two extra after the decimal, trying to catch people slipping.  I guess it worked this time...

Still, I think it's an asshole thing to do.  Everyone on Bitfunder could be doing that, this guy isn't clever, just a dick.

The free market is so free that it sometimes goes commando.

Lol seen that happen before too on other stocks makes interesting trendlines XD
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
June 04, 2013, 04:08:23 PM
I pity the person who sold 1000 TAT.VM shares at 0.0007 instead of 0.007 by mistake on bf .That's what created an interesting V in the chart.

hehe yeah i shaw and was like whaaaat?

Yeah, if you go to Bitfunder you can see there's almost always some asshole who's got an offer of 1000 or 10,000 or something for the same price as the IPO with the a zero or two extra after the decimal, trying to catch people slipping.  I guess it worked this time...

Still, I think it's an asshole thing to do.  Everyone on Bitfunder could be doing that, this guy isn't clever, just a dick.

The free market is so free that it sometimes goes commando.
jr. member
Activity: 52
Merit: 12
June 04, 2013, 04:02:13 PM
I pity the person who sold 1000 TAT.VM shares at 0.0007 instead of 0.007 by mistake on bf .That's what created an interesting V in the chart.

hehe yeah i shaw and was like whaaaat?

Yeah, if you go to Bitfunder you can see there's almost always some asshole who's got an offer of 1000 or 10,000 or something for the same price as the IPO with the a zero or two extra after the decimal, trying to catch people slipping.  I guess it worked this time...

Still, I think it's an asshole thing to do.  Everyone on Bitfunder could be doing that, this guy isn't clever, just a dick.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
June 04, 2013, 02:59:01 PM
Oh pa gambling style.......hei~~~sexy lady~~~~~~~

if the difficulties triple in one months, this will be a reasonable way to get money from issues a PMB...I think this could be happen we know ASICMINER going to deploy their 200TH.....and  100TH....AMC......even BTCGarden are on the way to jumping !!!......avalon chips shipping worldwide already.....BFL may start their shipments....
This just are gambling based on does he made right prediction of the market...just it!!!

for everyone holding PMB contracts...once there are better PMB in the market...then it will largely affecting the demand of TAT.VB !!! Holders will suffering in low liquidity!!!! and this situation will forced them to selling their contracts below IPO!!!!!!!! All PMB does not have maturity time, pretty nice in short-run, in long run is just worthless....
sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
June 04, 2013, 02:10:48 PM
Lol, thanks to all panic sellers I made some easy bitcents. Tongue
How much did you buy?  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
June 04, 2013, 12:10:58 PM
and here is why "quantity of ASICMINER shares that represent an amount of hashing power that is equivalent to TAT.VIRTUALMINE’s total simulated hashing power"
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
June 04, 2013, 12:09:46 PM
Correct, I did make a mistake.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 04, 2013, 11:59:37 AM
No its for a full share.. hes buying 290 shares for 700 BTC you see..
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 255
June 04, 2013, 11:57:12 AM
errm didnt ASICMINER PT pay 0.02653753 per share this week so lets say 290 * 0.02653753 = 7.7 BTC per week?
or am i missing something?
I think the post was about the 1/100 passthrough, not a full AM share
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 11:56:12 AM


Lets say that 700 BTC - fees will buy about 290 ASICMINER shares.
290 ASICMINER will pay you about what, 72 BTC in divs per week?


errm didnt ASICMINER PT pay 0.02653753 per share this week so lets say 290 * 0.02653753 = 7.7 BTC per week?
or am i missing something?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 04, 2013, 11:47:42 AM
I dont follow.. for 1 BTC ATM i can buy 140 virtual mine shares or 41 Tat. asicminer shares..  now

For VM 140 * 0.000041 * 7 = 0.040 BTC/week

For Tat 41 * 0.0002 = 0.009 BTC/week

Correct me if i am wrong in my understanding that VM is paying more dividends per week as compared to Tat
(Sorry i dont have enough BTC to buy an ASICminer share whole.. so Tat.asicminer for me.. )
hero member
Activity: 816
Merit: 1000
June 04, 2013, 11:35:05 AM
Isn't there is risk in assuming:

1. ASICMINER share value will not fall
2. The price of said PMB will not fall
3. ASICMINER won't blow up
4. ASICMINER won't choose to pay a lower div (which they have done)

?
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
June 04, 2013, 11:25:00 AM
Can you explain what you mean by "backed by ... ASICMINER shares"? Does this mean that TAT.VM holds shares of ASICMINER, and these shares belong to bond holders? Or, does it just mean that TAT.VM promises to hold a certain number of shares of ASICMINER as assurance that TAT.VM dividends will be paid?

Also, does "ASICMINER shares that represent an amount of hashing power" mean average hashing power per ASICMINER share? For example, the current ASICMINER hashing power is about 20 Th/s, or about 50 Mh/s/share, so each TAT.VM share would be backed by 1/50th of an ASICMINER share, right?

Finally, in addition to mining, a portion of ASICMINER dividends is based on the profits from sales of hardware. What happens to this portion of the dividends?

TAT.VM promises to hold a certain number of ASICMINER shares as extra assurance that the daily payouts will be made. This is in addition to the confidence that I have enough personal bitcoin to make payouts, even if I didn't hold backing assets.

Your understanding of the hashing aspect and how it works to back this asset is correct. Essentially, I am promising to hold an amount of AM shares that provably represents and equal or greater amount of hashing power to the amount of TAT.VM I have sold.

The only relationship my AM holdings have to this asset is as a form of assurance that the daily payout, as determined by the 24-hour hashing reward formula, will be paid with total confidence. TAT.VM is strictly meant to represent a virtual 1MH/s of hashing power, and the average mining rewards that might reap in a real-world setting, as determined by the formula.

-----
... removed

I ques this is where the hook is hidden. Bite and swallow hard.

If I recall correctly, ASICMINER has 2 sources of income:
1) mining with the ASIC's they build
2) Selling chips / rigs

Do I understand it correctly that:
3) the idea of this perpetual loan is to finance a purchase of X ASIC shares.
4) And pay pass the ASICMINER dividends to bond holders who's "coupon" is based not on what ASICMINER pays out but what 1 Mh/s can mine at current difficulty.

ASICMINER guys and their friends are the only ones who arrived on this party on time. Everyone else is getting slowly but surely screwed.
Why? Take a look a the dif. Smiley If dif. keep running up that hill at same or faster rate, earning back the money invested becomes really hard or even close to impossible. Except for those few, who have already have the ASIC's running.

Now, let's get back to this fabulous opportunity here Smiley

Lets say that 700 BTC - fees will buy about 290 ASICMINER shares.
EDIT: 290 ASICMINER will pay you about what, 72 7.54 BTC in divs per week?
100 000 Mh/s = will earn a lucky bond holders what? 28.9 BTC per week at diff. 12153411.7098? (and this will keep falling as fast as diff keeps climbing)

EDIT: 43 BTC per week for start at 0 risk?  Or did I make a mistake somewhere? (Yes I did) 
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 04, 2013, 10:44:22 AM
How would you get on the other side of this currently?

This issue is logically a bet against network difficulty increase.

Are there any securities or derivatives that would place you on the other side?

It's not as black and white as being a bet against network difficulty increase.

Investing is a bet that difficulty won't rise at a fast enough rate to make investing in this unprofitable.  It's not quite the same thing.

TAT's bet (in launching the security at all) is that there's enough people willing to buy at an unprofitable price (or a break-even/marginally proftable one that gives him cheap capital) to justify the listing cost and effort of maintaining it.  He's on a safe bet there.

There'll be a security allowing you to bet on the other side, hopefully within a few days.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 10:01:03 AM
Since you seem to be really committed to it, let's have a 100 BTC wager - this vs Coinlenders over 3 months. Escrowed with John. Let me know and we can make a new thread.
You are coinlenders arent you?
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 09:46:45 AM
An argument against this bond and all other like it is basicly an argument against mining it self.
a GPU for example pays decreasing "dividents" over time and has diminising resale value
as the idea with mining is to sell your hardware at a price at a point that will allow you to make a profit
it is exactly the same here

..will the dividents be enough or the price decrease little enough to make a profit in the end?
Thats up for everyone to deside by himself
I dont see this as a sure win or a sure loss and propably will be both win and loss for some ppl...
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
June 04, 2013, 09:22:38 AM
How would you get on the other side of this currently?

This issue is logically a bet against network difficulty increase.

Are there any securities or derivatives that would place you on the other side?

https://bitfunder.com/asset/CoinBr.iDiff-O
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 04, 2013, 09:10:04 AM
How would you get on the other side of this currently?

This issue is logically a bet against network difficulty increase.

Are there any securities or derivatives that would place you on the other side?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
You can't kill math.
June 04, 2013, 08:55:00 AM
Since you seem to be really committed to it, let's have a 100 BTC wager - this vs Coinlenders over 3 months. Escrowed with John. Let me know and we can make a new thread.

It's not about this vs Coinlenders. (Where did that come from?) It's just about this bond being just fine. You're the one coming into a thread with theories as to why it's bad in a hypothetical future, when it's doing just fine in the present reality.

In any case, I don't have 100 BTC, and I'm going to agree to disagree. If you're doing well with Coinlenders, that's great. Cheers sir.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 04, 2013, 08:52:08 AM
I'm simply saying it was built to be used an instrument to anyone that understands how to use it, as well as any that don't.


"as well as any that don't."

Is this where the incentive comes from?
Pages:
Jump to: