Pages:
Author

Topic: The difference between science and religion - page 21. (Read 6507 times)

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
September 05, 2018, 05:05:01 PM
#83
Here's the difference between science and religion. Religion has the answers to the main and most important questions of the universe. Science has a tiny touch of some of the details, and will take thousands of years to catch up to the important things religion already has... through revelation.

Cool

You forgot to add "blah, blah, I can't hear you, blah, blah...evolution is a hoax, blah, blah, I can't hear you, blah, blah".

Here is the difference between the two:

Religion provides answers without evidence.

Science provides answers based on evidence.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 05, 2018, 04:27:42 PM
#82
Here's the difference between science and religion. Religion has the answers to the main and most important questions of the universe. Science has a tiny touch of some of the details, and will take thousands of years to catch up to the important things religion already has... through revelation.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
September 05, 2018, 03:43:03 PM
#81
Here's the difference between science and religion:

While science is busy inventing the internet, curing diseases and putting men in to space, religion is busy foaming at the mouth with whatever you want to call that incoherent rant in the previous post.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 05, 2018, 03:30:17 PM
#80
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
September 05, 2018, 07:36:03 AM
#79
2. The atheist is trying to set himself up as god

This is a logical contradiction... an atheist doesn't believe in gods

It sounds more like you are describing Hinduism, which is a recognized religion

I'd recommend spending a little time learning about other religions and their beliefs, before telling other people what their "religion" believes, lmfao


BADLogic: This topic is about the difference between science and religion.  None of your posts are on-topic, and simply atheist bashing.  You are simply trying to derail the conversation into the same nonsense you spout in every thread.  I will report all your off-topic posts and hopefully others will do the same.
brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 1
September 02, 2018, 03:41:02 PM
#78
If you took all the religions in the world and destroyed them, in 1000 years there would be entirely new religions, completely different from the old religions...

If you took all the science in the world and destroyed it... in 1000 years there would be EXACTLY THE SAME SCIENCE

Mathematics is not something invented by humans, it is discovered by humans... mathematics is the same in any language, on any planet... 1 + 1 = 2 is a provable concept and does not change based on societal norms or which deities they currently worship

Newton and Leibniz are credited with the co-discovery of calculus... they did not invent it, they both discovered it at the same time... math/science is universal, religion is not

"If you took all the religions in the world and destroyed them, in 1000 years there would be entirely new religions, completely different from the old religions..."

That is a risky aseveration to be doing, there's no clues of this being like this, neither proofs. You need to be reading a little more about Carl Gustav Jung and his approach to the psychology of religions and also his thoughts about the joseph campbell's hero's journey. You'll notice that there exists primordial archetypes within human psyche which are as old as humans. And there have been investigations that have showed them to be the source of all cultural and religious phenomena.

The fact that there isn't and won't be any similar religion doesn't disproof that they are different interpretation of the same source phenomena.

Anyway, thanks for this intelligent thread
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
September 05, 2018, 04:48:22 AM
#78
Atheism is a chunk of stupidity... barely a religion. After all, anybody who attempts to be an atheist, knows that he is a liar, because:
1. Nobody knows that God doesn't exist somewhere, and that God has simply hidden Himself from people to observe people in private; nobody knows that this isn't the way things are;
2. The atheist is trying to set himself up as god, simply by trying to force himself to believe that there is no God in the face of knowing #1, above; so when he sets himself up as god, he is contradicting the exact thing that he is proclaiming for himself... atheism.

Since the atheist is doing these things, he has a religion going for himself, even though it is not a religion like other religions. Why? Because he is trying to believe that he can be an atheist even though he knows that God might exist somewhere, and even though - if he thinks about it - he is attempting to set himself up as god simply by trying to be an atheist.

In a similar way, science is a religion when scientist and others try to believe that a science theory is a fact, because they know that being a theory, it can change. but facts don't change. Only things that are believed to be facts when they aren't can change. These people even know science theory can be dropped from theory status if enough evidence against it is discovered. Because of this, believing it to be fact is like a religion for them.

Cool

Barely a religion? It isn't a religion, nor is it stupid, and saying things like this is pretty stupid in my opinion. Why don't you apply the same logic to believers? Going by your logic surely someone who says they know that there's a god is as equally as stupid as the atheist because it's something they can't possibly know for certain. Atheism is a lack of belief or faith if anything. As Richard Dawkins says (and I'm paraphrasing here): you're not an atheist or agnostic towards unicorns if you don't believe in them. There could be unicorns, but there's almost certainly not and there's at least no evidence for them (other than in books, which like religions are just myths containing supernatural beings).

Atheism isn't necessarily the belief that you know there's no god either. It's that you don't believe there is one, unlikely to believe there is one, or you don't see any evidence for there being one:

Well, thanks... for confirming that atheism is a religion for you. You are not bored pointing out. You are worn out dogged tired, because you know that you can't find anything to prove me wrong. The things I say are not proving things. They are thinking things, and you can't find anything wrong with them. If you could, you would say it rather than continually saying that I am wrong, without having anything to show as wrongness in me.

Again, science theory, when it is believed to be fact, is a religion for those who so believe. The dictionary definition I pointed out shows it by definition, that anything you believe in is a religion for you, or part of your personal religion.

Cool

You're being intellectually dishonest here and are trying to stretch definitions to suit your agenda. If something is a fact then it is a fact. It's not a religious belief if you believe that water is wet. You can't say the people who "believe" the earth is round are a religion. A theory is a proposed idea:

Quote
A theory is a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalizing thinking, or the results of such thinking

A theory can be debunked or disproved if it's not true. The earth being flat used to be a theory. Then the earth being round was a theory. One was disproved and the other was proved by facts and science (though you still get idiots who think the earth is flat but hey, some people deny facts and logic). I think all scientific theories probably start out as abstract ideas or educated guesses or assumptions, but then you look for evidence to either support or disprove them.

brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
September 02, 2018, 12:32:35 PM
#77
Science investigates the natural world, while religion deals with the spiritual and supernatural — hence, the two can be complementary. Many religious organizations have issued statements declaring that there need not be any conflict between religious faith and the scientific perspective on evolution.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 04, 2018, 02:49:05 PM
#77
1. Nobody knows that God doesn't exist somewhere, and that God has simply hidden Himself from people to observe people in private; nobody knows that this isn't the way things are;

And nobody knows that there isn't a china teapot in between the Earth and Mars revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit. That's not how the burden of proof works.


2. The atheist is trying to set himself up as god, simply by trying to force himself to believe that there is no God in the face of knowing #1, above; so when he sets himself up as god, he is contradicting the exact thing that he is proclaiming for himself... atheism.

Since the atheist is doing these things, he has a religion going for himself, even though it is not a religion like other religions. Why? Because he is trying to believe that he can be an atheist even though he knows that God might exist somewhere, and even though - if he thinks about it - he is attempting to set himself up as god simply by trying to be an atheist.

More nonsense wordplay. I'm bored pointing out yet again that you are simply proving yet again my point that you have zero proof for your claims. Present some actual evidence please.


Well, thanks... for confirming that atheism is a religion for you. You are not bored pointing out. You are worn out dogged tired, because you know that you can't find anything to prove me wrong. The things I say are not proving things. They are thinking things, and you can't find anything wrong with them. If you could, you would say it rather than continually saying that I am wrong, without having anything to show as wrongness in me.

Again, science theory, when it is believed to be fact, is a religion for those who so believe. The dictionary definition I pointed out shows it by definition, that anything you believe in is a religion for you, or part of your personal religion.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
September 04, 2018, 02:22:59 PM
#76
1. Nobody knows that God doesn't exist somewhere, and that God has simply hidden Himself from people to observe people in private; nobody knows that this isn't the way things are;

And nobody knows that there isn't a china teapot in between the Earth and Mars revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit. That's not how the burden of proof works.


2. The atheist is trying to set himself up as god, simply by trying to force himself to believe that there is no God in the face of knowing #1, above; so when he sets himself up as god, he is contradicting the exact thing that he is proclaiming for himself... atheism.

Since the atheist is doing these things, he has a religion going for himself, even though it is not a religion like other religions. Why? Because he is trying to believe that he can be an atheist even though he knows that God might exist somewhere, and even though - if he thinks about it - he is attempting to set himself up as god simply by trying to be an atheist.

More nonsense wordplay. I'm bored pointing out yet again that you are simply proving yet again my point that you have zero proof for your claims. Present some actual evidence please.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 04, 2018, 02:00:40 PM
#75
-snip-

I don't understand this argument at all.

Firstly, atheism is not a religion in the same way that not playing football is not a sport.

Secondly, what a desperate argument. The best argument you have for your position isn't atheism is wrong, science is wrong, look at all the proof for god, or look at the evidence for creation, but instead "you are just as irrational/delusional as I am!"

How utterly confused you are. But please, continue with your silly word games and prove my point even further.

Atheism is a chunk of stupidity... barely a religion. After all, anybody who attempts to be an atheist, knows that he is a liar, because:
1. Nobody knows that God doesn't exist somewhere, and that God has simply hidden Himself from people to observe people in private; nobody knows that this isn't the way things are;
2. The atheist is trying to set himself up as god, simply by trying to force himself to believe that there is no God in the face of knowing #1, above; so when he sets himself up as god, he is contradicting the exact thing that he is proclaiming for himself... atheism.

Since the atheist is doing these things, he has a religion going for himself, even though it is not a religion like other religions. Why? Because he is trying to believe that he can be an atheist even though he knows that God might exist somewhere, and even though - if he thinks about it - he is attempting to set himself up as god simply by trying to be an atheist.

In a similar way, science is a religion when scientist and others try to believe that a science theory is a fact, because they know that being a theory, it can change. But facts don't change. Only things that are believed to be facts when they aren't, can change. These people even know science theory can be dropped from theory status if enough evidence against it is discovered. Because of this, believing it to be fact is like a religion for them.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
September 04, 2018, 07:39:13 AM
#74
-snip-

I don't understand this argument at all.

Firstly, atheism is not a religion in the same way that not playing football is not a sport.

Secondly, what a desperate argument. The best argument you have for your position isn't atheism is wrong, science is wrong, look at all the proof for god, or look at the evidence for creation, but instead "you are just as irrational/delusional as I am!"

How utterly confused you are. But please, continue with your silly word games and prove my point even further.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
September 04, 2018, 07:33:51 AM
#73
....

by the phrase " any system of beliefs" and based on your statement "I (and millions others) do not believe/worship/pray to a god/gods/superhuman/supernatural power.". By simply saying that (you do not believe in god = You believe that God did not exist). Therefore atheism is still a belief system....

Maybe or maybe not, but you have not proved it with your illogic.

There is no equality where you placed it.

hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 588
September 04, 2018, 07:19:27 AM
#72

Collins: Religion is belief in a god or gods and the activities that are connected with this belief, such as praying or worshipping

Oxford: The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods

Merriam Webster: the service and worship of God or the supernatural

I (and millions others) do not believe/worship/pray to a god/gods/superhuman/supernatural power. Therefore, you are wrong yet again.



Thanks for giving this links, by that I can argue with your statement.

Collins: -  You missed to point this meaning from the link you've given .
Quote
b.
any system of beliefs, practices, ethical values, etc. resembling, suggestive of, or likened to such a system


by the phrase " any system of beliefs" and based on your statement "I (and millions others) do not believe/worship/pray to a god/gods/superhuman/supernatural power.". By simply saying that (you do not believe in god = You believe that God did not exist). Therefore atheism is still a belief system and based on the link you have given. One synonym of religion is "belief" and by that I have concluded (congrats) you are a very religious person cause you hardly believe that god never existed.


Oxford: -
Quote
A pursuit or interest followed with great devotion.
‘consumerism is the new religion’

Based on that link and based on your statement. You have a great devotion since you are committed by not believing in god right?


Thefore, you are wrong as well.

legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
September 04, 2018, 07:12:59 AM
#71
The difference between facts and fairy-tales.

If you took all the religions in the world and destroyed them, in 1000 years there would be entirely new religions, completely different from the old religions...

If you took all the science in the world and destroyed it... in 1000 years there would be EXACTLY THE SAME SCIENCE

I think religions would die off very quickly if it wasn't for parents brainwashing their children with their own beliefs. People should teach their children how to think, not what to think and I the world would be a better place for it. We'd probably then have a lot more free-thinkers and scientists as opposed to just brainwashed kids that pass on the same indoctrination to their own children and the cycle continues. If a child was educated in science without the mention of religions I doubt they'd ever pick up a religious text in the future and think it was a legitimate source of knowledge and decide to be a convert or follower of whatever book they picked up. Even if you gave them a copy of the bible, quran, torah etc and asked them to choose which one they believed was the one 'true' one I don't think they'd come to the conclusion that it had to be one of them.
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
September 01, 2018, 02:49:11 PM
#70
Science is basically based on empirical evidence while religion is based on belief in the unseen (faith)
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
September 04, 2018, 06:27:03 AM
#70
Okay. So you quote one entry from several dictionaries. Don't you even look below or above the one entry you found, to see that there are other entries that confirm what I said? Are you unwilling to check other dictionaries? Are you unwilling to check the in-depth meanings of words in encyclopedias?

All you are doing is showing yourself to be incompetent in these things that you say. But we kinda knew that, because a few posts up I showed a dictionary link that proves what I have been saying... - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/religion?s=t. But you completely ignored it and went on your way with meanings that you made up.

You gave a quote from an online search. I gave you quotes from the 3 most widely selling dictionaries in the world. You can cherry pick all you want, the fact is you lied yet again. Nowhere in the 3 most widely selling dictionaries in the world does the definition state, as you claimed, that "all people are religious".

Please continue to argue though. Every one of your nonsense posts, arguing about petty semantics and trying to argue that facts are based on faith just confirms my initial point:

It's because they don't have any actual evidence or proof to support their position, and they know they can't even begin to argue against the mountains of evidence that proves they are wrong. Their only defense is to resort to petty semantics and try to claim that somehow facts aren't facts and that evidence isn't evidence.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
September 03, 2018, 09:35:01 PM
#69
Every day, we state facts briefly. You might say "That man is a criminal." You don't cite the cases and details.

.....

Anecdotes are not facts... you are still wrong, just stop with your nonsense
.....

Not an anecdote. Saying "That man is a criminal" is stating a fact.

It's true, another party might say "I don't believe it. Prove it." Then it's incumbent upon the first to state the underlying details.

Just go attend a chemistry class. Nothing but exposition of facts without underlying support. All of science is this way.

However, the underlying facts exist.

Religion is in fact based on belief, not fact in any sense. It's silly and ignorant to argue otherwise.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 03, 2018, 09:30:01 PM
#68
My meanings are as the dictionary meanings are.

Let people see that by the definitions, all people are religious

Collins: Religion is belief in a god or gods and the activities that are connected with this belief, such as praying or worshipping

Oxford: The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods

Merriam Webster: the service and worship of God or the supernatural

I (and millions others) do not believe/worship/pray to a god/gods/superhuman/supernatural power. Therefore, you are wrong yet again.


Okay. So you quote one entry from several dictionaries. Don't you even look below or above the one entry you found, to see that there are other entries that confirm what I said? Are you unwilling to check other dictionaries? Are you unwilling to check the in-depth meanings of words in encyclopedias?

All you are doing is showing yourself to be incompetent in these things that you say. But we kinda knew that, because a few posts up I showed a dictionary link that proves what I have been saying... - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/religion?s=t. But you completely ignored it and went on your way with meanings that you made up.

But thank you. You encourage me to bring up my activity rating when you do this.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 01, 2018, 08:36:03 AM
#67
in my local traditional religion, those guys can't just only forecast weather, they can as well control it.

Proof please.


Watch Hurricane Lane Be Destroyed By HAARP-Like EMF





Like most of us, I have watched hurricanes via aerial and satellite photos all my life. Huge, masses of moisture, wind and POWER spiraling counterclockwise (reverse in the Southern Hemisphere) and often doing enormous damage when these monsters make landfall.

How big was Hurricane Lane? How large was the danger posed to the US Military on and around Oahu? It was SO large, there was a highest level US Navy alert and warning issued a couple days before Hurricane Lane was due to slam into Oahu… potentially causing hundreds of millions in damage to military installations which control the entire Asia Pacific theater.

The Alert instructed all military personnel to make plans to either get out or to prepare to shelter in place. This was not a joke to US Naval Command.


Read more at https://rense.com/general96/H/poof-of-total-weather-control-by-the-us-military.htm.


Cool
Pages:
Jump to: