Topic: The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected. - page 15. (Read 7198 times)

Oh there's more...



Plus he had 5 or 6 Casinos go bankrupt and as of a couple weeks ago the Trump Organization was found guilty of felony fraud charges in a criminal trial by  jury.  The CFO is currently packing his bags for 5 months in prison (separate case).


https://labor411.org/411-blog/here-are-all-of-trump-s-bankruptcies-and-failed-businesses/

Did Trump have an university or campus? Really?
I would have never guessed it. He is really into all kind of businesses it seems: real state, NFT's , among others and it seems he even attempted with education and social media.

A pity to him, I would have guessed those university classes could have been interesting.

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement for 'victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university'


https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-finalizes-25-million-settlement-victims-donald-trumps/story?id=54347237

You didn't mention that his company will appeal.     

Trump Organization found guilty of all charges in tax fraud scheme


https://www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1141063791/trump-organization-found-guilty-of-all-charges-in-tax-fraud-scheme

You quote some news stuff. But looking further into it shows that:
1. Trump isn't doing it right, or;
2. This is the way Trump wants it, or;
3. Trump is as much of a puppet as Biden.

Your sources are more or less there for sensationalism, to sell copy. You can see how they change their story when the truth comes out into the open. This is what's happening with Covid and the vaxx, gradually. Sooner or later it will happen with Trump and the election stuff.

Trump loves to win but keeps losing election lawsuits


https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-losing-election-lawsuits-36d113484ac0946fa5f0614deb7de15e

This case, along with all the rest of the cases in America, make up part of American law.

Trump probably used attorneys, thereby making himself a ward of the court, and transferring himself into the jurisdiction of the court (judge) and its decision. Judges are clever. They can decide cases that are in their jurisdiction how ever they want. If there wasn't a jury trial, it can be appealed, same as any case.

If one or more of the 4 requirements I mentioned in my previous post are missing from in this case, and... if Trump decides to not make himself a ward of the court in an appeal... the case can be shown to be a 'void judgment case' in the appeal. But Trump will have to learn a little law and do his own talking in court... which he probably won't do.

However, Trump may have wanted, and might like, the courts decision to be this way, for reasons that are not readily apparent to us. It might be his way of gaining sympathy from his supporters who will realize even more how corrupt the swamp is after all.


Are you familiar with Shepardizing in law? It's a method that one can use to see which cases have been overturned. There are, maybe, millions of them. So, what's the point of your post?

But thanks. It gives me opportunity to strengthen my familiarity with the law, while at the same time showing others. If you are really interested in the insignificance of most court cases, get over to http://voidjudgments.net/ and learn the basics.

Judge orders Donald Trump to pay nearly $1 million to Hillary Clinton, James Comey and other political foes for ‘frivolous’ lawsuit

They received what they deserved, but not in the way of justice. What I mean is this.

An attorney's first duty is to the court.
His second duty is to the public... the State or Federal.
His third duty is to himself.
His fourth duty is to his client as long as it doesn't interfere with the first three.

The client of an attorney is a ward of the court. This means that he is an infant or of unsound mind.

To see that this info is true, look in the law encyclopedia, CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, Volume 7, Section 4 and other sections. You don't need me to prove this to you. All you need is to go to any law library (most have a copy of CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM) and look it up yourself. You can even find it online; it's popular.

So, these guys either hired attorneys, or accepted court appointed attorneys. They did it to themselves. What did they do to themselves? They didn't allow the 4 legs of a proper court case to appear, because attorneys won't bring the 4 legs (necessarily). What are the 4 legs?
1. An accuser bringing the lawsuit;
2. An accused;
3. Injury supposedly done by the accused;
4. At least one witness plus evidence.

If any of these are lacking, it isn't a proper lawsuit, and the court (judge) doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction. If you are at all interested in seeing this about the courts, look here http://voidjudgments.com/.


I wouldn't hire an attorney except as co-counsel, and with the expressed agreement that I wasn't his client. Of course, that means that I would have to be pro se, or something similar. I would have to do all my own talking in court. The attorney couldn't speak for me, but only could advise me.

Four Oath Keepers convicted of Jan. 6 seditious conspiracy


https://apnews.com/article/oath-keepers-seditious-conspiracy-conviction-2b9fb724c9839524d00ee389959e0e62

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions. If people do not bring their case to the courts the right way, they lose. Bringing the case properly might include a case against a corrupt judge: "Fraud upon the court by the court." The Arizona election fraud case that Kari Lake brought is almost like that. The judge played around, but skipped over the point of the cases... election fraud... for which there should have been an election redo.

Also. When I drive somewhere, I drive about 5 MPH over the speed limit. Why? So that I'm not driving under the speed limit for those who are trying to do 20 MPH over the speed limit. But here's the funny part. If there's a yellow line that says they can't pass, they won't pass, even if there isn't any traffic coming. So, why is it they only break the law regarding speed, yet won't disobey regarding the yellow line? The point is that most of us are illegal one way or another.

The point with the Arizona case is that the election fraud was BIG and right out in broad daylight. I expect that it will be turned around, one way or another. My fear is that because Kari Lake is as outspoken as she is, that she might be assassinated.

Democracy is based on election fraud. Case in point, it's illegal for a politician to bribe people into voting for him by paying them. However it is NOT ILLEGAL for the politician to bribe people into voting for him by "cancelling student debt". The whole thing is a sham and the fraud is the system itself.

Listen to and watch Kari Lake from yesterday, January 25. People are watching around the world.

Trump started it with his 2020 fight. When Trump lost - something that couldn't have happened without a bunch of corruption - we saw how deep the corruption went. Now watch the Kari Lake, Rumble video where Kari explains what is happening - https://rumble.com/v2749w6-january-25-2023.html.

Note that, when Lake was in court, the important point was ignored. The point is that the election was technically a failure. This was ignored.

You think Hugo Chavez is still changing votes with dominion voting or was it one of those groups the pillow guy was talking about.

I DO have a question. How long will it take justice to change the election results?


Testimony to Arizona Senate Election Committee Reveals Almost Half the Ballots Ran Through Maricopa County Tabulators Failed

---

https://thestarnewsnetwork.com/2023/01/25/testimony-to-arizona-senate-election-committee-reveals-almost-half-the-ballots-ran-through-maricopa-county-tabulators-failed/
The election committee of the Arizona Senate held a hearing on Monday featuring the results of an investigation into Maricopa County's 2022 midterm election conducted by the election integrity group We the People AZ (WPAZ). Commissioned by outgoing Senate President Karen Fann (R-Prescott), the group submitted public records requests to Maricopa County Elections Department to obtain the data. The leader of WPAZ, Shelby Busch, testified to the committee chaired by State Senator Wendy Rogers (R-Flagstaff) that 464,926 ballots fed into tabulators on Election Day in Maricopa County, 217,305 were rejected, which is nearly a 50 percent failure rate.

Busch told the legislators it was a "complete systemic failure" of signature verification and urged "legislative intervention." She warned that the system is "vulnerable to fraud."

Dr. Walter Daugherity, a math professor at Texas A&M University, testified that he was 99.999 percent confident that there were 290,644 bad signatures accepted in the election.

Of the verified signatures, 47,366 failed to meet the basic Arizona Secretary of State standards, the group found. Busch showed how they failed multiple points of the 12 points of signature verification. A full 10 percent "egregiously" failed signature verification.

Busch said every single one of the 446 tabulators in Maricopa County failed the allowable error standard allowed by the Electoral Assistance Commission (EAC). The EAC allows for only a misfeed rate of .002 percent, or one out of every 500. Some had a failure rate as high as 95 percent.
...

---

More important, the American people lost. But things are changing with the people. Now that we realize what happened, we are bringing up the Kraken, even if we have to become the Kraken to do it. So, the Trump loss, which was really a loss for the people, is working to clean the swamp by showing us how deeply the swamp is entrenched.

Not finished. Rather, just starting.

It's 2023.  The 2020 election is over.  Trump lost.  It's over.  Done.  Finished.  Same as this lawsuit.

Until it's over, it isn't over.

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number)
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.  
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago)

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  


I don't think the supreme supreme court will hear it either.  Do you?


The Brunsons lost.  Appealed to the supreme court. Supreme court said "no, you lost".

Same thing happened to Trump in the 2020 election.  That's why Biden is the president in 2023.