It's time we corrected the faulty judicial system. They work for corruption and the best dollar they can get. The judgment doesn't mean that Dominion is innocent. It only means that the court system is dancing around ways to make the most money.
There was no judgement in the real world.
Fox agreed to pay Dominion almost a BILLION dollars for spreading lies about their voting machines switching votes from Trump to Biden.
The question wasn't whether or not the claims were lies. They were definitely lies. It was about whether or not Fox spread the lies with "Actual Malice".
Which of Fox's lies are true in BADeckerville? What actually happened there?
Since we all know that the Dominion voting machines are controlled/manipulated by outside controllers, the questions are different than what the lawsuit might suggest they are when simply looking at the results. For example. It may be that Fox lied when they let themselves be found guilty. It may simply be that a lot of politics are involved, and corruption in the judiciary would have made things a lot worse for Fox if they hadn't anted up the piddly amount that they did.
Part of the point is in the wording. If Fox said, simply, that the voting machines switched votes from Trump to Biden, depending on how the statements were worded, voting machines, themselves, don't have that kind of judgment capability. Fox would have been wrong.
If Fox had said that voting machine controllers outside of Dominion operators controlled the machines, and so switched the votes, Fox might have been totally clear of any blame in this.
The whole thing depends on the wording of the lawsuit. If the lawsuit were worded differently, Dominion might be paying Fox. If Fox had proclaimed their news in a different way, a way which showed the corruption through the Dominion machines, but didn't demean Dominion, things would have been different.
In addition, things are moving towards setting up precedent for ethical vote counting in Arizona.
Maricopa County Loses First Amendment Lawsuit from The Gateway Pundit, Agrees to Pay $175,000 for Banning Reporter from Elections
https://arizonasuntimes.com/news/maricopa-county-loses-first-amendment-lawsuit-from-the-gateway-pundit-agrees-to-pay-175000-for-banning-reporter-from-elections/ralexander/2023/04/19/Maricopa County agreed last week to pay The Gateway Pundit (TGP) and its reporter Jordan Conradson $175,000 to settle their lawsuit over refusing to provide Conradson with a press pass to cover elections. An Obama-appointed trial court judge sided with the county in November, but after an injunction from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals followed by oral arguments that revealed the three-judge panel was likely to reverse the lower court fully, the Maricopa County Supervisors voted to settle.
The controversy began in September 2022 when the county implemented a press pass regulation blocking journalists from election press conferences if they showed "conflicts of interest" and were not "free of associations that would compromise journalistic integrity or damage credibility." The county cited Conradson's attendance at Republican events as a conflict of interest and told him, "[Y]ou are not a bona fide correspondent of repute in your profession."
----------
Jordan Conradson🇺🇸
@ConradsonJordan·
Follow
HUGE WIN! The 9th circuit court of appeals has ruled on the side of our First Amendment in @gatewaypundit’s lawsuit against @MaricopaCounty’s totalitarian attempts to control the narrative
...