Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 18. (Read 7674 times)
the longer ico does not affect the allocation for the bounty they extend the bounty because ico they need the support of the participants, if you get a little result, the participants who join the bounty are very many
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
I think it depends because you may earn less if the campaign doesn't reach their goal and that's somehow saddening. We can't avoid bounty campaigns like this, we should be really careful and picky towards choosing what bounty campaign to join.
In most of the cases increase of ICO duration means you will earn less because of larger number of participants. But there are campaigns that increase allocated amounts with the increase of the duration of the campaign, they add amounts to already allocated amounts, thus giving all participants an opportunity to earn.
if I think that depends on the prize hunter, if there are many participants we will get a little income, but if the participants are few we will get enough income.
I can agree. In long bonuses campaigns, they have many users who have time to join them. Thus, it is possible that at the end of the campaign there will be more than thousand participants. This makes bets very small. Therefore, I prefer to participate in campaigns with bonuses with fewer users.
I have also experienced this. If I think it's better to leave the gift because it's too long, I think it's better to follow another gift. There are still many gifts that are useful and can make rich people.
In my opinion yes that is happen sometimes but sometimes court manager extend bounty then he also extend the bounty pool rewards so it's all depends on bounty pool rewards when that is extend with bounty so that doesn't affect the reward that much.
Yes if your rank are full member below but if you got legendary account then its more profitable since you receive more stakes than other. So dragging bounty for so long will not profitable to low rank members.
it all depends on the market situation!if the course is good then we can sell!and so waiting for the right moment and sell everything!valuable coins lie and wait in the wings)
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
i dont think that it is, but if you have a high rank and the bounty will have a longer period, then you have a lead than any other lower ranks than you, but if the campaign will have much more participants in the mean time, the possibility of low earnings for you will be high.
When bounties extend their ICO, they pave way to attract more people that is bounty hunters. They begin to share the profit among all participants depending on the campaigns and efforts you put in.
the time used for the bounty can not guarantee income we would receive. dependent work system made if payment is based on the coin directly rather than stake I think will benefit if the longer campaign. But if a payment using the stake it depends sales made.
I think your friend is giving up easily, the price of bitcoin really influences market prices and circulation in the world of cryptocurrency.
We should learn from the bad experiences we have, so that you will find more opportunities to survive in the cryptocurrency world.
We are not only bounty hunters but we are also stakeholders of every ICO we follow, try to understand the situation and be wiser again because of the deteriorating market prices.
Try harder because the storm will pass and a sunny day awaits you.
We should learn from the bad experiences we have, so that you will find more opportunities to survive in the cryptocurrency world.
We are not only bounty hunters but we are also stakeholders of every ICO we follow, try to understand the situation and be wiser again because of the deteriorating market prices.
Try harder because the storm will pass and a sunny day awaits you.
If you get paid for the bounty extension, and the reward does not increase, you obviously get less. Now it's such a time that it's very hard for many projects, even good projects, to collect even a soft cap. I think, soon everything will change
From my personal experience I can say that not always long bounties of the company bring little tokens. In my case, there was one bounty that lasted 8 months and I earned tokens at 1 USD. But there was also another bounty, which even restarted and it at this time gave good iks and the token cost dearly and I earned it well. Most likely, the project team itself plays a role here, on which depends what will happen to the token after the completion of the company's ico and bounty.
Earnings never depend only on the length period of the certain campaign. They are usually from the beginning. However, when campaign get delayed, sometimes i stop in participating, because it`s the sign of the problems in the project`s organization. But if the project is good enough and I trust the team and the pause because of the good reasons then I'm ok with it.
It all depends on the specific situation, it is difficult to give an answer without knowing the details. But if you are not sure about the project, it is better to leave and not lose your time, but this is due to the risk that the necessary amount will still be collected, and you will remain without tokens.
My answer is both yes and no. This is because it depends on a lot of conditions. First I support yes because if the time for the campaign is not extended, some participants won't have had the opportunity to join the campaign and as such few people would have shared the earnings. Also, they don't have a separate reward for early bounty hunters that joined the bounty earlier than others. Also, most bounties extend the bounty timeline but fail to increase the reward and as people keep joining, the reward per participant keeps reducing.
Unfortunately yes. In most cases this is so. My personal experience shows that the longer the bounty, the lower the payout ... but the reason can be different .. all the same it is worth looking at a specific project.
My statistics show that on short campaigns the profit is more.
There were campaigns that lasted almost a year, as a result, the profit is very small.
Now I'm taking campaigns that last no longer than a month.
There were campaigns that lasted almost a year, as a result, the profit is very small.
Now I'm taking campaigns that last no longer than a month.
Jump to: