It would be a very commendable attitude if the government really showed that it is concerned about its people, they could also ban cigarettes and beer and wines, in short, ban all alcoholic beverages, but unfortunately the government only bans gambling with the argument that it is protecting people but cannot banish alcoholic beverages that every day has created hundreds of new addicts, hundreds of car accidents due to driving under the influence of alcohol. so I ask myself:
Why do they ban gambling, but leave the cigarette and alcoholic drink?
Isn't the government's job to protect the people? I come to the following conclusion: casinos are not owned by corrupt politicians, at least most casinos are not theirs, but companies and beers, wines, gins, whiskeys are owned by many corrupt politicians for this reason they do not ban companies of alcoholic beverages
The government can indeed ban cigarettes, beer, and wine, but gambling has many consequences even though these three things also bring bad consequences for people. But I agree with your conclusion because perhaps, corrupt politicians prefer beer, wine, and cigarettes, and they may think that gambling is riskier than anything else.
But whatever it is, the government's job is to protect the people and ensure they are not affected by the bad effects that could occur. Maybe they wanted to see how people reacted after implementing a gambling ban, so they applied the same to beer, wine, and cigarettes. Surely later, there will be an evaluation of what they have done to determine what the next step is.