I think the only reason why people holding gold and bitcoin is both are good investment, but it in comes in longterm investment I'll choose gold even the volatility is very slow, bcoz bitcoin is a high risk investment.
Bitcoin and gold are no doubt very much beneficial for long term investment and can help you have a good amount of money. I will prefer Bitcoin over gold unlike you. The reason we all know very well and that is Bitcoin will help me earn more profit in the future as compared to that of gold.
Topic: The Real Reason to Hold Gold And Bitcoin - page 31. (Read 674548 times)
The world is run by the state-bank alliance. The top politicians and bankers jointly profit from inflating the values of money and debt with state power -- this system couldn't survive without either side.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
It is because many people know that bitcoin has a unstable value so that they believe that if they hold the bitcoin if the price is unsatisfying they will somehow earn if the value of it become higher and that time they will sold their tokens or use their bitcoin. Many people use this strategy because they saw it is more effective.
The world is run by the state-bank alliance. The top politicians and bankers jointly profit from inflating the values of money and debt with state power -- this system couldn't survive without either side.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
The reason why is that people always hold bitcoin is that because they actually save it from something or situation that may needed like emergencies and many people also expect for the amount of it to get higher in the future. People did some strategic way of holding it and aaiting for the right time to sell or to use it because they find it more profitable.
because the value of gold and bitcoin will go more higher. both are good investments 
I believe that bitcoin and gold are good investments. Each experienced investor will distribute their funds between them both to avoid losses and get a good profit.
Indeed! Both gold and bitcoins have very strong market and a huge number of customers, so it is wise to invest in both since both have their own specialties of making us rich. Since bitcoins are on peak now a day, so it is advisable to invest bigger portion of your savings into bitcoins than gold.
It makes sense to hold both by diversifying your resources into Bitcoin no gold do that should any fail to glitter in the future you'll still be covered but that's just a way of playing it safe. You can actually keep faith and invest all in bitcoin because it will not fail per the current interest and happenings around the world.
actually I prefer to hold bitcoin rather than gold, why do you choose to hold the goods if the total supply of goods is very much? you should withhold the assets that his total supply is few and limited? yes that's the reason I hold the bitcoin instead of holding gold.
Bitcoin is better than gold and I really appreciate your decision to select the bitcoin instead of gold now. The bitcoin is increasing in price while the bitcoin is not leaving the space for the people to switch other currency. So we must be good at diving the financial at the time of the investment. Trusting bitcoin will increase your income and will give you profit.
Gold is..rare , precious, Beautiful and costly so..you can say that as long as women are there (not genral) there will be a very high demand for gold and..being something pertaining to limited supply its price will rise with the increasing population thus gold is something stable and less risky where as the bitcoins are like a lottery you may become a millionaire or you could face a lot of loss..both are awesome..when Investment comes into play gold is always preferred cuz its no risk factor... Makes it an excellent choice...
Because they are rare, anti-inflationary.
At the opposite, debt and amount of fiat money are just growing.
At the opposite, debt and amount of fiat money are just growing.
I think both Gold and Bitcoin have the best prices actually and they are the most valuable assets nowadays. Bitcoin's price now is a lot more than gold itself, but gold too is always valuable , investing and holding gold and bitcoin is the best choice in my opinion
...
Today featured something interesting: the US$, gold and Bitcoin are all up. Put that in your pipe and smoke it...
Au and BTC are both great holdings to balance out other financial assets. They are relatively independent of each other in price movements. What does that spell?
Diversification!
Today featured something interesting: the US$, gold and Bitcoin are all up. Put that in your pipe and smoke it...
Au and BTC are both great holdings to balance out other financial assets. They are relatively independent of each other in price movements. What does that spell?
Diversification!
Both Gold and Bitcoins are good for investment , But bitcoins have no control neither its price fixed. Also it have limited supply. Since gold is more famous as compare to bitcoins, people want gold rather than bitcoins. I think Gold is still considered as a safe investment because it does not suddenly go up or down in value.
The real reason to hold gold and Bitcoin for me is because it will go up in value a lot.
The world is run by the state-bank alliance. The top politicians and bankers jointly profit from inflating the values of money and debt with state power -- this system couldn't survive without either side.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
The real reason why we need to hold bitcoins and golds are because the value of the two are continuing to rise up. The bitcoin and gold are really good for investment.See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
The world is run by the state-bank alliance. The top politicians and bankers jointly profit from inflating the values of money and debt with state power -- this system couldn't survive without either side.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
The real reason why we need to hold bitcoins and golds are because the value of the two are continuing to rise up. The bitcoin and gold are really good for investment. See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
The world is run by the state-bank alliance. The top politicians and bankers jointly profit from inflating the values of money and debt with state power -- this system couldn't survive without either side.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
See Dissecting the Parasitocracy.
The interesting thing is, if you buy and hold gold and Bitcoin for the long term, you can benefit. (Just make sure you don't buy when the global empire is rising, like the 1950s or early 1990s.) The reason is also due to the nature of the state-bank alliance.
Note that, in this alliance, the top politicians contribute state power, while the top bankers contribute financial know-how. The politicians, being totally ignorant in this high-stakes and specialized game, are basically led around like children. They just go along because they benefit from issuing huge amounts of public debt without being punished by the 'markets.'
So here's the problem with this alliance. When financial asset values collapse (and this day will come, due to the incentives faced by the elites) and everyday people suffer, the politicians will put all the blame on the bankers. The reasons are obvious (and there is no loyalty in that game,) and the politicians are going to win that argument. The biggest such events in history include the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust. In our day, politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have already gone after the bankers.
Knowing that, the bankers and central bankers must prepare a last-ditch rescue for a worst-case scenario, when all trust in the system is gone. That rescue will be some non-state-issued asset, like gold, silver, and Bitcoin, that the elites can peg their money to (at a high price for the non-state asset,) stabilize their system, and ease the suffering. Even if the bankers think there's only a small chance for such an occurrence, it will be so devastating to the bankers that they must prepare for it.
So, the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance. In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.
I think that the teal reason we should hold bitcoin is in the hopes that we cab sell it into a higher price than what it is now. As there are still some hope that we should always hold or have that there are places in the market wr have bot utilized.
The real reason is that they have limited supply, and people want them. (people may not want bitcoin in the future btw) People always want gold and they want to gather as much as possible in their lifetime. It is the only solid asset which holds its true value through the centuries.
There are lot of reason why we should hold our bitcoin and bitcoin. Furthermore, both of them have limited supply and there is a possibility that their price will increase in the near future and it can be the reason to gain much profit. Holding will really help us to gain much profit and it is very effective. Main reason i invest in bitcoin about global trends, that's technology. Many richest people in the world successful from business related technology. As well as bitcoin part of technology, more we can become rich by holding bitcoin in the future.
As per my know, nobody succeed in blockchain technology. They only still develop this technology and wait the day they can earn profit from it. Maybe you are mistaken with holder Bitcoin when its price still few dollars 
Main reason i invest in bitcoin about global trends, that's technology. Many richest people in the world successful from business related technology. As well as bitcoin part of technology, more we can become rich by holding bitcoin in the future.
As per my know, nobody succeed in blockchain technology. They only still develop this technology and wait the day they can earn profit from it. Maybe you are mistaken with holder Bitcoin when its price still few dollars Main reason i invest in bitcoin about global trends, that's technology. Many richest people in the world successful from business related technology. As well as bitcoin part of technology, more we can become rich by holding bitcoin in the future.
As per my know, nobody succeed in blockchain technology. They only still develop this technology and wait the day they can earn profit from it. Maybe you are mistaken with holder Bitcoin when its price still few dollars Jump to: