Well, right now it's not that difficult to choose IEO. just see where IEO is, then you can conclude it. however, for ICO, it seems like we can't do something like this before confirming who they are working with. however, ICO is now starting to disappear. IEO is better because it's easier to research IEO than ICO.
That's right, it's easier for us to conclude whether IEO is good or not, just by looking at where they are. Whereas ICO is very difficult to conclude whether ICO is good or not, because Scammers can manipulate all aspects of ICO, whitepapers and even fake teams.
This is so true! For the avoidance of being scammed, I decided to not join any ICO projects since there were many scammed ones in the past. I have to say that IEO is safer in some aspects. Though, it doesn't mean it's totally safe. Nothing is totally safe in this cryptocurrency market.
IEO's growth was in great demand when it first developed, but if you look at it, it seems like nothing is different from what happened to ICO. now all are the same both ICO and IEO there are still many who do actions that do not provide an advantage.
ICO has indeed been disappointed because many projects have become scams, but now in fact with IEO there has only been a slight change and cannot determine that IEO is the best replacement for ICO. the current income from IEO was very disappointing and could not provide a change that could match the ICO of its time.
what is needed is cooperation from all involved so that ICO can come back and find their identity again. it is needed from those who have the authority to be able to control and from followers to inform each other so that ICO that is not good cannot develop because it is already known. gradually if it is applied, naughty people will suffer losses themselves.
