Topic: The return of ICOs - page 13. (Read 2897 times)

What I would say, I share your views 100% and indeed such an approach matters. At least talking about me, I am not only following the ratings, but conducting own researches, while choosing the most attractive solution

Good afternoon. What makes much sense these days - the practical value and mass adoption every solution brings. Thus, from my point of view, only most advanced solutions are in demand and people are more careful in choosing solutions with real value. And my latest discovery, Centric Foundation, looks rather bold with great opportunities being brought onto the market

I usually only care about IEO projects that plan to launch at high liquidity exchanges and stay away from exchanges with a bad reputation. Besides, when you have chosen to join IEO, you should spend some time to research on that project and should join some AMA to understand better the details of the project you are about to invest.

They are also the one that destroy IEO making it irrelevant compared to when IEO was still hosted by popular exchange only, these kind of exchanges are really stain of crypto world and should be get rid. The means is good enough to provide less popular coin a medium for exchange but the way they accept shitty project is what makes
most of us feels uncomfortable with them and making crypto market dirty.

I agree with you. These exchanges are not worth your trust, and you will definitely lose money if you choose to join IEO there. As far as I know, the coins listed at Latoken or P2PB2B have no good liquidity and certainly will not have any investors interested. It is best if you want to join IEO, you should choose exchanges like Binance or Okex because these are two exchanges that have a lot of good projects for you.

I believe that people now know about these scam exchanges and stay away from them. Since the IEO appeared, these exchanges have listed a lot of projects, but none of them have been successful and have helped investors be profitable.

True. plus many more...they play with projects and keep them busy with that so they can not work on their product and other processes...just fighting with a scam. sad

IEO is only at risk if you participate in the IEO of small exchanges in this market. Like P2PB2B, Latoken and Chainx exchanges, these are scam exchanges and you will definitely lose money when investing in projects there.

Agree. Plus, projects tend to present their ICO/IEOs as a product...it is not. It's just a cost-effective pre-funding model which can save the time-to-market and help to build a community.

I do not agree. Going straight to listings, without proper time-to-market or product, directly influence the growth of scam/bot exchanges. The basic idea of the model is very good: credibility, price stability, access to exchange's data userbase, crowd sale is hosted on the exchange...but this gave huge power to exchanges, without proper regulation/licensing.

I've supported projects to communicate the value (brand/marketing), and helped one of the 1st biggest ICOs in 2017 to raise funds...and more than 15 ICOs and IEOs, and 2 STOs till now...and must say that IEOs make me more problems than ICOs. Why: 1 - bot exchanges, 2 - fees are amazingly high to withdraw money plus they push you to go public with them and than to give you raised funds, 3 - projects are rashing to exchange without vision, product, users..which further led to the extreme numbers of projects listed so users do not know how to recognize a good one, worth investing...

What happened is that companies tend to choose 'the model which works' no matter is it the right one for their business. We can see that everywhere - exploitation of 'what works' until it becomes a scam.

It is sad that happened, but i do hope things will come to its place...will that be ICO/IEO or fundraise...there is substantial room for improvement in the cryptocurrency-based fundraising ecosystem.

At the moment, ICOs are only for scam projects and don't have an operational budget. And I believe that investors know about that and they are avoiding them. Should only be concerned about IEO in the major exchanges in this market, it will help investors to get profits when investing.

although ICO still exists, but I think there is no recent development of ICO at this time. I don't even see a successful project with ICO this year. The ICO might come back, but I think investors have lost their interest in the ICO system. Well, IEO is better than ICO, it's just that IEO also doesn't guarantee that we avoid scammers.

ICO and IEO are always the 2 most risky investments in this market, but for now IEO seems to be better because if guaranteed is listed, investors may not spend too much time waiting. However, you should only choose high liquidity exchanges like Binance, Kucoin or Okex because these are places where you can make a profit and 100% you can liquidate at any time if you like.

ICO is still exist in this market and people have already started to build their trust again with the trusted icos and mostly people have been forgetting to deal with the scam ico and scammers can't do the old trick again.
Some IEO have become scam IEO too and this time investors are looking for a trusted project whatever it's ICO or IEO

No project no matter how good it is will raise any money with ICO. Its era has gone and no one will go back to it again. We will only look forward to have another model that will ensure investor fund safety and good project.

Most ICOs ultimately did not even have a real product and tried to rely on the community which are willing but not knowledgable in these types of investments. All projects that are willing to bring some value to the market and users won't go to the ICO without (at least) MVP. ... Furthermore, the ICO is more suited for making an initial community, not just to raise money.

I think ICO season already over, developers can run away with funds, after ICO the team leave the project and many more, coin not listing in exchanges, the point is so risky. And now IEO comes to make solution for both developers and investors. Developers will gain so much funds also investors will happy because after IEO they can sell it the token in exchanges which doing IEO.

Well, IEO is still a lot of interest even though it often fails after listing on the stock exchange but at least investors' money is not taken away like ICO held by themselves, so I think IEO with quality projects will produce good tokens and we always support it with a new project.

ICOs do not exist in this market, there are so many scam projects in the past and it makes people lose faith in ICOs. Now we have IEO, and it's a good way to help new projects raise funds and keep investors safe when they want to invest in new projects.

the market response is not too visible I think. determine the collapse of the market I think is still too fast. we must look deeper into all the possibilities that can happen. currently, we are in a state of the market that is a little difficult to make choices.