In any work, you can always find some "weak" places. Therefore, it is easiest to give advice to projects when you are sitting at the computer. The project does not stand still and is developing and this is the most important thing.
Correctly said. Errors are in any work. Users are accustomed that everything should be high quality and on time. But sometimes it can be difficult and this should be taken into account. 
Topic: thrash - page 6. (Read 4009 times)
In any work, you can always find some "weak" places. Therefore, it is easiest to give advice to projects when you are sitting at the computer. The project does not stand still and is developing and this is the most important thing.
[What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
That's exactly why you should not get hung up on listing exchanges. And you need to focus on product development. Then there will be recognition in the crypto community and the high price for a coin!The project has a very good activity in social networks. This suggests that the project is interested.
It can be seen that good marketers are working in the project. The team is very active on social networks and forums. This is a good sign for the project investors! [What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
That's exactly why you should not get hung up on listing exchanges. And you need to focus on product development. Then there will be recognition in the crypto community and the high price for a coin!I also think it is better to pay and made a listing for one exchange but known and with a large number of users than to list for several little-known exchanges ...
These are very correct thoughts. The presence of a coin on the top exchange will give the necessary liquidity to the coin and will help increase the popularity of the project.[What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
That's exactly why you should not get hung up on listing exchanges. And you need to focus on product development. Then there will be recognition in the crypto community and the high price for a coin!I also think it is better to pay and made a listing for one exchange but known and with a large number of users than to list for several little-known exchanges ...
These are very correct thoughts. The presence of a coin on the top exchange will give the necessary liquidity to the coin and will help increase the popularity of the project. [What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
That's exactly why you should not get hung up on listing exchanges. And you need to focus on product development. Then there will be recognition in the crypto community and the high price for a coin! What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
The recent situation with Binance and delisting of many coins is a clear confirmation of your words. And by the way, many of the coins that Binance removed from his exchange paid them several million dollars for listing.And the exchanges that provide free listing are little known. They have no trading volume. The project is only for quantity,but the project needs quality. Therefore, it is better to go to a smaller number of exchanges, but of high quality.
You are absolutely right. It is better to raise money and pay a listing on one exchange that belongs to the top level, than to have trading pairs on ten exchanges for which there are no users.i would suggest even a couple of medium-type exchange with active traders and adequate volume would suffice. if you go outright to binance, you are just wasting huge amount of money that the team can use to their developments instead. and if they can't sustain the volume required on that exchange, they will be just delisted for nothing. a starting project does not need numerous exchanges to be listed at but continuous development from the team to further increase its worth in the exchange.
What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
The recent situation with Binance and delisting of many coins is a clear confirmation of your words. And by the way, many of the coins that Binance removed from his exchange paid them several million dollars for listing.
The team’s activity on the GitHub really leaves much to be desired. Or maybe they have another account on GitHub? I understand that this is not the most important indicator, but I would still like to see more activity from developers.
And the exchanges that provide free listing are little known. They have no trading volume. The project is only for quantity,but the project needs quality. Therefore, it is better to go to a smaller number of exchanges, but of high quality.
You are absolutely right. It is better to raise money and pay a listing on one exchange that belongs to the top level, than to have trading pairs on ten exchanges for which there are no users.And the exchanges that provide free listing are little known. They have no trading volume. The project is only for quantity,but the project needs quality. Therefore, it is better to go to a smaller number of exchanges, but of high quality.
You are absolutely right. It is better to raise money and pay a listing on one exchange that belongs to the top level, than to have trading pairs on ten exchanges for which there are no users. 
looks like this is a very solid scam!!! there is no devs behind this project 🚨🚨🚨 https://github.com/IchibaCoin/ICHIBA/blob/master/contrib/gitian-descriptors/gitian-linux.yml#L5 https://github.com/IchibaCoin/ICHIBA/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp
Exchanges are crazy this fact. Yesterday I watched one video on YouTube and there they talked about the plans of Binance to launch its DEX. So the listing for it will cost about $ 100,000. On the CEX exchange of Binance, the price per listing can go up to several million dollars ...
no matter how promising a young project like Ichiba is, where do they get such huge money from?
By such actions, top exchanges destroy young projects without giving them a chance to survive in the modern world. Can a young project find such gigantic amounts on a listing? Of course not...no matter how promising a young project like Ichiba is, where do they get such huge money from?
Well, when listing can be passed for free, but there are very few such exchanges on the market, it is best to pay but choose those that will be useful and the token will be traded
I also think it is better to pay and made a listing for one exchange but known and with a large number of users than to list for several little-known exchanges ...Well, when listing can be passed for free, but there are very few such exchanges on the market, it is best to pay but choose those that will be useful and the token will be traded
I also think it is better to pay and made a listing for one exchange but known and with a large number of users than to list for several little-known exchanges ...Exchanges are crazy this fact. Yesterday I watched one video on YouTube and there they talked about the plans of Binance to launch its DEX. So the listing for it will cost about $ 100,000. On the CEX exchange of Binance, the price per listing can go up to several million dollars ...
no matter how promising a young project like Ichiba is, where do they get such huge money from?
By such actions, top exchanges destroy young projects without giving them a chance to survive in the modern world. Can a young project find such gigantic amounts on a listing? Of course not...no matter how promising a young project like Ichiba is, where do they get such huge money from?
The project has a very good activity in social networks. This suggests that the project is interested.
Jump to: